| Revision as of 18:56, 7 December 2013 editJni (talk | contribs)Administrators21,122 edits →7 December 2013: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:49, 7 December 2013 edit undoSixtyn (talk | contribs)22 edits →Comments by other usersNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | ||
| My fellow editors,I thank you all for your impact on wikipedia. I got a notice that am suspected of sockpuppet. I don't see any reason for me to create multiple accounts on wikipedia. And I want to use this medium to tell you that my new account has nothing to do with the suspects; Isaacatm,biomolecules ainakan and any other user or the article about the non-notable researcher. Although my computer had a serious problem due to virus infection and I had been visiting a comercial computer center were I pay to browse per hour. I don't know If any of the above suspects of sockpuppet also uses the same browsing center because its not my juridition to be monitoring anybody that visit the same computer center so I wouldn't know if any one is using the same Ip to abuse wikipedia. Although I appear more like a new user.Am not realy a new user I once have an account on wikipedia but I lost the diary that contain the pin and username. That's why I created a new one you see as “sixtyn”. Esteem wikipedian,let's not punish the inoccent ones for what they knows nothing about. And I believe that we all have the same goal. Thank you for the investigation but my user his inoccent of the allegation.(] (]) 22:49, 7 December 2013 (UTC)) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
Revision as of 22:49, 7 December 2013
Isaacatm
Isaacatm (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Isaacatm/Archive.
7 December 2013
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Sixtyn (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
This is a duck used to covertly add material that has been deleted per Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Olatunde_olalekan. The sock signature edit is: . Other edits are almost solely related to very narrow topic in biochemistry field and match closely edits made by other indef. blocked Isaacatm/Olatunde socks like Special:Contributions/Biomolecules and Special:Contributions/Ainakan. jni (talk) 16:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- other than seeing a biochemistry edit set I don't understand, I see nothing conclusive. Blocked prophylactically and then unblocked with my apologies. There is that one troubling edit. Maybe it's him. Can't be sure. Dlohcierekim 17:56, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
- This account was created almost immediately after the other Isaacatm socks were blocked. Do you think it is a coincidence that this new user tweaks references to little-known reseach papers about Solanum anguivi, an article created by sockpuppet User:Biomolecules? The edits appear constructive, but someone should verify the references just in case this isn't some kind of sneaky vandalism/hoax (I haven't done that yet, I have concentrated on deleting the remaining references to this Olalekan self-promoter from Misplaced Pages - except these citations to scientific papers as they might be valid sources even if the purpose of their insertion is to promote this non-notable researcher.) Suggest sleeper sweep to see if there are any more accounts. jni (talk) 18:56, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. My fellow editors,I thank you all for your impact on wikipedia. I got a notice that am suspected of sockpuppet. I don't see any reason for me to create multiple accounts on wikipedia. And I want to use this medium to tell you that my new account has nothing to do with the suspects; Isaacatm,biomolecules ainakan and any other user or the article about the non-notable researcher. Although my computer had a serious problem due to virus infection and I had been visiting a comercial computer center were I pay to browse per hour. I don't know If any of the above suspects of sockpuppet also uses the same browsing center because its not my juridition to be monitoring anybody that visit the same computer center so I wouldn't know if any one is using the same Ip to abuse wikipedia. Although I appear more like a new user.Am not realy a new user I once have an account on wikipedia but I lost the diary that contain the pin and username. That's why I created a new one you see as “sixtyn”. Esteem wikipedian,let's not punish the inoccent ones for what they knows nothing about. And I believe that we all have the same goal. Thank you for the investigation but my user his inoccent of the allegation.(Sixtyn (talk) 22:49, 7 December 2013 (UTC))
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: