Misplaced Pages

Open content: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:35, 21 December 2002 edit217.136.1.92 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 00:31, 1 January 2003 edit undoTakuyaMurata (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers89,986 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
'''Open content,''' coined by analogy with ''],'' describes any kind of creative work (for example, articles, pictures, audio, video, etc.) that is published under a non-restrictive copyright license and format that explicitly allows the copying of the information. (An example is the ], which is used by ] and ].) "Open content" is also sometimes used to describe content that can be modified by anyone. Of course, this is not without prior review by other participating parties--but there is no closed group like a commercial encyclopedia publisher which is responsible for all the editing. '''Open content,''' coined by analogy with ''],'' describes any kind of creative work (for example, articles, pictures, audio, video, etc.) that is published under a non-restrictive copyright license and format that explicitly allows the copying of the information. (An example is the ], which is used by ] and ].) "Open content" is also sometimes used to describe content that can be modified by anyone. Of course, this is not without prior review by other participating parties--but there is no closed group like a commercial encyclopedia publisher which is responsible for all the editing.


Just as open source software is sometimes described simply as ] (not to be confused with ]), open content materials can be more briefly described as free materials. But not every open content is free in the ] sense (for instance the ]). See ] and ]. Just as open source software is sometimes described simply as ] (not to be confused with ]), open content materials can be more briefly described as free materials. But not every open content is free in the ] sense (for instance the ]). See ], ] and ].


Open content projects: Open content projects:

Revision as of 00:31, 1 January 2003

Open content, coined by analogy with open source, describes any kind of creative work (for example, articles, pictures, audio, video, etc.) that is published under a non-restrictive copyright license and format that explicitly allows the copying of the information. (An example is the GNU Free Documentation License, which is used by Misplaced Pages and Nupedia.) "Open content" is also sometimes used to describe content that can be modified by anyone. Of course, this is not without prior review by other participating parties--but there is no closed group like a commercial encyclopedia publisher which is responsible for all the editing.

Just as open source software is sometimes described simply as free software (not to be confused with Freeware), open content materials can be more briefly described as free materials. But not every open content is free in the GNU GPL sense (for instance the Open Directory). See public domain, free content and free software movement.

Open content projects:

Licenses

External links