Misplaced Pages

Chalkboard scraping: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →
Revision as of 22:43, 30 November 2013 edit99.229.150.190 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 21:21, 7 February 2014 edit undoAnonimski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,593 editsm Anonimski moved page Sound of fingernails scraping chalkboard to Chalkboard scraping: more generalNext edit →
(No difference)

Revision as of 21:21, 7 February 2014

Scraping a chalkboard with the fingernails produces a sound which most people find extremely irritating. The basis of this innate reaction has been studied in the field of psychoacoustics.

The primate heritage hypothesis

One explanation for the adverse reaction is that the sound is similar to the warning call of a primate. However, a study using Cottontop Tamarins, a New World Monkey, found that they react similarly to both high-pitched sounds similar to fingernails on chalkboard, and to amplitude-matched white noise. In contrast, humans are less averse to the white noise than to scraping.

A 1986 study used a tape-recording of a three-pronged garden tool similar to a fork being "grided" across a chalkboard, which roughly reproduces the sound of fingernails on chalkboard. The recording was then manipulated, removing pitches at the extremities and the median. The results were then played back. It was determined that the median pitches are in fact the primary cause of the adverse reaction, not the highest pitches as previously thought. The authors hypothesized that it was due to predation early in human evolution; the sound bore some resemblances to the alarm call of macaque monkeys, or it may have been similar to the call of some predator. This research won one of the authors, Randolph Blake, an Ig Nobel Prize in 2006. More recent research contradicts this hypothesis.

The physical hypothesis

A 2011 study by musicologists Michael Oehler and Christoph Reuter has led its authors to hypothesize that the unpleasantness of the sound is caused by acoustic resonance due to the shape of the human ear canal which amplifies certain frequencies, especially those in the range of 2000 to 4000 Hz (the median pitches mentioned above), at such a level that the sound would trigger pain in our ears.

See also

References

  1. Roger Highfield (2005-11-14). "Study seeks root of noises that annoy us". Vancouver Sun. p. A6.
  2. Lynn Halpern, Randolph Blake, & James Hillenbrand (1986). "Psychoacoustics of a chilling sound" (PDF). Perception and Psychophysics. Psychonomic Society. pp. 77–80. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. "Fingernails on a Chalkboard Garner Psychologist Ig Nobel Prize". 2006-10-08. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
  4. Trevor J. Cox (2008). "Scraping sounds and disgusting noises". Applied Acoustics. 69 (12): 1195. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2007.11.004.
  5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3655174
  6. http://www.acoustics.org/press/162nd/Oehler_4pPP6.html


Stub icon

This psychology-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: