Misplaced Pages

Comparison of specialized computer-aided audit tools: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:45, 18 October 2013 editDavissmd (talk | contribs)2 edits Added TopCAATs to comparison← Previous edit Revision as of 16:59, 29 January 2014 edit undoSomeone not using his real name (talk | contribs)11,896 edits Nominated for deletion; see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Comparison of specialized computer-aided audit tools. (TW)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled -->
{{Article for deletion/dated|page=Comparison of specialized computer-aided audit tools|timestamp=20140129165928|year=2014|month=January|day=29|substed=yes|help=off}}
<!-- For administrator use only: {{Old AfD multi|page=Comparison of specialized computer-aided audit tools|date=29 January 2014|result='''keep'''}} -->
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2013}} {{Use dmy dates|date=May 2013}}
{{merge to|Computer-aided audit tools|date=July 2012}} {{merge to|Computer-aided audit tools|date=July 2012}}

Revision as of 16:59, 29 January 2014

An editor has nominated this article for deletion.
You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it.Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed. For more information, see the guide to deletion.
Find sources: "Comparison of specialized computer-aided audit tools" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR%5B%5BWikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2FComparison+of+specialized+computer-aided+audit+tools%5D%5DAFD

It has been suggested that this article be merged into Computer-aided audit tools. (Discuss) Proposed since July 2012.
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (July 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This is a comparison of specialized computer-aided audit tools (CAATs) dedicated specialized data analytic software specifically for auditors.

Comparison by specification

Product Name / Brand Developed by Latest stable version Latest release date OS Software license Open source Comments
Analyzer Arbutus Software 5.5 2013-03-31 Windows Proprietary commercial No
Audit Command Language (ACL) ACL Services Ltd. 9.2 2011-09-18 Windows Proprietary commercial No
ESKORT Computer Audit (SESAM) Intrasoft International Scandinavia A/S 7.7.1 2012-05-01 Windows Proprietary commercial No Requires Excel for showing graphs and result of Benford law analysis.
Interactive Data Extraction and Analysis (IDEA) CaseWare International Inc. 9.1 2013-03-04 Windows Proprietary commercial No
TopCAATs Reinvent Data Ltd 3.0.2 2013-09-06 Windows Proprietary commercial No Requires Microsoft Excel (TopCAATs is an Excel add-in)

Comparison by analysis features

The following table compares features of specialized computer-aided audit tools. The table has several fields, as follows:

  1. Product Name: Product's name; sometime includes edition if a certain edition is targeted.
  2. Age analysis: Specifies whether the product supports making age analysis (stratification by date).
  3. Benford's law: Specifies whether the product supports finding abnormal distribution of specific digits accordingly to Benford's law.
  4. Calculated field: Specifies whether the product supports adding extra calculated fields into the table/file. Usually implies using an expression builder feature to build up expressions for defining the field calculation.
  5. Drill-down (Table): Specifies whether the product supports drill-down features by zooming in (filtering) on selected rows in the table.
  6. Drill-down (Pivot): Specifies whether the product supports drill-down features through pivot table.
  7. Matching: Specifies whether the product supports finding matching items for a specific field in a table/file. For example, this could be used to find duplicate billings of invoices within the sales ledger.
  8. Matching (Fuzzy): Specifies whether the product supports finding matching items for a specific field using fuzzy comparison. For instance, values compared are similar but not exactly the same (e.g., using Levenshtein matching).
  9. Sample (Random): Specifies whether the product supports selecting a random sample of rows from the table/file (population).
  10. Sample (Monetary unit): Specifies whether the product supports selecting a monetary unit sample of rows from the table/field (population). This is also known as dollar-unit sampling (when values are in U.S. currency).
  11. Sequence check (Gap): Specifies whether the product supports can find (identify) gabs (in sequences) for a specific field. For example, finding a broken sequence in an invoice number sequence.
  12. Sort field: Specifies whether the product supports sorting (indexing) by a specific field (column). Sorting helps identifying blank/empty values or excessive (out-of-band) values.
  13. Sort multiple fields: Specifies whether the product supports sorting by multiple fields (columns).
  14. Statistics: Specifies whether the product supports calculation and presentation of various statistics on a specific field (e.g., for a numeric fields values such as total number of positive numbers, total number negative numbers, average value (balance), etc.)
  15. Stratification: Specifies whether the product supports stratification on number (amount) values in specified intervals. Splits the population into strata (intervals) and aggregates (summarizes) values. Can be used to find largest, smallest and average amount transactions (rows).
  16. Total row: Specifies whether the products supports displaying a total row for the table/file, e.g. accumulated numerical value.
Product Name Age Analysis Benfords Law Calculated field Drill-down (Table) Drill-down (Pivot) Matching Matching (Fuzzy) Sample (Random) Sample (Monetary unit) Sequence Check (Gap) Sort field Sort multiple fields Statistics Stratification Total row
Analyzer - Arbutus Software Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Audit Command Language (ACL) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
ESKORT Computer Audit (SESAM) No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Interactive Data Extraction and Analysis (IDEA) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
TopCAATs Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Comparison by other features

  1. Audit log: Specifies whether the product logs activity performed by the user (the auditor) for later reference (e.g., inclusion into audit report).
  2. Data graph: Specifies whether the product provides graphs of results.
  3. Export (CSV): Specifies whether the product support exporting selected rows to a comma-separated values formatted file. Usually also implies capability to the clipboard (in CSV format) for pasting into applications supporting pasting from CSV files such as Excel.
  4. Export (DBF): Specifies whether the product support exporting (saving) selected rows to a dBase Table file.
  5. Export (Excel): Specifies whether the product support exporting (saving) selected rows to an Excel file. Usually also implies capability to copy the rows to the clipboard (in some format) for pasting into Excel.
Product Name Audit log Data graph Export (CSV) Export (DBF) Export (Excel)
Analyzer - Arbutus Software Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Audit Command Language (ACL) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
ESKORT Computer Audit (SESAM) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Interactive Data Extraction and Analysis (IDEA) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
TopCAATs Yes Yes Yes No Yes

Comparison by data preparation features

  1. Append/Merge: Specifies whether the product can combine two tables/files with identical fields into a single table/file. For example it could be doing a merge of two years of accounts payable tables/files into a single table/file.
  2. Import wizard: Specifies whether the product provides an import wizard to assist in importing (interpretation, conversion, formatting) data for analysis.
  3. Import (CSV): Specifies whether the product supports import data from a comma-separated values formatted file.
  4. Import (DBF): Specifies whether the product supports import data from dBase DBF files.
  5. Import (Excel): Specifies whether the product supports import data from Microsoft Excel workbook file. Note that different Excel format versions may apply.
  6. Import (SAF-T): Specifies whether the product supports import data from an OECD SAF-T file. As SAF-T is based on XML a more general XML import may cover the feature although direct SAF-T import improves the user experience. Note that different SAF-T format versions may apply.
  7. Import (SIE): Specifies whether the product supports import data from a SIE format file.
  8. Import (XBRL-GL): Specifies whether the product supports import data from a XBRL GL file. As XBRL-GL is based on XML a more general XML import may cover the feature although direct XBRL-GL import improves the user experience. Note that different XBRL-GL format versions may apply.
Product Name Append/Merge Import wizard Import (CSV) Import (DBF) Import (Excel) Import (SAF-T) Import (SIE) Import (XBRL-GL)
Analyzer - Arbutus Software Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Audit Command Language (ACL) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ? ? Yes
ESKORT Computer Audit (SESAM) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No
Interactive Data Extraction and Analysis (IDEA) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
TopCAATs Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ? Yes

Notes

  1. ^ "IDEA Version 9.1". Retrieved 9 May 2013.

References

Categories: