Misplaced Pages

Zero-state solution: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:12, 10 September 2013 view sourceSporkBot (talk | contribs)Bots1,245,159 editsm Repair redirect← Previous edit Revision as of 22:03, 30 January 2014 view source IRISZOOM (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,892 edits Rewording and attributing it correctly. Adding links. However, there is a already similiar article.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Israel-Palestinian peace process}} {{Israel-Palestinian peace process}}
In the context of the ], a '''zero-state solution''' assumes there is no unique Palestinian identity, and that those now considering themselves ] actually should revert to their pre-1948 nationality, essential ]ian or ]ian. Israel thus has no reason to agree to assimilate them or provide them with a state, since they were part of those countries until their territory was captured in the ]. In the context of the ], a '''zero-state solution''', based on a proposal by the ] (ACPR), assumes that there is no unique Palestinian identity and that the ] in the ] should get "restoration of ]ian ]" while Egypt should have responsibility for the ]. ] thus has no reason to agree to assimilate them or provide them with a state, since they were part of those countries until their territory was captured in the 1967 ].


The approach generally assumes that Israel will expand to fill the territories captured in 1967. Specific proposals differ as whether the present Palestinians can remain where they are, as non-citizens of Israel, or are expected to return to the territory of their national identity. The approach generally assumes that Israel will expand to fill the ] in 1967. Specific proposals differ as whether the present Palestinians can remain where they are, as non-citizens of Israel, or are expected to return to the territory of their national identity.


One proposal comes from the ], the "Framework Proposal for a National Strategy Regarding Judea and Samaria and the Issue of Eretz Israel Arabs." This describes an objective of "Consolidating a political proposal with the intention of halting Israel's defeatist campaign that is manifest in its most extreme form in the conduct of the Olmert Government." It rejects the idea of a Palestinian identity, returning Arabs in the occupied territories to Jordanian and Egyptian citizenship.<ref>{{citation The proposal by ACPR, the "Framework Proposal for a National Strategy Regarding Judea and Samaria and the Issue of Eretz Israel Arabs", describes an objective of "Consolidating a political proposal with the intention of halting Israel's defeatist campaign that is manifest in its most extreme form in the conduct of the Olmert Government". It assumes that there is no unique Palestinian identity and that the Palestinians in the West Bank should get "restoration of Jordanian citizenship" while Egypt should have responsibility for the Gaza Strip. It proposes a unilateral solution that it does not believe ] will accept:

| date = 8 November 2008
⚫ * Extending Israeli sovereignty over ]
⚫ | title = Framework Proposal for a National Strategy Regarding Judea and Samaria and the Issue of Eretz Israel Arabs
⚫ * "] is ]" and restoration of Jordanian citizenship to the Arabs in Judea and Samaria
| url = http://www.acpr.org.il/madorim/0811-yoman-maarechetE.pdf}}</ref> It proposes a unilateral solution that it does not believe Arab states will accept:
⚫ * Municipal autonomy for the Arabs of Judea and Samaria (on the basis of the Camp David Accords) accompanied by a total disarmament of the autonomous areas
⚫ *Extending Israeli sovereignty over ].
⚫ * The areas of Arab settlements located on private property (the Mosaic Program by Dr. Yuval Arnon Ohanna)
⚫ *"] is Palestine" and restoration of Jordanian citizenship to the Arabs in Judea and Samaria.
⚫ * Military liquidation of the military infrastructure in Gaza and according responsibility for the area to Egypt
⚫ *Municipal autonomy for the Arabs of Judea and Samaria (on the basis of the Camp David Accords) accompanied by a total disarmament of the autonomous areas.
⚫ * ]: Equal rights in exchange for equal obligations
⚫ *The areas of Arab settlements located on private property (the Mosaic Program by Dr. Yuval Arnon Ohanna).
⚫ *Military liquidation of the military infrastructure in Gaza and according responsibility for the area to Egypt.
⚫ *Israeli Arabs: Equal rights in exchange for equal obligations.


==References== ==References==
{{Citizendium}} {{Citizendium}}
⚫ *
{{reflist}}


] ]

Revision as of 22:03, 30 January 2014

Part of a series on
the Israeli–Palestinian conflict
Israeli–Palestinian
peace process
History
Camp David Accords1978
Madrid Conference1991
Oslo Accords1993 / 95
Hebron Protocol1997
Wye River Memorandum1998
Sharm El Sheikh Memorandum1999
Camp David Summit2000
The Clinton Parameters2000
Taba Summit2001
Road Map2003
Agreement on Movement and Access2005
Annapolis Conference2007
Mitchell-led talks2010–11
Kerry-led talks2013–14
Primary concerns
Secondary concerns
International brokers
Proposals
Projects / groups / NGOs

In the context of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, a zero-state solution, based on a proposal by the Ariel Center for Policy Research (ACPR), assumes that there is no unique Palestinian identity and that the Palestinians in the West Bank should get "restoration of Jordanian citizenship" while Egypt should have responsibility for the Gaza Strip. Israel thus has no reason to agree to assimilate them or provide them with a state, since they were part of those countries until their territory was captured in the 1967 Six-Day War.

The approach generally assumes that Israel will expand to fill the territories occupied in 1967. Specific proposals differ as whether the present Palestinians can remain where they are, as non-citizens of Israel, or are expected to return to the territory of their national identity.

The proposal by ACPR, the "Framework Proposal for a National Strategy Regarding Judea and Samaria and the Issue of Eretz Israel Arabs", describes an objective of "Consolidating a political proposal with the intention of halting Israel's defeatist campaign that is manifest in its most extreme form in the conduct of the Olmert Government". It assumes that there is no unique Palestinian identity and that the Palestinians in the West Bank should get "restoration of Jordanian citizenship" while Egypt should have responsibility for the Gaza Strip. It proposes a unilateral solution that it does not believe Arab states will accept:

  • Extending Israeli sovereignty over Judea and Samaria
  • "Jordan is Palestine" and restoration of Jordanian citizenship to the Arabs in Judea and Samaria
  • Municipal autonomy for the Arabs of Judea and Samaria (on the basis of the Camp David Accords) accompanied by a total disarmament of the autonomous areas
  • The areas of Arab settlements located on private property (the Mosaic Program by Dr. Yuval Arnon Ohanna)
  • Military liquidation of the military infrastructure in Gaza and according responsibility for the area to Egypt
  • Israeli Arabs: Equal rights in exchange for equal obligations

References

This article incorporates material from the Citizendium article "Zero-state solution", which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License but not under the GFDL.

Categories: