| Revision as of 22:31, 10 January 2014 editCapricornmanager1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users796 edits →reverting with no reason← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:51, 2 February 2014 edit undoFyunck(click) (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers63,564 edits →Refrain from reverting: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| {{talkback|Wolbo|)}} | {{talkback|Wolbo|)}} | ||
| --] (]) 18:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | --] (]) 18:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Refrain from reverting == | |||
| {{uw-3rr}} ] (]) 19:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:51, 2 February 2014
Welcome
Hello, Capricornmanager1, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. The New Mikemoral Happy editing! Mikemoral♪♫ 20:18, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Tennis_statistics#Proposal
A proposal has been put forward to replace Tennis statistics with User:Fyunck(click)/SandboxTennisStats and name it List of non-Grand Slam tennis statistics and records. Thoughts, comments and/or votes are encouraged. SilkTork * 08:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
reverting with no reason
Why would you keep reverting two charts in ATP World Tour records where the rest of the charts have a top 10? A top 10 is pretty normal for charts and I see no explanation in your edit summaries as to why you reverted. It is important that you add summaries whenever you revert (or actually whenever you edit). Please leave it at 10. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:24, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- since you edited once and I see no response I'm changing it back. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Why have you reverted these 2 charts from top 15 to 10 in the first place? Very few players have had the number 1 ranking, therefore it is very relevant to include these. Please leave it at top 15. Thank you. (Capricornmanager1 (talk) 09:04, 5 April 2011 (UTC))
- Thanks for answering. Because all the other charts are top ten and people start expanding them to top 12, top 13, top 15. Why have one chart in the article at top 15? It looks out of place. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:35, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Not all the other charts are top 10! However, it is correct that all charts now are "cut" down to max top 10. I for one do not agree with that as a general good rule but ok.. (11:21, 5 April 2011 (UTC))
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Wolbo (talk) 18:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Refrain from reverting
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)