Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jojhutton: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:11, 19 March 2014 editAhnoneemoos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,167 edits →Sevastopol and BRD← Previous edit Revision as of 18:17, 19 March 2014 edit undoJojhutton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,497 edits →Sevastopol and BRD: reNext edit →
Line 140: Line 140:
:Use the article talk page if you wish to discuss changes to the article. NPOV is non negotiable and violations will be reverted on site.--] ]</font> 18:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC) :Use the article talk page if you wish to discuss changes to the article. NPOV is non negotiable and violations will be reverted on site.--] ]</font> 18:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
:: Your claim to NPOV violation is unsubstantiated. Furthermore, your second revert is a violation to ] per ]. Misplaced Pages is a collaborative space, when you ''believe'' something to be NPOV then you use a template such as {{tl2|POV}}, {{tl2|NPOV-inline}}, or {{tl2|undue}} to then engage in a collaborative discussion in order to reach consensus rather than to revert as what you ''believe'' to be correct. I will be reporting this case to ] as you have refused to engage in a discussion on your talk page as shown above. &mdash;] (]) 18:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC) :: Your claim to NPOV violation is unsubstantiated. Furthermore, your second revert is a violation to ] per ]. Misplaced Pages is a collaborative space, when you ''believe'' something to be NPOV then you use a template such as {{tl2|POV}}, {{tl2|NPOV-inline}}, or {{tl2|undue}} to then engage in a collaborative discussion in order to reach consensus rather than to revert as what you ''believe'' to be correct. I will be reporting this case to ] as you have refused to engage in a discussion on your talk page as shown above. &mdash;] (]) 18:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
:::Sorry but you don't get to make these mass changes that violate Wikipedias Neutrality policies and then claim that I am so how the bad guy. You made a bold change, I reverted you and then you are suppose to discuss on the talk page, not . That not how dispute resolution works.--] ]</font> 18:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:17, 19 March 2014

Jojhutton is suffering from physical health issues. This may affect his ability to work on Misplaced Pages. Consequently, he may not be able to respond to talk-page messages or e-mails in a timely manner. Your patience is greatly appreciated.


If you leave me a message here, I will answer here

This page is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This editor is a Senior Editor III and is entitled to display this Rhodium Editor Star.
40,000+This user has made more than 40,000 contributions to Misplaced Pages.
This user contributes using an
iMac.
This user contributes using an
iPad.
[REDACTED] This user is one of the 2000 most active English Wikipedians of all time.
This user is a new page patroller.
This user has been on Misplaced Pages for 16 years, 10 months and 2 days.
This user has rollback rights on the English Misplaced Pages. (verify)
On Ye June 2010, in the year of the 'pedia Jojhutton came 2502 on this measure of editcountitis.
This user is interested in the
History of the
United States of America.
[REDACTED] This user is a participant in
WikiProject Baseball.

Life is grand

This editor is a
Senior Editor III
and is entitled to display this Rhodium
Editor Star.


List of American television programs by date

Archiving icon
Archives

What has come before 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11


This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Regarding House of Cards (U.S. TV series)

The information that Janine moves to her mother's after Zoe's death was totally irrelevant and only acted as a major spoiler. Just as noting that Frank kills Zoe off. A cast and character section shouldn't contain such a major spoiler. I went there to find out more about the actress portraying Zoe after watching four episodes of the show, but I feel like I could just as wel quit watching now.

March 9 edit-a-thon at MOCA in downtown LA

LA Meetup: March 9 edit-a-thon at MOCA

Dear fellow Wikipedian,

You have been invited to a meetup and edit-a-thon at the Museum of Contemporary Art in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday, March 9, 2014 from 11 am to 6 pm! This event is in collaboration with MOCA and the arts collective East of Borneo and aims to improve coverage of LA art since the 1980s. (Even if contemporary art isn't your thing, you're welcome to join too!) Please RSVP here if you're interested.

I hope to see you there! User:Calliopejen1 (talk)

To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Wait!

You just can't wait, can you. Discussion has only been underway for 5 days. Please wait until discussion has ended. --AussieLegend (✉) 13:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

The discussion is over. Just because you fail to get the point and that you won't stop talking does not mean that the consensus has not been reached. You lost, its over. Nobody agrees with you and you need to just let it go.--JOJ 13:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
The discussion is not over while people are still discussing it and clearly, people are still discussing it. You really need to be far less aggressive in yor attitude towards discussions. Rememeber, Wikipeadia is a collaborative, not a combative project. --AussieLegend (✉) 13:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
No, you just won't stop talking. It's just you. Nobody else. Consensus is very evident. The fact that you won't accept that should have absolutely no bearing on the fact that everyone else thinks it should not be in the infobox. And you really need to drop the stick and move on. JOJ 13:41, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

IPhone 6 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IPhone 6. Since you had some involvement with the IPhone 6 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 10:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

WP:BRD ?

Sorry to bother You here, but I really don't see the point in your second reverting. Boeing720 (talk) 22:27, 18 March 2014 (UTC)I refer to the comment "see WP:BRD". The contence wasn't comprahendable to me, in this context. Where have I've been bold ? Boeing720 (talk) 22:32, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

You changed "is" to "was", that's being Bold, the I reverted you, then we discuss. You changed it twice it matters little that you think you are right, just that you follow policies. JOJ 22:40, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
You've missinterpreted me in "think you are right". You are aware of the referendum and its result ? That is a fact, not my invention. Add to that that Ukraine as of now, has no political or military control over the peninsula. You may on the other hand think that the referendum result doesn't matter (question, not an implication) ? By the way here is a speech from an American president, which have had a profound impact of matters as the current one on Crimea.

http://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/President_Wilson%27s_Fourteen_Points All the best Boeing720 (talk) 15:13, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

It's not what I think. It's the sources that say that the referendum is considered illegal by several countries. Yes there was a referendum, but no outside nation has recognized it. JOJ 15:44, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Cheers!

Thank you for the "thanks"!
— | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 23:46, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Sevastopol and BRD

WP:BRD is an essay, not a policy. Please cease reverting my changes as they adhere to WP:NPOV. Stating that the city is a Ukrainian city is not WP:NPOV as the city is currently in dispute between two nations, regardless of what the majority of the international community says. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 18:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Use the article talk page if you wish to discuss changes to the article. NPOV is non negotiable and violations will be reverted on site.--JOJ 18:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Your claim to NPOV violation is unsubstantiated. Furthermore, your second revert is a violation to WP:1RR per WP:ARBEURO. Misplaced Pages is a collaborative space, when you believe something to be NPOV then you use a template such as {{POV}}, {{NPOV-inline}}, or {{undue}} to then engage in a collaborative discussion in order to reach consensus rather than to revert as what you believe to be correct. I will be reporting this case to WP:1RR as you have refused to engage in a discussion on your talk page as shown above. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 18:11, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry but you don't get to make these mass changes that violate Wikipedias Neutrality policies and then claim that I am so how the bad guy. You made a bold change, I reverted you and then you are suppose to discuss on the talk page, not tell me to discuss them on the talk page. That not how dispute resolution works.--JOJ 18:17, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Category:
User talk:Jojhutton: Difference between revisions Add topic