| Revision as of 23:55, 8 March 2014 editNE Ent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors20,717 edits revert removal of comments of unsanctioned editors (part i)← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:56, 8 March 2014 edit undoNE Ent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors20,717 edits part iiNext edit → | ||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
| At ] I've asked the Arbitration Committee about its response to the unblock request. —] 21:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | At ] I've asked the Arbitration Committee about its response to the unblock request. —] 21:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| I hope that you can soon continue the necessary, good work that you did if you can promise not be overzealous again and promise not to out people again. ] (]) 11:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:56, 8 March 2014
Template:Archive box collapsible
A beer for you!
|
Hope you come back one day. --evrik 23:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC) |
- Will, I hope that ArbCom takes up your appeal and agrees to allow you to return to editing. Cullen Let's discuss it 01:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Current status
redacted
- Have restored this content. No reason to delete it without going through proper channels. Arbcom is free to not comment. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:25, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
handling of unblock request
At Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#change_to_block_of_User:Will_Beback I've asked the Arbitration Committee about its response to the unblock request. —rybec 21:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
I hope that you can soon continue the necessary, good work that you did if you can promise not be overzealous again and promise not to out people again. Andries (talk) 11:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)