| Revision as of 18:06, 8 January 2014 editShallowmead077 (talk | contribs)586 edits →January 2014← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:18, 8 January 2014 edit undoJayaguru-Shishya (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,964 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| ::Firstly, I'd ask you to provide diffs of talk page posts being removed. Secondly, even if that has happened, it doesn't negate the fact you ''are'' edit warring. Finally, I think you need to read ], which I have linked you too numerous times. All everyone else is doing is reverting to the status quo, while you are actively trying to ''change'' things. No one else is changing anything, they're just reverting to the version which last had consensus. If you have an issue you have to take it to the talk page ''first'', and then alter it ''after'' you have consensus. So far, you do not have consensus. When multiple editors keep reverting you, it should be a clue that you're doing something wrong. Until your version is agreed upon, the old version stays: it's as simple as that. Now I'd ask you to stop edit warring and simply talk things out first. — '''''] ]''''' 23:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC) | ::Firstly, I'd ask you to provide diffs of talk page posts being removed. Secondly, even if that has happened, it doesn't negate the fact you ''are'' edit warring. Finally, I think you need to read ], which I have linked you too numerous times. All everyone else is doing is reverting to the status quo, while you are actively trying to ''change'' things. No one else is changing anything, they're just reverting to the version which last had consensus. If you have an issue you have to take it to the talk page ''first'', and then alter it ''after'' you have consensus. So far, you do not have consensus. When multiple editors keep reverting you, it should be a clue that you're doing something wrong. Until your version is agreed upon, the old version stays: it's as simple as that. Now I'd ask you to stop edit warring and simply talk things out first. — '''''] ]''''' 23:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :::He posted on my user page, not on my talk page. --] (]) 18:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC) | :::He posted on my user page, not on my talk page. --] (]) 18:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::Dear Richard BB, as I have told you numerous times: there is an on-going discussion at the talk page, one which you have not attended to. You just keep rudely reverting the edits even without discussing the changes at the talk pages. | |||
| :::So far, I have presented the very grounds for the changes I have made; it has been open for discussion at the talk pages; and it has not been opposed. | |||
| :::Therefore, stop reverting the edits and please participate the discussion at the talk pages if you should have any further doubts. Thanks. ] (]) 18:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:18, 8 January 2014
Welcome!
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, Jayaguru-Shishya! Thank you for your contributions. I am Aoidh and I have been editing Misplaced Pages for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Misplaced Pages:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Aoidh (talk) (formerly User:SudoGhost) 16:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
August 2013
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Arhat (Buddhism) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arhat (Buddhism) was changed by Jayaguru-Shishya (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913283 on 2013-08-30T14:00:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Genre bickering:
Please stop your random biased genre bickering particularly on the stoner rock related bands and artists. It seems you're desperately removing them whether including or excluding sources. If you've got any problem please be patient, discuss on talk page and wait for a general consensus.--Shallowmead077 (talk) 11:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
"DO NOT REMOVE OR EDIT THE ENTRIES ON TALK PAGE"
Please show me the edit where I did this (hint: I didn't). You should check the talk page history before you go shouting at other editors. Kaini (talk) 09:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
Your recent editing history at Stoner rock shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Richard BB 18:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Dear Richard BB, there is no on-going edit-warring. No more on my part than, for example Shallowmead077's part. There is a Misplaced Pages rule that entries made on talk pages should not be removed. However, certain writers do that after each single entry.
- When it comes to articles, there are on-going discussions at the talk page, ones which the other contributors who keep reverting every single change refuse to attend to. Besides, they are involved in reverting as much as I do + 1, so please point your claiming finger equally to them.
- Every single time I have removed some section, it's since there are no grounds ever so far for the claims represented; the sources do not make such statement they are referred to support even, the sources are completely unreliable, etc. It is not my part to proove that "God doesn't exist". If one makes a claim without sources, it is his/her obligation to prove it right, not the other way around. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 20:28, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Firstly, I'd ask you to provide diffs of talk page posts being removed. Secondly, even if that has happened, it doesn't negate the fact you are edit warring. Finally, I think you need to read WP:BRD, which I have linked you too numerous times. All everyone else is doing is reverting to the status quo, while you are actively trying to change things. No one else is changing anything, they're just reverting to the version which last had consensus. If you have an issue you have to take it to the talk page first, and then alter it after you have consensus. So far, you do not have consensus. When multiple editors keep reverting you, it should be a clue that you're doing something wrong. Until your version is agreed upon, the old version stays: it's as simple as that. Now I'd ask you to stop edit warring and simply talk things out first. — Richard BB 23:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- He posted on my user page, not on my talk page. --Shallowmead077 (talk) 18:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Dear Richard BB, as I have told you numerous times: there is an on-going discussion at the talk page, one which you have not attended to. You just keep rudely reverting the edits even without discussing the changes at the talk pages.
- So far, I have presented the very grounds for the changes I have made; it has been open for discussion at the talk pages; and it has not been opposed.
- Therefore, stop reverting the edits and please participate the discussion at the talk pages if you should have any further doubts. Thanks. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 18:18, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- He posted on my user page, not on my talk page. --Shallowmead077 (talk) 18:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Firstly, I'd ask you to provide diffs of talk page posts being removed. Secondly, even if that has happened, it doesn't negate the fact you are edit warring. Finally, I think you need to read WP:BRD, which I have linked you too numerous times. All everyone else is doing is reverting to the status quo, while you are actively trying to change things. No one else is changing anything, they're just reverting to the version which last had consensus. If you have an issue you have to take it to the talk page first, and then alter it after you have consensus. So far, you do not have consensus. When multiple editors keep reverting you, it should be a clue that you're doing something wrong. Until your version is agreed upon, the old version stays: it's as simple as that. Now I'd ask you to stop edit warring and simply talk things out first. — Richard BB 23:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)