Misplaced Pages

Digital philosophy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:28, 26 May 2004 editTittoAssini (talk | contribs)283 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:41, 12 September 2004 edit undo134.124.56.187 (talk) Fredkin was misspelled as FrenkinNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Digital philosophy is a new movement in philosophy advocated by prominent scientists such as Edward Frenkin, ], and G.J. Chaitin. It is basically a modern re-interpretation of ]'s ], as it substitutes the monad with ] ]. Digital physics conjectures that the universe is a special type of ] that is Turing complete. Digital philosophy is a new movement in philosophy advocated by prominent scientists such as Edward Fredkin, ], and G.J. Chaitin. It is basically a modern re-interpretation of ]'s ], as it substitutes the monad with ] ]. Digital physics conjectures that the universe is a special type of ] that is Turing complete.


The digital approach in metaphysics promises to solve the hard problems in philosophy of mind and physics, since the mind can be given a computational treatment following the footsteps of Leibniz, and dispenses with the non-deterministic essentialism of (Copenhagen interpretation of) quantum theory. In a digital universe, existence is equivalent to computation, and so is thought. Thus computation is the single substance of a monist metaphysics, while subjectivity is constructed through universal computation. (This intriguing approach to epistemology has been dubbed Multism, since it posits the existence of multiple universes.) The digital approach in metaphysics promises to solve the hard problems in philosophy of mind and physics, since the mind can be given a computational treatment following the footsteps of Leibniz, and dispenses with the non-deterministic essentialism of (Copenhagen interpretation of) quantum theory. In a digital universe, existence is equivalent to computation, and so is thought. Thus computation is the single substance of a monist metaphysics, while subjectivity is constructed through universal computation. (This intriguing approach to epistemology has been dubbed Multism, since it posits the existence of multiple universes.)
Line 9: Line 9:
Links: Links:




-- --

Revision as of 22:41, 12 September 2004

Digital philosophy is a new movement in philosophy advocated by prominent scientists such as Edward Fredkin, Stephen Wolfram, and G.J. Chaitin. It is basically a modern re-interpretation of Leibniz's metaphysics, as it substitutes the monad with digital computation. Digital physics conjectures that the universe is a special type of cellular automata that is Turing complete.

The digital approach in metaphysics promises to solve the hard problems in philosophy of mind and physics, since the mind can be given a computational treatment following the footsteps of Leibniz, and dispenses with the non-deterministic essentialism of (Copenhagen interpretation of) quantum theory. In a digital universe, existence is equivalent to computation, and so is thought. Thus computation is the single substance of a monist metaphysics, while subjectivity is constructed through universal computation. (This intriguing approach to epistemology has been dubbed Multism, since it posits the existence of multiple universes.)

There is a newsgroup called sci.physics.discrete and two mailing lists, namely digitalphilosophy and digitalphysics, on yahoogroups.com

-- talk about multism, algorithmic information theory, etc. --

Links:

Ed Fredkin's digital philosophy page

-- Eray Ozkural

See Digital physics.