Misplaced Pages

Talk:France/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:France Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:55, 3 January 2013 editCanthusus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,482 editsm Reverted 1 edit by Choc2 (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Jez2k. (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 05:20, 17 November 2013 edit undoTimmeh.Chan (talk | contribs)3 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Edit Request - Literature Section:
"Jean de La Fontaine is one of the most famous fabulist of that time, as he wrote hundreds of fables, some being far more famous than others, such as The Ant and the Grasshopper."

Upon reading the article on "The Ant and the Grasshopper" - Fontaine was _reinterpreting_ Aesop's Fables.

Edit request Edit request



Revision as of 05:20, 17 November 2013

Edit Request - Literature Section: "Jean de La Fontaine is one of the most famous fabulist of that time, as he wrote hundreds of fables, some being far more famous than others, such as The Ant and the Grasshopper."

Upon reading the article on "The Ant and the Grasshopper" - Fontaine was _reinterpreting_ Aesop's Fables.

Edit request

Hi, in the fourth paragraph of the introduction there is a link that states France has the fourth largest nominal military budget, but when you click on the link the article states it has the fifth largest budget. Could someone check please.

Cheers


In the Prehistory section, it states:

"The oldest traces of human life in what is now France date from approximately 1,800,000 years ago."

Sorry, but humans have not been around than long. Misplaced Pages's own article on humans states they originated in Africa some 200,000 years ago, one 9th of the time stated in this article. The citation is 25 years old and is now obviously superceded.