Revision as of 17:47, 27 November 2013 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits No verification of the text provided. See WP:V.← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:26, 2 December 2013 edit undoMiddle 8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,254 edits White 2004, 5-in-one-millionNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==White 2004, 5-in-one-million== | |||
You've been repeating the assertion that White 2004 (aka "the older source" for adverse events) does not contain the 5-in-one-million number. | |||
From : "According to the evidence from 12 prospective studies which surveyed more than a million treatments, the risk of a serious adverse event with acupuncture is estimated to be 0.05 per 10,000 treatments." | |||
Can we agree that 0.05 in 10,000 = 5 in one million without debate? --] (]) 05:26, 2 December 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:26, 2 December 2013
White 2004, 5-in-one-million
You've been repeating the assertion that White 2004 (aka "the older source" for adverse events) does not contain the 5-in-one-million number.
From White 2004: "According to the evidence from 12 prospective studies which surveyed more than a million treatments, the risk of a serious adverse event with acupuncture is estimated to be 0.05 per 10,000 treatments."
Can we agree that 0.05 in 10,000 = 5 in one million without debate? --Middle 8 (talk) 05:26, 2 December 2013 (UTC)