| Revision as of 03:13, 11 October 2013 editGschalet (talk | contribs)138 edits →Behavior Section← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:24, 9 November 2013 edit undoChetvorno (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users65,426 edits →Behavior Section: There is a lot in this section that is too general and should be edited down.Next edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| Undergraduate Peer Review (Washington University in St. Louis). The behavior section is highly informative, and I only made a few grammatical corrections., I would suggest adding citations for both the relatedness section and kin altruism section in order to elevate this article to “Good Article” status. Lastly, perhaps adding more information to the pheromones section would be helpful, such as a brief commentary on connections of genotype upon pheromones in the carpenter ant (how do genetic mutations affect pheromone levels and thereby influence social interactions between the workers, for instance). Adding additional examples in which these ants display kin altruism would be helpful as well. Overall, very strong work on this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gschalet (talk • contribs) 01:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)--] (]) 02:06, 11 October 2013 (UTC)gschalet | Undergraduate Peer Review (Washington University in St. Louis). The behavior section is highly informative, and I only made a few grammatical corrections., I would suggest adding citations for both the relatedness section and kin altruism section in order to elevate this article to “Good Article” status. Lastly, perhaps adding more information to the pheromones section would be helpful, such as a brief commentary on connections of genotype upon pheromones in the carpenter ant (how do genetic mutations affect pheromone levels and thereby influence social interactions between the workers, for instance). Adding additional examples in which these ants display kin altruism would be helpful as well. Overall, very strong work on this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gschalet (talk • contribs) 01:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)--] (]) 02:06, 11 October 2013 (UTC)gschalet | ||
| :The sections on "Relatedness", "Kin recognition", "Kin altruism", "Pheromones", and "Social immunity", while interesting, have a great deal of general information that is out of place here. Readers have to plow through a lot of exposition, then they find out there is nothing specific to carpenter ants in the section. I'd suggest that, except for "unusual" characteristics that are specific to a relatively few species of ants like oligogyny, that most of the rest be edited down to a few sentences. The stuff that applies to all social insects could be moved to ] if desired. Readers can go to the links if they want detailed explanations of ], ], and ]; that's what those article are for. --<font color="blue">]</font><sup>''<small>]</small>''</sup> 00:24, 9 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:24, 9 November 2013
 | Insects Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Indigenous countries
What countries do they appear in? it doesn't say.
Synonymous name of species
See Talk:Black_carpenter_ant--Wynler | Talk 20:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Worker... or a queen?
On the caption of the first figure, it says it depicts a worker. Deciding from the shape (and colour) of the specimen's thorax and size of it's abdomen, I'm pretty sure it's a queen, though. --Mosher81 (talk) 06:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed and changed.--FUNKAMATIC ~talk 22:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Merged Camponotus_saundersi
I merged the Camponotus_saundersi article here. For more details see:
Talk:Camponotus_saundersi#Common_name.3F and Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Camponotus_saundersi
Ikip (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Inch
Carpenter ants are large (¼–1 in)
I know this is English wiki, but many people not from Britain use the larger English wiki, and I at least have no idea how large an inch would be. Could you add something like '2 cm'? Please? :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.171.7.38 (talk) 13:26, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
someone deleted the symbiont section by mistake
someone deleted the symbiont section by mistake
Can anyone verify this ?
- Routine vandalism. I reverted it. Art LaPella (talk) 18:08, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
wood
i know a quite a few ant speies from the genus "camponotus", which don't live in wood. do they not count as carpenter ants? בלנק (talk) 15:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Behavior Section
I edited the behavior section. The section on relatedness needs to be cited.Kaijones5245 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaijones5245 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Undergraduate Peer Review (Washington University in St. Louis). The behavior section is highly informative, and I only made a few grammatical corrections., I would suggest adding citations for both the relatedness section and kin altruism section in order to elevate this article to “Good Article” status. Lastly, perhaps adding more information to the pheromones section would be helpful, such as a brief commentary on connections of genotype upon pheromones in the carpenter ant (how do genetic mutations affect pheromone levels and thereby influence social interactions between the workers, for instance). Adding additional examples in which these ants display kin altruism would be helpful as well. Overall, very strong work on this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gschalet (talk • contribs) 01:50, 11 October 2013 (UTC)--Gschalet (talk) 02:06, 11 October 2013 (UTC)gschalet
- The sections on "Relatedness", "Kin recognition", "Kin altruism", "Pheromones", and "Social immunity", while interesting, have a great deal of general information that is out of place here. Readers have to plow through a lot of exposition, then they find out there is nothing specific to carpenter ants in the section. I'd suggest that, except for "unusual" characteristics that are specific to a relatively few species of ants like oligogyny, that most of the rest be edited down to a few sentences. The stuff that applies to all social insects could be moved to Social insect if desired. Readers can go to the links if they want detailed explanations of kin altruism, kin recognition, and pheromones; that's what those article are for. --Chetvorno 00:24, 9 November 2013 (UTC)