| Revision as of 15:32, 19 June 2006 editIronDuke (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,087 edits →Merger← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:00, 19 June 2006 edit undoBlindVenetian (talk | contribs)75 edits →MergerNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| I'm not even going to bother to cast a formal vote here. Geo, just FYI, ] is an account that was created to stalk me. I'm going to try to add more info in the coming days, but I just wanted to get the stubs in place before I do. But thanks, Geo, for adding to the article. I'm going to be making some changes, so please let me know your thoughts as I do. <font color="green">]</font> 15:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC) | I'm not even going to bother to cast a formal vote here. Geo, just FYI, ] is an account that was created to stalk me. I'm going to try to add more info in the coming days, but I just wanted to get the stubs in place before I do. But thanks, Geo, for adding to the article. I'm going to be making some changes, so please let me know your thoughts as I do. <font color="green">]</font> 15:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| I am not stalking you. If you can get an admin to declare me a sockpuppet or whatever your favorite recrimination is, you may re-delete the tags you deleted. Until then, calling me name is simply a ]. -- ] 17:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:00, 19 June 2006
Merger
There are now seven articles, one for each of the conspirators -- aside from Mike Hawash, they contain an essentially duplicate paragraph, and at most one unique sentence per individual. I would suggest that a merger into this article, with redirects, would be a better solution. -- BlindVenetian 12:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- No Merge - I think that a merger would be short-sighted. The articles might have been largely duplicates, differing in only one or two sentences, at the time the merger was suggested. But this is not because there is no room for the articles to grow more distinct. I added several details to the Patrice Lumumba Ford article. I am sure that similar details could be added for the other individuals. -- Geo Swan 14:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm not even going to bother to cast a formal vote here. Geo, just FYI, BlindVenetian is an account that was created to stalk me. I'm going to try to add more info in the coming days, but I just wanted to get the stubs in place before I do. But thanks, Geo, for adding to the article. I'm going to be making some changes, so please let me know your thoughts as I do. IronDuke 15:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
I am not stalking you. If you can get an admin to declare me a sockpuppet or whatever your favorite recrimination is, you may re-delete the tags you deleted. Until then, calling me name is simply a personal attack. -- BlindVenetian 17:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)