| Revision as of 19:46, 3 February 2014 editAnupmehra (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,094 edits General note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Karl Marx. (TW) | Revision as of 20:09, 3 February 2014 edit undoRolandR (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers32,329 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Karl Marx. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == February 2014 == | == February 2014 == | ||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the ] tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ]] <sup>]</sup> 19:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC) | ] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the ] tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ]] <sup>]</sup> 19:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="font-family: Papyrus">] (])</span> 20:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
Revision as of 20:09, 3 February 2014
February 2014
Hello, I'm Anupmehra. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Karl Marx, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AnupMehra 19:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Your recent editing history at Karl Marx shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. RolandR (talk) 20:09, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.