| Revision as of 04:49, 6 February 2006 edit71.125.47.180 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:38, 12 June 2006 edit undo204.168.120.178 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{fac}} | |||
| ==Areas of contention== | ==Areas of contention== | ||
| Looks like there's a slow-motion edit-war underway here. | Looks like there's a slow-motion edit-war underway here. | ||
Revision as of 20:38, 12 June 2006
{{FAC}} should be substituted at the top of the article talk page
Areas of contention
Looks like there's a slow-motion edit-war underway here.
We may have to resort to Misplaced Pages:Resolving_disputes
In particular, I'm noting edits from one or many anonymous contributors posting that
- ) Orthodox jews have exerted a negative influence since the '90s
- ) Persians don't care as much as Asians or Ashkenazis about the public schools.
These are volatile subjects. Both of these positions are worthy of discussion, and are (in theory) defensible without descending into name-calling. The question at hand, however, is whether they can be supported as FACT. Bring primary sources. Only then can we have an even playing field for rational discourse.
I recommend that everybody take a breath and re-read Misplaced Pages:Neutral_point_of_view, and Misplaced Pages:Cite_sources\
--Vonfraginoff 23:32, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
The second paragraph of the history section is terribly written, and virtually unreadable, could someone please rewrite