| Revision as of 20:19, 2 February 2014 editAnil Singh Pokhriyal (talk | contribs)34 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:23, 2 February 2014 edit undoNeilN (talk | contribs)134,455 edits pointerNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| Thanks] (]) 20:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC) | Thanks] (]) 20:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :You have that exactly backwards. Per ]: "Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." --] <sup>'']''</sup> 20:23, 2 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:23, 2 February 2014
Anyone who is trying to remove my reference on Ayurveda. Please read this
Answer These Questions:
1.) Do you have knowledge of Ayurveda?
2.) Can you read Hindi?
3.) Do you know anyone in India, who can verify if the author is noticable or not?
If none of them is yes, then how can you verify that he is a notable person or not. Before marking as spam research thoroughly on Rajiv Dixit and Ramdev. You can contact someone in India to see the significance of him.
Don't remove something unless you can't prove its not significant.
ThanksAnil Singh Pokhriyal (talk) 20:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
- You have that exactly backwards. Per Misplaced Pages:Verifiability: "Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it." --NeilN 20:23, 2 February 2014 (UTC)