| Revision as of 18:54, 30 September 2013 view sourceJoy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators144,152 editsm Reverted edits by Obozedalteima (talk) to last version by AnomieBOT← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:57, 30 September 2013 view source Joy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators144,152 edits →HelloNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Please don't tag-spam articles without edit summaries or talk page discussions, it's easily considered disruptive. --] (]) 09:52, 30 September 2013 (UTC) | Please don't tag-spam articles without edit summaries or talk page discussions, it's easily considered disruptive. --] (]) 09:52, 30 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| : Repetitive assertions without any elaboration and ] are entirely counterproductive, and will lead to you getting blocked. Either explain the myriad of tags you insist on placing on a myriad of articles, or stop doing that, because a bland laundry list of tags with no corroboration is not actually helping any readers. --] (]) 18:57, 30 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:57, 30 September 2013
Hello
Why have you put so many tags on articles? What's the problem? If you think there's a serious neutrality problem, it would be a good idea to discuss it on the article's talkpage. bobrayner (talk) 07:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.
Please don't tag-spam articles without edit summaries or talk page discussions, it's easily considered disruptive. --Joy (talk) 09:52, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- Repetitive assertions without any elaboration and edit warring are entirely counterproductive, and will lead to you getting blocked. Either explain the myriad of tags you insist on placing on a myriad of articles, or stop doing that, because a bland laundry list of tags with no corroboration is not actually helping any readers. --Joy (talk) 18:57, 30 September 2013 (UTC)