| Revision as of 05:46, 10 March 2014 editFuavudalang (talk | contribs)52 edits Undid revision 598944356 by Dr.K. (talk) I'm only trying to help him← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:46, 10 March 2014 edit undoDr.K. (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers110,824 edits Reverted 1 edit by Fuavudalang (talk): Rv trolling. (TW★TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| :Will, I hope that ArbCom takes up your appeal and agrees to allow you to return to editing. ] ] 01:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC) | :Will, I hope that ArbCom takes up your appeal and agrees to allow you to return to editing. ] ] 01:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::Will should use socks. Fuck ArbCom. ] (]) 05:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ===Current status=== | ===Current status=== | ||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
| I hope that you can soon continue the necessary, good work that you did if you can promise not be overzealous again and promise not to out people again. ] (]) 11:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC) | I hope that you can soon continue the necessary, good work that you did if you can promise not be overzealous again and promise not to out people again. ] (]) 11:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :Will should use socks. ] (]) 05:40, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Some advice == | |||
| Hi Will. I see that you have recently been making pathetic, grovelling apologies for your past behavior in the desperate hope that someone will be prepared to unblock you. Take my advice: just don't bother with that kind of nonsense. If you want to edit Misplaced Pages, you should use sockpuppets. That's what most banned editors do. There's always a risk that your socks will be discovered, but so long as you're careful and avoid behaviors that might give you away as a sock, the danger is quite low. So go ahead Will: sock away.] (]) 05:16, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:46, 10 March 2014
Template:Archive box collapsible
A beer for you!
|
Hope you come back one day. --evrik 23:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC) |
- Will, I hope that ArbCom takes up your appeal and agrees to allow you to return to editing. Cullen Let's discuss it 01:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Current status
redacted
- Have restored this content. No reason to delete it without going through proper channels. Arbcom is free to not comment. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:25, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
handling of unblock request
At Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#change_to_block_of_User:Will_Beback I've asked the Arbitration Committee about its response to the unblock request. —rybec 21:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
I hope that you can soon continue the necessary, good work that you did if you can promise not be overzealous again and promise not to out people again. Andries (talk) 11:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)