| Revision as of 21:21, 7 February 2014 editAnonimski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,593 editsm Anonimski moved page Sound of fingernails scraping chalkboard to Chalkboard scraping: more general← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:03, 17 March 2014 edit undoNeljack (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,779 edits Include the British English name in parentheses - I was initially confused by the reference to a chalkboard, wondering if it was different to a blackboardNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Scraping a ''']''' with the ''']''' produces a sound which most people find extremely irritating. The basis of this innate reaction has been studied in the field of ]. | Scraping a ''']''' (also known as a blackboard) with the ''']''' produces a sound which most people find extremely irritating. The basis of this innate reaction has been studied in the field of ]. | ||
| ==The primate heritage hypothesis== | ==The primate heritage hypothesis== | ||
Revision as of 07:03, 17 March 2014
Scraping a chalkboard (also known as a blackboard) with the fingernails produces a sound which most people find extremely irritating. The basis of this innate reaction has been studied in the field of psychoacoustics.
The primate heritage hypothesis
One explanation for the adverse reaction is that the sound is similar to the warning call of a primate. However, a study using Cottontop Tamarins, a New World Monkey, found that they react similarly to both high-pitched sounds similar to fingernails on chalkboard, and to amplitude-matched white noise. In contrast, humans are less averse to the white noise than to scraping.
A 1986 study used a tape-recording of a three-pronged garden tool similar to a fork being "grided" across a chalkboard, which roughly reproduces the sound of fingernails on chalkboard. The recording was then manipulated, removing pitches at the extremities and the median. The results were then played back. It was determined that the median pitches are in fact the primary cause of the adverse reaction, not the highest pitches as previously thought. The authors hypothesized that it was due to predation early in human evolution; the sound bore some resemblances to the alarm call of macaque monkeys, or it may have been similar to the call of some predator. This research won one of the authors, Randolph Blake, an Ig Nobel Prize in 2006. More recent research contradicts this hypothesis.
The physical hypothesis
A 2011 study by musicologists Michael Oehler and Christoph Reuter has led its authors to hypothesize that the unpleasantness of the sound is caused by acoustic resonance due to the shape of the human ear canal which amplifies certain frequencies, especially those in the range of 2000 to 4000 Hz (the median pitches mentioned above), at such a level that the sound would trigger pain in our ears.
See also
References
- Roger Highfield (2005-11-14). "Study seeks root of noises that annoy us". Vancouver Sun. p. A6.
- Lynn Halpern, Randolph Blake, & James Hillenbrand (1986). "Psychoacoustics of a chilling sound" (PDF). Perception and Psychophysics. Psychonomic Society. pp. 77–80.
{{cite web}}: External link in|publisher= - "Fingernails on a Chalkboard Garner Psychologist Ig Nobel Prize". 2006-10-08. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
- Trevor J. Cox (2008). "Scraping sounds and disgusting noises". Applied Acoustics. 69 (12): 1195. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2007.11.004.
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3655174
- http://www.acoustics.org/press/162nd/Oehler_4pPP6.html
 | This psychology-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |