| Revision as of 21:39, 5 September 2013 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Robot: Archiving 1 thread (older than 31d) to User talk:Useddenim/Archive 3.← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:33, 6 September 2013 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 31d) to User talk:Useddenim/Archive 3.Next edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ::{{Done}}. ] (]) 17:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC) | ::{{Done}}. ] (]) 17:10, 1 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| Wow, great work. Try separating the Vaudreuil red and Candiac yellow squares (Saint-Jérôme Line) and the Mascouche pink and Deux-Montagnes blue squares (Mont-Saint-Hilaire Line) and everything will be perfect! ] (]) 17:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC) | Wow, great work. Try separating the Vaudreuil red and Candiac yellow squares (Saint-Jérôme Line) and the Mascouche pink and Deux-Montagnes blue squares (Mont-Saint-Hilaire Line) and everything will be perfect! ] (]) 17:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| ''This is the discussion (since deleted from ]) that precipitated ]: | |||
| {{archive top}} | |||
| Re ], isn't ''“In addition to the fair-use assertion shown on this page, the copyright holder has granted permission for this image to be used in Misplaced Pages.”'' clear enough? ] (]) 22:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :For wikipedia only licenses mean nothing, that file is non-free and will be treated as such. ] (]) 23:13, 5 August 2013 (UTC){{Cn}} <sup>] (]) 00:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC)</sup> | |||
| ::Citing ] is meaningless: templates are used IN articles! ] (]) 00:00, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::Please read policy{{Where}} <sup>] (]) 01:24, 6 August 2013 (UTC)</sup> templates cannot use non-free media. ] (]) 00:16, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::] and ] are good places to start. Non-free media's usage is very restricted. Usage in templates is never allowed. ] (]) 01:29, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I did not notice this discussion until now and I can point out some information that could have avoided edit warring and the edit warring noticeboard, where both of you could be blocked for your actions. Per ], logos that consist of simple geometric shapes or a simple combination of shapes and text are not eligible for copyright here and could have been tagged with <nowiki>{{PD-textlogo}}</nowiki>. I see that the image is now replaced with a version at commons, which Werieth tagged for speedy deletion, another editor has removed this template as not qualifying and started a file deletion at . Hopefully both of you can discuss the image there. ] (]) 05:13, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::::WHAT THE?!? I just noticed that you reported Useddenim to the vandalism noticeboard, . I can tell you know that this will be rejected, because none of his edits were ], you need to read through that because there are very specific examples of what vandalism is, good faith edits on both of your parts are not vandalism. Also you gave Useddenim no warnings what so every, let alone the level four vandalism warning that should proceed posting to the noticeboard. You also did not alert Useddenim to let him know of your posting to the vandalism noticeboard. I am going to do that now, so he has a chance to reply. ] (]) 05:38, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| {{Archive bottom}} | |||
| == Your edits at ] == | |||
| While I been have an ongoing disucssion with Werieth about his other issues with NFCC images, I just now noticed both of your edits to ] and the discussion about it at Werieth's user page. The reason I am leaving a note on your page is that you too were edit warring on the template, so do not be surprised if you are also blocked. You also need to avoid launching personal attacks at other editors, , calling another editor a moron is inappropriate and takes away from your argument. Continued personal attacks could also result in you being blocked, so please stop them now. Thank you, ] (]) 05:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Also to let you know, Werieth reported you at ], , for vandalism. You should respond there if you get the chance before an admin accepts or rejects it. ] (]) 05:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Oh yes, of course—but ''he'' didn't bother with the courtesy of a warning… ] (]) 10:16, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :::I put a messages in that topic about how the whole thing could have been avoided and a second message about the AIV warning, but Werieth deleted it from his talk page, . So I will also let you know that he put your Commons image up for deletion at , so you can comment there since that was also in my messages that got deleted. ] (]) 10:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Template == | == Template == | ||
Revision as of 21:33, 6 September 2013
|
 Archives | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
MBTA color
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
AMT Templates
Hi, I like what you have done with the new templates for the Deux-Montagnes and Mascouche Lines, but they need improvement, because some colors (Saint-Jérôme for example) are default colors. If you are going to change the templates then make sure that they are clear and useful. Thanks! Mtlfiredude (talk) 21:47, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- Should be fixed now. (Pas tout le monde utîlisé dès accents.) Useddenim (talk) 23:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
I understand the accent problem. Will you fix the templates for all the other lines (so far only DM and Mascouche Lines have new templates)? I also do not understand some of the history on the templates (Monkland Station on the DM Line??). Mtlfiredude (talk) 03:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- I will update them as I have time, but I'll be going up North through the Simcoe Day weekend. (And see Template:AMT for the explanation of Monkland Station.) Useddenim (talk) 04:17, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
I see. I appreciate your fine template/history work on the AMT lines, very interesting. Just remember to make sure that the AMT logo is present before every line that crosses another one (you did this for Mont-Saint-Hilaire at Central Station but not for Saint-Jérôme). Have a great weekend! Mtlfiredude (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- Never mind the AMT logos, just the line color should be enough so you can remove them for the DM Line (I surely would do it for you but don't know how). Thanks again! Mtlfiredude (talk) 22:32, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Useddenim, I see you upgraded the templates for both Candiac and Saint-Jérôme Lines! That is very nice, and as you can see I thanked you for it. One thing, do not forget to get the real names of the lines (Delson-Candiac on the SJ Line, this is probably due to the fact that the old name is in the system). Also, for the SJ Line (and other future new templates), the colored squares representing the line color must be separated. But other than that, great work!! Mtlfiredude (talk) 13:13, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Useddenim, will you be updating the templates for MSH and VH lines any soon?
Done. Wow, great work. Try separating the Vaudreuil red and Candiac yellow squares (Saint-Jérôme Line) and the Mascouche pink and Deux-Montagnes blue squares (Mont-Saint-Hilaire Line) and everything will be perfect! Mtlfiredude (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Template
When you know that it is the wrong link, why don't you change it into the correct link? That is not illegal... The Banner talk 16:11, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
- I did make the correction; I don't understand what your comment refers to. (Altho' upon rereading, I guess I could have been a bit clearer with my edit summary…) Useddenim (talk) 16:18, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Virginia Railway Express colors
Why did you eliminate the colors at Template:VREX color? Did they make some change I didn't know about? -------User:DanTD (talk) 05:37, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Fixed. Sorry—typo on my part when I created the /doc. (If the colors don't show now, click on the link.) Useddenim (talk) 11:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't have to purge. They showed up. -------User:DanTD (talk) 12:27, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Shanghai Metro line templates
Hi, though this is a little late, but thanks for helping to redraw the templates of the Shanghai Metro lines 1-5. Thought these were quite eye-catching. :-)
Just some comments though - you seem to have, in particular, replaced the use of INT icons with bold / dotted lines as connectors of stations. I'm not too sure if this is particularly relevant though, because there are really few stations that adopt the virtual interchange scheme (so far only South Shaanxi Road Station that I know), and this new scheme of "connection" still looks slightly weird. Do you plan to change the templates for the remaining lines as well? NoNews! 13:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yes I do. I adopted the —/- - scheme since the old templates used text notation for virtual interchanges, and a mix of
(uINT) and
(HUB82※uBHF). The use of
(BL) connectors is well-established for the Hong Kong MTR RDTs—see {{HK-MTR route/West Rail}} for example. I reserved the HUBs for connection with associated mainline stations. Useddenim (talk) 23:18, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Barnstar!
|
The Template Barnstar | |
| I've just come across Template:Railways in Bridgwater RDT, which is amazingly detailed - I've not seen a better RDT on Misplaced Pages! Having frequently worked on route diagram templates, I realise how much work must've gone into it. Great job! Jr8825 • Talk 15:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC) |
Template:Amtrak
moved to Template talk:Amtrak