Revision as of 08:58, 29 January 2014 editAnsh666 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,382 edits Undid revision 592932619 by Ansh666 (talk) oops← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:12, 29 January 2014 edit undoWilliamJE (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers132,561 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
<!--Template:Afd top | |||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
The result was '''speedy keep'''. No policy-based reason for deletion. Possible bad faith nomination considering that the nominator also blanked the article without explanation also. (])] 17:12, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
I do not see any reason why Wirtland article in English Misplaced Pages must be deleted. This article has been running for 5.5 years without problems. Also, it has "sister articles" in 9 other language Wiki's - in Български, Español, Esperanto, فارسی (Farsi), Français, Interlingua, Русский (Russian), Türkçe, Українська (Ukrainian). I strongly oppose deletion. | I do not see any reason why Wirtland article in English Misplaced Pages must be deleted. This article has been running for 5.5 years without problems. Also, it has "sister articles" in 9 other language Wiki's - in Български, Español, Esperanto, فارسی (Farsi), Français, Interlingua, Русский (Russian), Türkçe, Українська (Ukrainian). I strongly oppose deletion. | ||
*'''Keep'''; pursuant to points made in ] ] debates, this appears to meet ] due to a plethora of secondary sources. ] (]) 08:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''; pursuant to points made in ] ] debates, this appears to meet ] due to a plethora of secondary sources. ] (]) 08:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Revision as of 17:12, 29 January 2014
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. No policy-based reason for deletion. Possible bad faith nomination considering that the nominator also blanked the article without explanation also. (non-admin closure)...William 17:12, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
I do not see any reason why Wirtland article in English Misplaced Pages must be deleted. This article has been running for 5.5 years without problems. Also, it has "sister articles" in 9 other language Wiki's - in Български, Español, Esperanto, فارسی (Farsi), Français, Interlingua, Русский (Russian), Türkçe, Українська (Ukrainian). I strongly oppose deletion.
- Keep; pursuant to points made in similar AfD debates, this appears to meet WP:CORP due to a plethora of secondary sources. Arielkoiman (talk) 08:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.