| Revision as of 09:37, 23 February 2014 editVanished user 6393699 (talk | contribs)9,262 editsm →Dedh Ishqiya: plan← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:39, 23 February 2014 edit undo86.143.91.10 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 260: | Line 260: | ||
| ::::::*Started. —]] 13:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC) | ::::::*Started. —]] 13:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::*Bio, I suggest we first c/e the existing shit then add good content to it. When we finish our work, we'll replace the existing content. Then a DYK and after that a GA nom. Hows that for plan? ]. —]] 09:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC) | :::::::*Bio, I suggest we first c/e the existing shit then add good content to it. When we finish our work, we'll replace the existing content. Then a DYK and after that a GA nom. Hows that for plan? ]. —]] 09:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| Fuck off you Paki bastard. Go back to al-Qaeda. | |||
Revision as of 10:39, 23 February 2014
Lady Gagabut it is noot "as of now," the sixth best selling song, wouldn't it be better if wikipedia didn't contradict itself? Good Article ReviewsHey there, I noticed you had an article up at WP:GAN that I'd be interested in reviewing. Would you be interested in reviewing a nomination of mine, in return? My article nominated is Josh Hutcherson. No pressure at all if you don't want to review it, you absolutely don't have to! It's just been what feels like forever that I've had that nomination listed so I figured I'd ask around if anyone wanted to do a review for a review. Gloss • talk 06:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
What happened!? :P Gloss • talk 04:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Lady Gaga Presents the Monster Ball Tour: At Madison Square GardenHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lady Gaga Presents the Monster Ball Tour: At Madison Square Garden you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Smile! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. In light of our previous online altercation, I thought this smile may further support our solidarity with each other as copyeditors for Misplaced Pages.--Soulparadox (talk) 19:59, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Revert of my edit on "Secret (Madonna song)"Hi! I saw that you reverted my edit on "Secret" which added "(credited later)" about Shep Pettibone's writing credit in the infobox. The information was already added for David Torn in "What It Feels Like for a Girl" and Ingrid Chavez for "Justify My Love" and I planned to do the same for the Erotica songs also written by Tony Shimkin ("Erotica", "Bad Girl" and "Bye Bye Baby"). Do you think that I should do that or simply delete them and explain it in the articles? Have a nice day. Amzer (talk) 19:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lady Gaga Presents the Monster Ball Tour: At Madison Square GardenThe article Lady Gaga Presents the Monster Ball Tour: At Madison Square Garden you nominated as a good article has passed Updates for Amish Tripathi, The Immortals of meluha, The Secret of the nagas and The Oath of the VayuputrasHello, Since I never got your mail, have posted all the updates to be done here. Following are the updates.
Also include “around the world”. So the sentence will be “The Immortals of Meluha, The Secret of the Nagas and The Oath of the Vayuputras have been released in the Indian subcontinent and around the world in various languages. (please add the 2 earlier sources as they are same.)
English (South Asia), Hindi, Marathi, Bengali, Gujarati, Assamese, Malayalam, Telugu, Kannada, Bahasa Indonesian, Tamil and English (UK).
English (South Asia), Hindi, Marathi, Gujarati, Assamese, English (UK) and Telugu.
English (South Asia), Hindi, Telugu. And also can you add a new section of Adaptations just like the Official page of Author Amish. And update the language editions accordingly. Kindly please update the respective pages at the earliest. Thank you for your support! Dreamcurves (talk) 08:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Oh! that's strange i had been eagerly waiting, but i haven't received any email can you please forward it again. Let me know when you do. Thanks! Dreamcurves (talk) 11:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, Can you please tell me by when can you do the changes to the pages. Let me know. Dreamcurves (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for your response! can you forward me the email again as i informed you earlier i hav not received any email in your name. Kindly resend the mail at dreamcurves@gmail.com and the updates to the pages are actually important and so that it is well organized. Dreamcurves (talk) 12:36, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Gary BarlowHi, IndianBio, I can't edit because of semi-protection, help me check if there's an unsourced genre in infobox. According to Allmusic he is a pop vocalist, which means the genre is pop. His fellow boyband Take That is also pop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.171.179.159 (talk) 17:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Dope (Lady Gaga song)Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dope (Lady Gaga song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Dope (Lady Gaga song)The article Dope (Lady Gaga song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold ReanimationThe remix album Reanimation really has 2 million sales! You can check this at the wikipedia page of Remix Albums. There I think is written that it is the best selling hip hop remix album as well as the fourth best selling remix album! It has been certified platinum. And had a peak position of #2 on Billboard 200. So please add this album to the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.194.62.119 (talk) 03:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Dope (Lady Gaga song)The article Dope (Lady Gaga song) you nominated as a good article has passed FLC favor!Hey IndianBio! How are you? Dealing with problematic users, I see... If you have some trouble with them and I do not see it, just ping me. Anyway, I would like for you to do me I favor. I nominated Jake Gyllenhaal filmography for featured list; do you have some spare time to read it and comment on its FLC? I would be very grateful. Cheers! — Tomíca 13:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
AB Award!
Gee, thanks @Another Believer:, when is our ArtRave happening? Lol. —Indian:BIO · 16:55, 7 February 2014 (UTC) Josh_HutchersonHi, I just looked at the above as it is about to appear on the MP as a result of it becoming GA. I thought I would let you know I have reservations about the quality of the prose. I have already removed some text in the article, but there are other problems. For example, I feel there is excess detail about the critical appraisal and technical merits (or otherwise) of Polar Express, as these factors are completely unrelated to his performance, and well outside Hutcherson's control, so I think should be removed. I won't bore you any more for now. Some of the issues I had reservations about were dealt with by me here. Regards, -- Ohc 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC) PS Hope the script is working well for you. -- Ohc 03:26, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Revert of my edit on Applause (Lady Gaga song) (chord progression)Hi, months ago you reverted an edit I had made to the chord progression section for Applause. I never quite understood why, as to my mind not only is the Gm progression correct, but also clearly what is in the source given by the unsigned commenter on the Talk Page. The article gives a chord progression with the song transposed into the key of E minor, however G minor is the original key, as the article itself states in the very same sentence. This is what I was trying to correct. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Applause_(Lady_Gaga_song)&diff=next&oldid=574734715 Jonathan B (talk) 12:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
ApplauseLet's divide works on the article. Maybe I can take care of the "Composition" and "Reception" sections. What do you think? — Simon (talk) 13:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of MDNA World TourHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article MDNA World Tour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.
Your GA nomination of MDNA World TourThe article MDNA World Tour you nominated as a good article has passed Scheiße (song) PageHi, Yes, I think it's a mistake. This music video got rights from Universal Music Publishing France and Sony/ATV Music France for use the music on this video. It means managers and artists are agree with the screenplay and gave their agree. It is like music in the movies. You obtain a synchronization licensing. 86.73.136.157 (talk) 16:31, 10 February 2014 (UTC) So maybe add a paragraph ? I think you're in wrong, seriously. 86.73.136.157 (talk) 21:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
You're Mine (Eternal)Hi, this isn't a war to happen and it will never be. I'm just following the basic format of all the other music articles... Okay I'm trying to be perfectionist at it but it might not be working that much. Can you recommend me about some VERY professional and advanced users that will help me to write a well articulated structure for You're Mine (Eternal) just like This one. Thank you fidelovkurt 10:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of I Don't Give AHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article I Don't Give A you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. World Music Awards 2014 6 nom madonnahttp://www.madonnaglam.com/news/madonna-nominated-at-world-music-awards-2014/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjavier1978 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
ARTPOP Critical ReceptionSeeing as how we've had issues with STATic in the past (converting the Venus (Lady Gaga song) page to one of a promotional single was a chore), I thought I'd bring the issue to your attention. The consensus listed on the ARTPOP page is factually inaccurate; Metacritic is the only source that those who argue for the "mixed to positive" consensus are willing to cite, even though Metacritic forms a conglomerate of reviews for the sole purpose of using them to form a weighted, calculated score and consensus. In the matter of this album, the consensus is "generally favorable". You've brought up the fact that there are more mixed reviews listed on the cite, but I'd like to combat that statement with multiple points: 1) Focusing on the number of categorical reviews is overly simplistic; It doesn't tell the whole story. It's also not the approach that Metacritic, the source where this information is coming from, adheres to. Picking and choosing information from a source and ignoring others doesn't make any sense. 2)Even if you were to go by the standard of focusing on the number of reviews in each category (again, an act that Metacritic, the source being cited, does do practice), twelve of the reviews that are listed as "mixed" are literally one percentage point below being listed as entirely positive and cannot simply be passed off as mixed. They consist mostly of 3/5 star or 3 and a half/5 star reviews, otherwise known as positive reviews with reservations. If those reviews are discounted, the vast majority that STATic has been claiming to exist in the mixed section evaporates. 3) You stated that "people who follow music related news can simply blurt it out for you", referring to the idea that the consensus is mixed; I realize that gossip sites and the blogosphere has had a field day with the dip in critical acclaim for Gaga (it's always fun to tear down those on top, I guess), but you can't go by what gossip sites say; yes, the acclaim is less than her previous works, but the trend is still generally positive, as proven by the consensus listed on Metacritic and the consensus reported by an actually credible journal (the Huffington Post source I listed on the ARTPOP talk page that states that the consensus was positive from the multitude of critics that they sourced and linked to). As dealers of fact, it is our job to ignore the noise of the blogosphere and report on what is sourced and provable; in this case, the critical consensus is generally positive. There has been some talk that I'd like the consensus to simply read "positive", but that's not the case. I recognize that the reaction has been more ambivilant than her previous works, and have advocated for a disclaimer being listed after the (sourced and factual) consensus of "generally positive". The reception page should read that the album "recieved generally positive reviews, although the response was much more ambivalent in comparison to Gaga's previous work", as this addresses the obvious issues that users have raised as well as reports the consensus as it truly is according to sourced fact. I'd very much like your help on righting this issue as you seem to recognize that STATic has a generally domineering personality and doesn't like his authority questioned (as evidenced by the multiple complaints on his talk page) and has ignored the facts in lieu of his own synthesized narrative based on his own research, which violates the WP:OR guidelines. Reece Leonard (talk) 17:48, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Artpop". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot 19:34, 19 February 2014 (UTC) Katy Perry PRISMHi there, It's great to meet you. :) Can you edit PRISM so that the singles section can say that 'International Smile' was a single in Australia's radio? I heard it today, like really, on the radio! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.174.41.161 (talk) 10:31, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Dedh IshqiyaA month and 10 days have passed, its high time we start working on the article. —Soham 10:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Fuck off you Paki bastard. Go back to al-Qaeda. |
