Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:01, 2 February 2014

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

Muslim/Zionist category tag warring reported by User:Psychonaut (Result: No action)

Users involved:

• 139.164.160.141 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)
• 85.166.53.217 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)
• 94.203.97.130 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)

The above users are engaged in edit warring related to articles on persecution of or terrorism by Muslims or Zionists. The activity involves repeated addition or removal of category tags from a large number of articles. Some users are leaving highly charged or disparaging comments towards the others in edit summaries. Please refer to contributions.

The matter was previous brought up at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive826#Do we give IPs discretionary sanction warnings? though no action was taken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psychonaut (talk • contribs) 14:52, 23 January, 2014 (UTC)

• Result: No action. The second and third IPs appear to have stopped editing. I don't see any recent problems with the #1 IP. Report again if you see any abuse. This case was also discussed on Psychonaut's user talk. EdJohnston (talk) 04:21, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Nfomamdoalfrlpsa reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: 1 month)

Page

Arms Industry (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Nfomamdoalfrlpsa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 07:43, 31 January 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593245969 by Jim1138 (talk) stop Rv We've had this discussion"
2. 07:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 592162772 by Bevo74 (talk) We've had this discussion"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Started again after he got a 72 hour block for exactly the same reason. Please see comment by Kuru a week ago: . Δρ.Κ.  07:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

We've had this discussion"

the source doesn't provide evidence to substantiate its claims and is also riddled with inaccuracies and contradictions. If you would like to release source or evidence to substantiate its claims please do--Nfomamdoalfrlpsa (talk) 07:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 1 month for the resumption of edit warring. The next time should be indefinite. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:23, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

User:Kishok Nazriya reported by User:Kailash29792 (Result: Warned)

Page

Nazriya Nazim (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Kishok Nazriya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. Consecutive edits made from 07:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC) to 07:51, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
   1. 07:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC) ""
   2. 07:51, 31 January 2014 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Continuously tries to showcase illicit images of Nazriya Nazim, removing the legally used ones. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

I got tipped off by the word "illicit", but maybe "poorly sourced" and "properly licensed" would be better terms here? ViperSnake151  Talk  22:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

• Warned. Not really an edit war issue but a copyright issue, as well as probable communication problems and promotional issues. I've warned the user on their talk page about the copyright violations.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:54, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

User:The sun2013 reported by User:ViperSnake151 (Result: Warned)

Page

Vevo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

The sun2013 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 20:48, 31 January 2014 (UTC) "Vandalism page vevo 💕 in English, This page needs to be protected from the clowns that erases information or enter false data to generate controversy among the fans of the artists."
2. 20:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC) "Vandalism page vevo 💕 in English"
3. 19:01, 31 January 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593317551 by ViperSnake151 (talk) WTF WHO THE PEOPLE?"
4. 18:16, 31 January 2014 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 22:18, 31 January 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Vevo. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 18:58, 31 January 2014 (UTC) "/* Do not restore the "Certified" list. */ new section"

Comments:

Constantly restores content that was removed as a violation of WP:INDISCRIMINATE; editing pattern and conduct seems to imply "ownership" behaviour ViperSnake151  Talk  22:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

• Result: User:The sun 2013 is warned not to again restore the 'certified list'] that was complained about on the talk page unless he obtains consensus first. Another admin has imposed semiprotection for a year and we'll see if that helps with the turbulence on this article. EdJohnston (talk) 17:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz and user:5.69.238.72 reported by User:Andy Dingley (Result: IP blocked)

Page: Morph (franchise) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

5.69.238.72 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Brightline 3+RR on both sides. Not a major change, just trolling from the IP. I reverted once to a previous stable version, then was reverted in minutes by Hullaballoo Wolfowitz who now alleges that I'm a sock of the IP! Andy Dingley (talk) 01:24, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked IP for 48 hours. Andy Dingley, please complete these reports properly. Hullaballoo reverted the IP's edit, not yours.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:52, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
  • FWIW, there was an edit conflict involved; Andy and I both intended to revert the IP, I was just slower. My sock reference was meant to refer to the IP, who I suspect I'd spotted some time ago repeatedly vandalizing the Kerry Katona article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:13, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
    • That's what I figured. I'm surprised Andy didn't see it. Maybe he was too busy reporting you. :-) --Bbb23 (talk) 04:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Jakandsig reported by User:TheTimesAreAChanging (Result: Blocked)

Page: Dreamcast (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Jakandsig (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: ,

Comments:
Jackandsiq, who has been previously blocked for and aroused community ire by edit warring, reverted four times in less than an hour. In addition to the material he actually disagreed with, he started removing thousands of bytes worth of content that I added to make a WP:POINT, but he was reverting to a virtually identical version each time. I reverted him twice; three other editors reverted him once each.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 03:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

 Checking... Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:01, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked Jakandsig for 5 days and TheTimesAreAChanging Warned. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:26, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

User:50.30.49.20 reported by User:EvergreenFir (Result: Blocked)

Page

P. J. Patterson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

50.30.49.20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 05:20, 30 January 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593018561 by Sven Manguard (talk) Source was given(SIPT). They are currently prosecuting Misick (ex-Premier (chief minister of the Turks and Caicos Islands))."
2. 16:24, 30 January 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593018561 by Sven Manguard (talk) The source is verified. Who wrote that it was a crime?"
3. 16:47, 30 January 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593137059 by EricSerge (talk) The Official source. Multiple governments has put this team is place."
4. 18:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593152871 by EvergreenFir (talk) Who wrote that a crime was committed. There is a confiscation Order(conviction)."
5. 22:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593323261 by EvergreenFir (talk) Court Order"
6. 03:11, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593349543 by EvergreenFir (talk) Queen Bestowed an Award"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 22:38, 31 January 2014 (UTC) "General note: Unconstructive editing on P. J. Patterson. (TW)"
2. 22:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC) "/* Edit warring warning */ new section"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 22:41, 31 January 2014 (UTC) "/* Recent edits about court order */ new section"

Comments:

User just got off ban for edit warring today and proceeded to edit war on the same article. WP:NOTHERE EvergreenFir (talk) 04:46, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of one week.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:52, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

User:1houstonian reported by User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (Result: Blocked for 24 hours)

Page

Steve Stockman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

1houstonian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 03:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Current tenure (District 36) */ revert with citations please do not vandalise"
2. 04:00, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593385121 by GabrielF (talk)"
3. 04:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593387454 by Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk)"
4. 05:13, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Current tenure (District 36) */ please do not remove sourced material showing the persons positions"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 04:55, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Please stop reverting and talk */ sure"
2. 05:10, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "/* writing on a talk page */ new section"
3. 05:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Steve Stockman. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 04:44, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Hearsay? */ new section"
2. 05:20, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Public Figure */ r"

Comments:

The editor won't engage constructively on talk page and has at least four reverts in the last couple hours despite both invitations to discuss and warnings. — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 05:28, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

User:TheDude36 reported by User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (Result: 24 hours)

Page

Rick Joyner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

TheDude36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 16:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593446788 by Geraldo Perez (talk)"
2. 16:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593448197 by Sean.hoyland (talk) VANDALISM VANDALISM"
3. 16:50, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593449443 by Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) I CREATED THIS PAGE! YOU ARE POSTING FALSE INFORMATION!"
4. 16:56, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593449873 by Geraldo Perez (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 16:50, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Removal of content, blanking on Rick Joyner. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

See talk page for additional warnings. See edit summaries for assertions of ownership. The editor won't stop reverting and discuss anything on the talk page. — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:59, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Mark Arsten (talk) 17:08, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Caprimanali reported by User:Dougweller (Result: Blocked)

Page

Lurs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Caprimanali (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 18:48, 1 February 2014 (UTC) ""
2. 17:27, 1 February 2014 (UTC) ""
3. 17:07, 1 February 2014 (UTC) ""
4. 16:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 17:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "General note: Not adhering to neutral point of view on Lurs. (TW)"
2. 17:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "/* February 2014 */ don't change quotations, use edit summaries"
3. 17:07, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "Caution: Not adhering to neutral point of view on Hamadan Province. (TW)"
4. 18:11, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Lurs. (TW)"
5. 18:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "Warning: Adding unreferenced controversial information about living persons on Tofy Mussivand. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

POV edits across a range of articles. Probably a BLP violation at Tofy Mussivand as no sources say the subject is Kurdish. Basically nationalist editing - as you can see I warned him for changing a quotation (to add Kurdish to it). Removed sourced text which didn't support a Kurdish pov. Dougweller (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Info:

The user has done the same type of edits on svwiki and is now blocked there. -- Tegel (talk) 21:14, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 72 hours.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:06, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Dicklyon reported by User:Jmh649 (Result: Voluntary break)

Page: Vitamin D (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Dicklyon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:
User in question is reverting multiple different editors. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Characterizing these as reverts and blaming me for edit warring is a rather biased picture (the first revert was by Doc James, Jmh649 after I tried to implement the result of a talk-page discussion; he not only removed my attempt but restored a version that everyone had agreed was wrong). But I will refrain from touching it more as I said on the talk page. Dicklyon (talk) 19:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

• Here are the recent Dicklyon edits after removing consecutive edits by the same person, using the 3RR helper tool:

1. 17:14, 30 January 2014 (edit summary: "/* Cardiovascular disease */ OK to mention and reference both sides in a topic with competing POVs")
2. 17:59, 30 January 2014 (edit summary: "don't censor alternative points of view")
3. 20:34, 30 January 2014 (edit summary: "Reverted 1 edit by Jmh649 (talk): Restore ref to recent (2008, 2010) results. (TW)")
4. 04:38, 1 February 2014 (edit summary: "/* Cancer */ clarify what small effects were reported")
5. 04:43, 1 February 2014 (edit summary: "/* Bone health */ clarify what they were looking at here")
6. 04:59, 1 February 2014 (edit summary: "/* Bone health */ why do people misrepresent sources so badly? fixing")
7. 05:03, 1 February 2014 (edit summary: "/* Bone health */")
8. 05:08, 1 February 2014 (edit summary: "/* Effects */ update again per sources and ongoing talk-page discussion that reverter seems unaware of")
9. 05:45, 1 February 2014 (edit summary: "/* Cardiovascular disease */ say something more about ongoing studies; it's relevant that the report support and reports them")
10. 16:05, 1 February 2014 (edit summary: "/* Effects */ re-fix the fortmann quote to what applies here; don't suppress the information from the quoted sources")
11. 17:26, 1 February 2014 (edit summary: "/* Cardiovascular disease */ a 2014 report should not censor others from the last few years, per WP:MEDRS")
12. 17:33, 1 February 2014 (edit summary: "Reverted 1 edit by Alexbrn: Alex, please restrain your censorship reflex and try to work this out on the talk page; I did not pick these refs have been in the article long before I looked at it. (TW)")

User:Dicklyon made nine reverts on February 1 alone. Though Dicklyon is not the only person reverting here, he beats the others by a wide margin. Everyone is well-intentioned, but it would be best if Dicklyon would agree to take a 7-day break from the article to avoid a block. EdJohnston (talk) 22:57, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Most of these edits are good-faith attempts to improve the article in the direction that we had been discussing on the talk page. How can you characterize an edit such as this one that nobody objects to as a revert? I'm already taking a break from the article, as I said. I can make it seven days if you like, but I'd rather have you look into what's going on and say something appropriate the other three guys with the censoring reflex defending the status quo and making progress difficult. See the talk page discussion (not just the section that the doc linked, but several before and after). Dicklyon (talk) 23:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

• Result: Dicklyon will take a voluntary break from editing the article. All of you know about WP:Dispute resolution and RfCs. If these issues are important enough to edit war about, they are probably worth discussing formally. EdJohnston (talk) 23:40, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Geraldo Perez reported for editwarring at Rick Joyner by User:Grade X (Result: Locked)

1st 2nd 3rd 4th

Enjoy.

Grade X (talk) 19:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

• Please see ANI discussion about Grade X here: Misplaced Pages:Ani#Grade_X before taking action on this.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 19:31, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

• I reverted per WP:Edit warring#3RR exemptions #7 as WP:BLP violations discussed at WP:BLPN and on talk page and determined there to be as such. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
• Page protected. Article fully protected for three days by Mark Arsten.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:19, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Jackmcbarn reported by User:88.104.24.150 (Result: No violation)

Page: User:Jackmcbarn/PCRFC implicit oppose (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Jackmcbarn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

For one, 3RR doesn't apply in your own userspace. Also, I made it clear that that was the wrong page to edit. Thirdly, the warning link was ME warning YOU. Finally, you started undoing my regen of the page, which is clearly blatantly unconstructive. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Oh, AND the first two reverts were by Technical 13, not me! Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:24, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

• No violation WP:3RR indeed doesn't apply to a user's own userspace, and it also doesn't apply to reverting clearly disruptive edits, such as 88.104.24.150's removal of a name that belongs on that page per its inclusion criteria. Huon (talk) 02:41, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Huon,

Can you please educate me, and show me that specific policy?

And please note that the diff you showed was just me undoing this where Jackmcbarn undid the edit from Aircorn - not me. Thanks. 88.104.24.150 (talk) 04:07, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Aircorn never edited that page. I added his name to the list in . You undid my edit for no reason in . Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Read 3RR exemptions, it clearly states it. AcidSnow (talk) 04:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

AcidSnow already pointed out where the exceptions to WP:3RR can be found, and Jackmcbarn pointed out that he didn't revert thrice anyway. Regarding Aircorn, he supported proposal 1, which by the rules laid out at the top of Misplaced Pages talk:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2014#Implicit oppose counts as an implicit oppose to proposal 4. Jackmcbarn added them to that column of his list; 88.104.24.150 removed them with an edit summary that rather clearly shows that 88.104 didn't understand what they were doing, and reverted a second time for good measure. Both the original report and 88.104's reply here contain so many falsehoods that it's almost comical. 88.104.24.150, you may want to read WP:BOOMERANG. Huon (talk) 13:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

User:88.104.24.150 reported by User:Technical 13 (Result: Semi-protected)

Page

User:Jackmcbarn/PCRFC implicit oppose (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

88.104.24.150 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 22:48, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Implicit opposes */ r"
2. 00:57, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593502212 by Technical 13 (talk) per and lack-of-response theirin"
3. 02:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593521016 by Jackmcbarn (talk) IP hate, meh"
4. 02:12, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "oops"
5. 02:14, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593522253 by Jackmcbarn (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 23:20, 1 February 2014 (UTC) "General note: Editing tests on User:Jackmcbarn/PCRFC implicit oppose. (TW)"
2. 01:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "Final warning: Vandalism on User:Jackmcbarn/PCRFC_implicit_oppose. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 00:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC) on Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring "Archiving 4 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive234) (bot"

Comments:

My first revert of this user's post was a full WP:AGF assuming it was just a misplaced or test edit. The IP, told me it was not a test and reverted my undo of their edit. This quickly escalated into a full out edit war between this IP and another user which resulted in protection of the page being edited. Reviewing the contributions of the IP will show that it is obviously and vandalism only account and should be dealt with as such. Thank you. / Technical 13 (talk) 05:15, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

"it is obviously and vandalism only account and should be dealt with as such"

Obviously.

Even though I've 'vandalised' nothing.

Meh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.24.150 (talk) 05:26, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

• Page protected (semi'd indefinitely as a user request in own userspace). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Ersroitasent reported by User:Faizan (Result: Blocked)

Page

Yom Kippur War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Ersroitasent (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 12:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593570058 by Faizan (talk) it was not supported by consensus Do not edit war, take it to talk page"
2. 11:38, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "Undid revision 593542650 by Brewcrewer (talk) no consensus"
3. 00:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "undo trivial edit by Mikrobølgeovn"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 08:38, 31 January 2014 (UTC) "General note: Unconstructive editing on Yom Kippur War. (TW)"
2. 11:57, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Yom Kippur War. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Clear violation of 1RR rule within 24 hours. Spotted this violation earlier too, warned the user several times, but still another case of edit-warring. The diffs have been provided, the user is edit-warring with several experienced editors, as evident from the article's history. He did three reverts in 24 hours. Faizan 12:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Clearly not supported by consensus

We've had this discussion it was not supported by consensus--Ersroitasent (talk) 12:06, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

And that's an exception to edit-warring? In addition, 3 separate people seem to be "against" your edit - that looks like better consensus that you think DP 12:24, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

• Ersroitasent Blocked – for a period of 1 day. Faizan take care, you were only 3 hours outside 24 hours yourself. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:31, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Sure Callanecc, thanks. Faizan 12:53, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, Faizan, being 3 hrs outside of 24 is usually considered gaming the system, and should also have led to a block DP 13:33, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Oda Mari reported by User:STSC (Result: Declined)

Page: Air Defense Identification Zone (East China Sea) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Oda Mari (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: 04:57, 1 February 2014

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 08:56, 1 February 2014 (edit summary: "Reverted to revision 592667818 by Mogism: The description of the source is unreliable. Besides, there's no mention on Japan in the source. Please provide RS with evidence like the source #37. . (TW)")
2. 06:32, 2 February 2014 (edit summary: "Reverted 3 edits by 54.199.150.33 (talk): Though it's cited, there are no evidence in them. (TW)")
3. 08:44, 2 February 2014 (edit summary: "Reverted 1 edit by 54.199.161.4 (talk): The evidence is the photograph of the forein aircrafts and their identification. See talk page. (TW)")

Comments:
These are unjustifiable disruptive reverting purely for personal nationalistic reasons.

• Declined. STSC, don't make accusations without evidence. I don't even understand your involvement (or uninvolvement) in the dispute. The IP addresses, btw, all come from an Amazon corporate account. There's been no WP:3RR violation and the reported editor has opened a discussion on the talk page.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:10, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Capricornmanager1 reported by User:Fyunck(click) (Result: )

Page

World number 1 male tennis player rankings (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Capricornmanager1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. Consecutive edits made from 11:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC) to 12:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
   1. 11:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* 1913–present */"
   2. 11:59, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Number of times players ranked number 1 */"
   3. 12:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Leading number 1 ranked players by decade */"
2. Consecutive edits made from 18:16, 2 February 2014 (UTC) to 18:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
   1. 18:16, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* 1913–present */"
   2. 18:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Leading number 1 ranked players by decade */"
   3. 18:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Leading number 1 ranked players by decade */"
   4. 18:18, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Number of times players ranked number 1 */"
3. Consecutive edits made from 19:10, 2 February 2014 (UTC) to 19:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
   1. 19:10, 2 February 2014 (UTC) ""
   2. 19:15, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Number of times players ranked number 1 */"
   3. 19:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Number of times players ranked number 1 */"
   4. 19:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Number of times players ranked number 1 */"
4. Consecutive edits made from 19:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC) to 19:31, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
   1. 19:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Number of times players ranked number 1 */"
   2. 19:31, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* 1913–present */"
5. Consecutive edits made from 19:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC) to 19:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
   1. 19:47, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Number of times players ranked number 1 */"
   2. 19:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Leading number 1 ranked players by decade */"
   3. 19:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* 1913–present */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 19:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC) "/* Refrain from reverting */ new section"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

This is not the first time this editor has been told not to keep reverting by multiple editors, though it is mostly in the subject lines. His 3RR is going on. Not sure why he won't listen. Warning given and yet he did it again. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:59, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring