Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
One edit is not Tendentious editing, putting amateur is not neutral, it is POV, it should be left simple philosopher with no qualifiers which is more neutral than any other option i.e. trained philosopher as it is the case of Ayn Rand or Amateur as you claim.
One edit is not Tendentious editing, putting amateur is not neutral, it is POV, it should be left simple philosopher with no qualifiers which is more neutral than any other option i.e. trained philosopher as it is the case of Ayn Rand or Amateur as you claim.
:Neutrality is defined with regard to our sources. Do not repeat your mistake. ] (]) 12:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
DagonAmiga, I see that IP 5.55.100.216 has commented on the Ayn Rand talkpage. Since you have created this WP account, you should use this account for editing and talk page comments. Misplaced Pages restricts the usage of multiple accounts, and using an IP account may be seen as WP:SOCKPUPPETRY. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 18:52, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
One edit is not Tendentious editing, putting amateur is not neutral, it is POV, it should be left simple philosopher with no qualifiers which is more neutral than any other option i.e. trained philosopher as it is the case of Ayn Rand or Amateur as you claim.