Misplaced Pages

User talk:ThinkEnemies: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:27, 11 September 2013 editThinkEnemies (talk | contribs)3,775 edits Block extended to indefinite: spaces← Previous edit Revision as of 18:40, 11 September 2013 edit undoThinkEnemies (talk | contribs)3,775 edits Voice of sanity and basic human decency: new sectionNext edit →
Line 39: Line 39:
I've extended your block to indefinite, as a result of your use of against another editor on top of a long history of tendentious, agenda-driven editing and edit-warring. You may appeal the block by ], including the {{tl|unblock}} template, the ], or by emailing the ]. ''']'''&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 18:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC) I've extended your block to indefinite, as a result of your use of against another editor on top of a long history of tendentious, agenda-driven editing and edit-warring. You may appeal the block by ], including the {{tl|unblock}} template, the ], or by emailing the ]. ''']'''&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 18:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
:{{reply to|MastCell}} I understand overreactions, I specialize in them -- But please don't fling feces at me by saying ThinkEnemies has a ''"long history of tendentious, agenda-driven editing."'' That statement is patently false. I shouldn't have attacked the person of Zippy. I shoudn't have edit-warred on the clear misrepresentation of a decade-old cited source and violation of LEDE. That is a fact. I have no problem accepting my punishment for these acts, but please don't make stuff up. It's cheap and rather petty of you. ]<u>]</u> 18:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC) :{{reply to|MastCell}} I understand overreactions, I specialize in them -- But please don't fling feces at me by saying ThinkEnemies has a ''"long history of tendentious, agenda-driven editing."'' That statement is patently false. I shouldn't have attacked the person of Zippy. I shoudn't have edit-warred on the clear misrepresentation of a decade-old cited source and violation of LEDE. That is a fact. I have no problem accepting my punishment for these acts, but please don't make stuff up. It's cheap and rather petty of you. ]<u>]</u> 18:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

== Voice of sanity and basic human decency ==

MastCell - https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Floquenbeam&diff=572516574&oldid=572516054

Great call MastCell -- The person who adhoms my political affiliation by saying I should edit conservapedia and claims ThinkEnemies is ''"incapable of collaboratively editing with people who don't think like "'' without providing diffs is the '''"voice of sanity and basic human decency"''', eh? God help us all. ]<u>]</u> 18:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:40, 11 September 2013


Archives (Index)



This page is archived by ClueBot III.
The Signpost
24 December 2024











Notice

Information icon Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:ThinkEnemies - personal attacks & NOTHERE. Thank you. ItsZippy 14:29, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Being that I'm still blocked, there's not much I can do to contribute. Glancing at that thread appears to show a personal attack against me (unsubstantiated sock puppetry claims), but I'm not offended as some blowback should be expected after my embarrassing outburst. All I can offer is heartfelt apologies. Oh, and I have no desire to edit conservapedia, which I always thought was a liberal troll site. Maybe it's just a troll site, period. Not really my cup of tea, either way. TETalk 17:05, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Block extended to indefinite

I've extended your block to indefinite, as a result of your use of homophobic slurs against another editor on top of a long history of tendentious, agenda-driven editing and edit-warring. You may appeal the block by the usual means, including the {{unblock}} template, the unblock ticket request system, or by emailing the Ban Appeals Subcommittee. MastCell  18:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

@MastCell: I understand overreactions, I specialize in them -- But please don't fling feces at me by saying ThinkEnemies has a "long history of tendentious, agenda-driven editing." That statement is patently false. I shouldn't have attacked the person of Zippy. I shoudn't have edit-warred on the clear misrepresentation of a decade-old cited source and violation of LEDE. That is a fact. I have no problem accepting my punishment for these acts, but please don't make stuff up. It's cheap and rather petty of you. TETalk 18:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Voice of sanity and basic human decency

MastCell - https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Floquenbeam&diff=572516574&oldid=572516054

Great call MastCell -- The person who adhoms my political affiliation by saying I should edit conservapedia and claims ThinkEnemies is "incapable of collaboratively editing with people who don't think like " without providing diffs is the "voice of sanity and basic human decency", eh? God help us all. TETalk 18:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)