Misplaced Pages

Marian Dawkins: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:15, 30 December 2013 edit124.168.53.242 (talk) no, it is reliable source, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:SOURCES#Reliable_sourcesTag: possible BLP issue or vandalism← Previous edit Revision as of 23:22, 30 December 2013 edit undoI am One of Many (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,505 edits Reverted 1 edit by 124.168.53.242 (talk): This is negative content added to a WP:BLP. Find a reliable source or do not add it back in. (TW)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Marian Stamp Dawkins''' is professor for ] at the ] <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.zoo.ox.ac.uk/staff/academics/dawkins_m.htm | publisher= University of Oxford, Department of Zoology | title= Staff:Academic Marian Dawkins |accessdate= 1 July 2011 }}</ref> She has published several books, one of which has been translated into ], and many peer-reviewed papers. Her research interests include ], ], ], ] and ]. '''Marian Stamp Dawkins''' is professor for ] at the ] <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.zoo.ox.ac.uk/staff/academics/dawkins_m.htm | publisher= University of Oxford, Department of Zoology | title= Staff:Academic Marian Dawkins |accessdate= 1 July 2011 }}</ref> She has published several books, one of which has been translated into ], and many peer-reviewed papers. Her research interests include ], ], ], ] and ].


She is skeptical about consciousness of nonhuman animals. In her book ''Why Animals Matter: Animal Consciousness, Animal Welfare, and Human Well-being'' (2012) she wrote "there is no proof either way about animal consciousness and that it does not serve animals well to claim that there is". Many have criticised this position. Evolutionary biologist ] vigorously criticized Dawkins for denying a large body of solid scientific data<ref name="MB">http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/animal-emotions/201205/animal-consciousness-and-science-matter</ref>. Jennifer O'Connor considered the book 'appears to be nothing more than a defense for those who want to continue to use, abuse and exploit animals'. Jim Robertson wrote "This new and unwelcomed project makes me wonder if she's (Dawkins is) not actually an emotional automaton programmed to react to stimuli but lacking the ability to think and feel". The book is rated 1.5 out of total 5 stars on Amazon.com.<ref>Criticisms of Why Animals Matter: Animal Consciousness, Animal Welfare, and Human Well-being from the readers: http://www.amazon.com/review/RN2RMW41H7IP3/ref=cm_cr_dp_cmt?ie=UTF8&ASIN=0199747512&channel=detail-glance&nodeID=283155&store=books#wasThisHelpful http://www.amazon.com/Why-Animals-Matter-Consciousness-Well-being/dp/0199747512</ref> She is skeptical about consciousness of nonhuman animals. In her book ''Why Animals Matter: Animal Consciousness, Animal Welfare, and Human Well-being'' (2012) she wrote "there is no proof either way about animal consciousness and that it does not serve animals well to claim that there is". Evolutionary biologist ] vigorously criticized Dawkins for denying a large body of solid scientific data<ref name="MB">http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/animal-emotions/201205/animal-consciousness-and-science-matter</ref>. She responded the criticism to her position as "wrongly interpreted", and says that "my concern is to make the case for animal emotions as watertight as possible and thereby to strengthen it. That is the way science progresses and always has."<ref>Dawkins, Marian Stamp (2012) ''Huffington Post'', 8 June 2012.</ref><ref>Dawkins, Marian Stamp (2013) ''Edge'', 31 October 2013.</ref>
She was also criticized for unprofessional academic conducts such as personal attack and misrepresentation of the opinions of the academic opponents.<ref name="MB"></ref>
She responded the criticism as "wrongly interpreted", and says that "my concern is to make the case for animal emotions as watertight as possible and thereby to strengthen it. That is the way science progresses and always has."<ref>Dawkins, Marian Stamp (2012) ''Huffington Post'', 8 June 2012.</ref><ref>Dawkins, Marian Stamp (2013) ''Edge'', 31 October 2013.</ref>


==Bibliography== ==Bibliography==

Revision as of 23:22, 30 December 2013

Marian Stamp Dawkins is professor for animal behaviour at the University of Oxford She has published several books, one of which has been translated into German, and many peer-reviewed papers. Her research interests include vision in birds, animal signalling, behavioural synchrony, animal consciousness and animal welfare.

She is skeptical about consciousness of nonhuman animals. In her book Why Animals Matter: Animal Consciousness, Animal Welfare, and Human Well-being (2012) she wrote "there is no proof either way about animal consciousness and that it does not serve animals well to claim that there is". Evolutionary biologist Marc Bekoff vigorously criticized Dawkins for denying a large body of solid scientific data. She responded the criticism to her position as "wrongly interpreted", and says that "my concern is to make the case for animal emotions as watertight as possible and thereby to strengthen it. That is the way science progresses and always has."

Bibliography

References

  1. "Staff:Academic Marian Dawkins". University of Oxford, Department of Zoology. Retrieved 1 July 2011.
  2. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/animal-emotions/201205/animal-consciousness-and-science-matter
  3. Dawkins, Marian Stamp (2012) Convincing the Unconvinced That Animal Welfare Matters Huffington Post, 8 June 2012.
  4. Dawkins, Marian Stamp (2013) What do animals want? Edge, 31 October 2013.

Template:Persondata

Stub icon

This article about a British scientist is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: