| Revision as of 18:47, 9 January 2014 editWolbo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors236,412 edits Talkback← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:31, 10 January 2014 edit undoCapricornmanager1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users796 edits →reverting with no reasonNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :Thanks for answering. Because all the other charts are top ten and people start expanding them to top 12, top 13, top 15. Why have one chart in the article at top 15? It looks out of place. ] (]) 09:35, 5 April 2011 (UTC) | :Thanks for answering. Because all the other charts are top ten and people start expanding them to top 12, top 13, top 15. Why have one chart in the article at top 15? It looks out of place. ] (]) 09:35, 5 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| Not all the other charts are top 10! However, it is correct that all charts now are "cut" down to max top 10. I for one do not agree with that as a general good rule but ok.. | Not all the other charts are top 10! However, it is correct that all charts now are "cut" down to max top 10. I for one do not agree with that as a general good rule but ok.. (11:21, 5 April 2011 (UTC)) | ||
| Reg. the rankings, firstly, I do not agree that it looks out of place. If anything it fits the section "ATP Ranking" | |||
| Secondly, the main reason for having a top 15 (for no. 1 ranking) is the same as I posted it in my first answer . (11:21, 5 April 2011 (UTC)) | |||
| ==Talkback== | ==Talkback== | ||
Revision as of 22:31, 10 January 2014
Welcome
Hello, Capricornmanager1, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. The New Mikemoral Happy editing! Mikemoral♪♫ 20:18, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Tennis_statistics#Proposal
A proposal has been put forward to replace Tennis statistics with User:Fyunck(click)/SandboxTennisStats and name it List of non-Grand Slam tennis statistics and records. Thoughts, comments and/or votes are encouraged. SilkTork * 08:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
reverting with no reason
Why would you keep reverting two charts in ATP World Tour records where the rest of the charts have a top 10? A top 10 is pretty normal for charts and I see no explanation in your edit summaries as to why you reverted. It is important that you add summaries whenever you revert (or actually whenever you edit). Please leave it at 10. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- since you edited once and I see no response I'm changing it back. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Why have you reverted these 2 charts from top 15 to 10 in the first place? Very few players have had the number 1 ranking, therefore it is very relevant to include these. Please leave it at top 15. Thank you. (Capricornmanager1 (talk) 09:04, 5 April 2011 (UTC))
- Thanks for answering. Because all the other charts are top ten and people start expanding them to top 12, top 13, top 15. Why have one chart in the article at top 15? It looks out of place. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:35, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Not all the other charts are top 10! However, it is correct that all charts now are "cut" down to max top 10. I for one do not agree with that as a general good rule but ok.. (11:21, 5 April 2011 (UTC))
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.