| Revision as of 02:29, 4 January 2014 editSunuraju (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,717 edits →I have unreviewed a page you curated← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:38, 5 January 2014 edit undoJmintuck (talk | contribs)25 edits →Happy HolidaysNext edit → | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| ==Happy Holidays== | ==Happy Holidays== | ||
| ...] (]) 03:31, 25 December 2013 (UTC) | ...] (]) 03:31, 25 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
| No happy holidays to you | |||
| == Speedy deletion declined: ] == | == Speedy deletion declined: ] == | ||
Revision as of 02:38, 5 January 2014
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
You're invited: Art & Feminism Edit-a-thon
| Art & Feminism Edit-a-Thon - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
| File:Csaky madonna.jpg | Hi Freshacconci! The first ever Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2014 across the United States and Canada - including Montreal! Wikipedians of all experience levels are welcome to join! Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors. |
Happy Holidays
...Modernist (talk) 03:31, 25 December 2013 (UTC) No happy holidays to you
Speedy deletion declined: Lily Lanken
Hello Freshacconci. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lily Lanken, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 11:12, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- To WP:AFD? There is some significance asserted, but Ms Lanken might not be a notable member of - for lack of better words - the Wainwright/McGarrigle clan. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
NFCC abuse
Do you want blocked? A WP:NFCR determined that the files needed removed. Werieth (talk) 16:34, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- A how exactly will you block me? You are restricted in your edits on images, as you are a problem editor. I would avoid threatening other editors over good faith edits if I were you.freshacconci talk to me 16:37, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Actually I am under no technical editing restrictions. A NFCR is the equivalent of an FFD or AfD, you cannot revert the close because you disagree with the outcome. Werieth (talk) 16:39, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, you are restricted to one revert as you are a difficult editor. I am not aware of any outcome as I was not part of any such discussion. The image is justified under fair use. Do not threaten me again and stay off my talk page.freshacconci talk to me 16:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Actually I am under no technical editing restrictions. A NFCR is the equivalent of an FFD or AfD, you cannot revert the close because you disagree with the outcome. Werieth (talk) 16:39, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Avalament
Hello. I have just removed the speedy deletion template you placed on this article. Misplaced Pages:Criteria for Speedy Deletion specifically and unambiguously states that NOTDICTIONARY is not a valid criteria for speedy deletion. Please read the criteria for speedy deletion very carefully before placing any more CSD templates. Thank you. James500 (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'm well-aware of speedy deletion criteria and fully intend to place a CSD whenever I come across and article needing it. And I know that admins have some leeway with odd-ball articles. But now we have this silly article that will have to be AfD'd and waste a lot of time. Nice. freshacconci talk to me 19:22, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Mahesh Dalgade, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. - MrX 21:11, 2 January 2014 (UTC)