| Revision as of 17:58, 7 December 2013 editDeepfriedokra (talk | contribs)Administrators173,531 edits →7 December 2013: more← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:56, 7 December 2013 edit undoJni (talk | contribs)Administrators21,133 edits →7 December 2013: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| This is a duck used to covertly add material that has been deleted per ]. The sock signature edit is: . Other edits are almost solely related to very narrow topic in biochemistry field and match closely edits made by other indef. blocked Isaacatm/Olatunde socks like ] and ]. ] (]) 16:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC) | This is a duck used to covertly add material that has been deleted per ]. The sock signature edit is: . Other edits are almost solely related to very narrow topic in biochemistry field and match closely edits made by other indef. blocked Isaacatm/Olatunde socks like ] and ]. ] (]) 16:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :other than seeing a biochemistry edit set I don't understand, I see nothing conclusive. Blocked prophylactically and then unblocked with my apologies. There is that one troubling edit. Maybe it's him. Can't be sure.]] 17:56, 7 December 2013 (UTC) | :other than seeing a biochemistry edit set I don't understand, I see nothing conclusive. Blocked prophylactically and then unblocked with my apologies. There is that one troubling edit. Maybe it's him. Can't be sure.]] 17:56, 7 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::This account was created almost immediately after the other Isaacatm socks were blocked. Do you think it is a coincidence that this new user tweaks references to little-known reseach papers about '']'', an article created by sockpuppet ]? The edits appear constructive, but someone should verify the references just in case this isn't some kind of sneaky vandalism/hoax (I haven't done that yet, I have concentrated on deleting the remaining references to this Olalekan self-promoter from Misplaced Pages - except these citations to scientific papers as they might be valid sources even if the purpose of their insertion is to promote this non-notable researcher.) Suggest sleeper sweep to see if there are any more accounts. ] (]) 18:56, 7 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | ||
Revision as of 18:56, 7 December 2013
Isaacatm
Isaacatm (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Isaacatm/Archive.
7 December 2013
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Sixtyn (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
This is a duck used to covertly add material that has been deleted per Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Olatunde_olalekan. The sock signature edit is: . Other edits are almost solely related to very narrow topic in biochemistry field and match closely edits made by other indef. blocked Isaacatm/Olatunde socks like Special:Contributions/Biomolecules and Special:Contributions/Ainakan. jni (talk) 16:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- other than seeing a biochemistry edit set I don't understand, I see nothing conclusive. Blocked prophylactically and then unblocked with my apologies. There is that one troubling edit. Maybe it's him. Can't be sure. Dlohcierekim 17:56, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- This account was created almost immediately after the other Isaacatm socks were blocked. Do you think it is a coincidence that this new user tweaks references to little-known reseach papers about Solanum anguivi, an article created by sockpuppet User:Biomolecules? The edits appear constructive, but someone should verify the references just in case this isn't some kind of sneaky vandalism/hoax (I haven't done that yet, I have concentrated on deleting the remaining references to this Olalekan self-promoter from Misplaced Pages - except these citations to scientific papers as they might be valid sources even if the purpose of their insertion is to promote this non-notable researcher.) Suggest sleeper sweep to see if there are any more accounts. jni (talk) 18:56, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: