Misplaced Pages

Fish slaughter: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:12, 13 February 2014 editBrian Tomasik (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,330 edits Potentially more humane methods← Previous edit Revision as of 12:18, 13 February 2014 edit undoBrian Tomasik (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,330 edits Potentially more humane methodsNext edit →
Line 37: Line 37:


===Spiking=== ===Spiking===

Also known as ], this method involves sticking a sharp spike through the brain of the fish. If done properly, it can kill quickly, though if the operator misses the brain, the results may be traumatic. Like percussive stunning, it happens one fish at a time and so is mainly done for large species like tuna and salmon.<ref name=Poli2005 />


===Electrical stunning=== ===Electrical stunning===

Revision as of 12:18, 13 February 2014

Fish slaughter is the process of killing fish, typically after harvesting at sea or from fish farms.

Numbers

fishcount.org.uk


Welfare indicators

Research on fish suffering during slaughter relies on measures to indicate when fish are conscious and experiencing pain. Some indicators used by welfare studies include

  • Behavior
    • Swimming, gill movement, eye movement in response to body reorientation, reaction when turned upside down, etc.
  • Electrical measures
  • Haematic measures
    • Cortisol, plasma glucose, plasma lactate, haematocrit, etc.
  • Tissue measures
    • Indicators of stress in the muscle tissue, like lactic acid, pH, and the catabolites of ATP.
    • These indicators typically also correlate with lower-quality meat.

Inhumane methods

Air asphyxiation

Ice bath

CO2 narcosis

Potentially more humane methods

Percussive stunning

Also known as knocking, percussive stunning involves hitting the fish's brain with a wooden or plastic club, called a priest. One or two blows done well can disrupt the brain sufficiently to render the fish insensible and potentially even kill it directly. However, applying this method properly requires training and effort. For some fish species, there are automated tools, like a pneumatic club for salmon.

The method must be applied one fish at a time and so is typically only used for large fish, like salmon and trout. If the operator is skilled, percussive stunning can be among the most humane methods and can also yield high meat quality. One comparison of slaughter methods found that percussive stunning had the best welfare performance as measured by low haematocrit, low plasma glucose, low lactate, and high muscle energy charge.

Spiking

Also known as ikejime, this method involves sticking a sharp spike through the brain of the fish. If done properly, it can kill quickly, though if the operator misses the brain, the results may be traumatic. Like percussive stunning, it happens one fish at a time and so is mainly done for large species like tuna and salmon.

Electrical stunning

Current research

Regulations

  • UK law?
  • EFSA

Notes

  1. ^ Poli, B.M. (2005). "Fish welfare and quality as affected by pre-slaughter and slaughter management". Aquaculture International. 13: 29–49. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  2. Poli, B.M. (2002). "Biochemical stress indicators changes in sea bass as influenced by the slaughter method". Proceeding of the ‘‘Aquaculture Europe 2002: Sea Farming Today and Tomorrow’’. 32: 429–430. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

Further reading

External links