| Revision as of 16:22, 18 November 2013 editGaijin42 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers20,866 edits →merge: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:27, 21 January 2014 edit undoAndy Dingley (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers160,530 edits →mergeNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Although certainly expansion of the section should go into this dedicated article, per ] I think some mention of the 3d printed firearms issue does need to remain in the 3d printing main article. ] (]) 16:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC) | Although certainly expansion of the section should go into this dedicated article, per ] I think some mention of the 3d printed firearms issue does need to remain in the 3d printing main article. ] (]) 16:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Oppose''' There's enough external interest and coverage of firearms specifically to justify this separate article. ] (]) 21:27, 21 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:27, 21 January 2014
There is a notice that says, "This article is an orphan," but the section "3D printers" in the article "Improvised firearm" links here with "Main article: 3D printed firearms". I read the guidelines for orphan articles, and it doesn't say these don't count towards being non-orphaned, as far as I know. Sorry, I'm rather new to this. I don't even know what to do on a talk page. F16falcona46 (talk) 00:50, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- The tag is usually added for fewer than 3 inbound links, but if you think it's already "linked as much as is justified", then go ahead and detag it. As this article has 3 links anyway: Special:WhatLinksHere/3D_printed_firearms (and surely needs one from Defense Distributed too), It's pretty moot. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
merge
Although certainly expansion of the section should go into this dedicated article, per WP:SUMMARY I think some mention of the 3d printed firearms issue does need to remain in the 3d printing main article. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose There's enough external interest and coverage of firearms specifically to justify this separate article. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:27, 21 January 2014 (UTC)