| Revision as of 21:09, 18 June 2006 editNat Krause (talk | contribs)15,397 edits Reversions of Buddhism← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:10, 18 June 2006 edit undoNat Krause (talk | contribs)15,397 editsm fmtNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| == Reversions of ] == | == Reversions of ] == | ||
| ==Three reverts== | |||
| I noticed that you have again reverted an article, in this case ], three times during one day (although just barely). Please refrain from doing this in the future. If you continue to do so, you might be blocked under the ].—]<sup>(])</sup> 21:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | I noticed that you have again reverted an article, in this case ], three times during one day (although just barely). Please refrain from doing this in the future. If you continue to do so, you might be blocked under the ].—]<sup>(])</sup> 21:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:10, 18 June 2006
Hi there. I appreciate your contribution to Atman (Buddhism), but I would suggest that you use the discussion page there before placing what is a rather Pali-biased section of text in the introduction. The contribution you make is valued - but I am unsure about what your specific message is, and moreover, I am unsure that it represents all Buddhists. It's good to see a new wp editor (20040302 10:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC))
Discuss
I believe you have many contributions to make. You really should discuss your editorial at Talk:Atman (Buddhism) - your recent edits are already present in the main article - but I am becoming increasingly unsure about your willingness to cooperate, which is a necessary requirement for Misplaced Pages. (20040302 18:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC))
Repeated reversions
I noticed that you have reverted the page Ananda Coomaraswamy four times today. Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.—Nat Krause 04:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Reversions of Buddhism
I noticed that you have again reverted an article, in this case Buddhism, three times during one day (although just barely). Please refrain from doing this in the future. If you continue to do so, you might be blocked under the three revert rule.—Nat Krause 21:09, 18 June 2006 (UTC)