| Revision as of 04:48, 22 February 2014 edit84.127.80.114 (talk) start of discussion on user talk page← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:02, 22 February 2014 edit undoDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots670,797 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)Next edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| ] has proved unable to keep a neutral point of view and has started an ]. I request this user to restore the notices about the sections that are disputed and to start using the ]. ] (]) 04:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC) | ] has proved unable to keep a neutral point of view and has started an ]. I request this user to restore the notices about the sections that are disputed and to start using the ]. ] (]) 04:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for February 22== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:02, 22 February 2014
 Archives |
IP repeatedly doing revoked edits
 | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
IP 84.127.80.114 on the Debian page is repeatedly doing edits that have been revoked 3+ times. 84.127.80.114 also accuses those (several users) who revoke the edits of vandalism. Could the IP be blocked from editing the Debian page? mthinkcpp (talk) 09:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Also see Talk:Debian. mthinkcpp (talk)
- I have given the editor a talk page warning about edit warring, and about using Misplaced Pages for campaigning. Only under very exceptional circumstances is it appropriate to block a user who has not first received clear explanation as to what is wrong with their editing, and given a chance to take that on board and adjust their editing accordingly. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thank-you mthinkcpp (talk) 09:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- The editor is planning (Talk:Debian, latest post) to reinstate the edits one by one, presumably in the view that this does not violate the warning. Can this be avoided? mthinkcpp (talk) 15:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
mthinkcpp has proved unable to keep a neutral point of view and has started an edit war. I request this user to restore the notices about the sections that are disputed and to start using the Debian talk page. 84.127.80.114 (talk) 04:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited C++, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proprietary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)