| Revision as of 00:59, 19 December 2013 editSpc 21 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users23,706 edits →Infobox dates← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:01, 19 December 2013 edit undoVanished user 201913 (talk | contribs)96,104 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Hi, the standard approach for updating the {{para|pcupdate}} or {{para|club-update}} infobox parameter is adding a timestamp by writing five tildes (<nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki>). This is laid out at ], which reads: "A timestamp at which the player's infobox club statistics are correct (not needed if the player has retired)." Cheers, ] (]) 00:50, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | Hi, the standard approach for updating the {{para|pcupdate}} or {{para|club-update}} infobox parameter is adding a timestamp by writing five tildes (<nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki>). This is laid out at ], which reads: "A timestamp at which the player's infobox club statistics are correct (not needed if the player has retired)." Cheers, ] (]) 00:50, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| : So basically using match played is exactly the same and doesn't look as odd as some random time. I understand it's a highly controversial issue though. Cheers.... ] (]) 00:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | : So basically using match played is exactly the same and doesn't look as odd as some random time. I understand it's a highly controversial issue though. Cheers.... ] (]) 00:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| See mate SPC, i was not making up. Regards both. --] (]) 01:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:01, 19 December 2013
Infobox dates
Hi, the standard approach for updating the |pcupdate= or |club-update= infobox parameter is adding a timestamp by writing five tildes (~~~~~). This is laid out at Template:Infobox football biography#Parameters, which reads: "A timestamp at which the player's infobox club statistics are correct (not needed if the player has retired)." Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 00:50, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- So basically using match played is exactly the same and doesn't look as odd as some random time. I understand it's a highly controversial issue though. Cheers.... Spc 21 (talk) 00:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
See mate SPC, i was not making up. Regards both. --AL (talk) 01:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC)