| Revision as of 23:05, 29 March 2014 editThe Bushranger (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators157,476 edits →Topic ban: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:06, 31 March 2014 edit undoDetroit Joseph (talk | contribs)107 edits →Topic banNext edit → | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| By , you have been ] from editing ]. - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 23:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC) | By , you have been ] from editing ]. - ] <sub><font color="maroon">]</font></sub> 23:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :Alright. By the way, notice anything weird about the topic ban discussion? Anything at all? ] (]) 21:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:06, 31 March 2014
Recent edits to Old Main (Wayne State University)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Old Main (Wayne State University) article. While Misplaced Pages welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:46, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry. I'm new, still figuring it out. (Detroit Joseph (talk) 21:19, 23 October 2013 (UTC)).
Accusations of paid editing
Hello Detroit Joseph,
I have looked at the edit history of the editor who created Greening of Detroit, and see nothing in their pattern of editing that supports that theory. Though relatively inexperienced, they've made edits to a variety of topics, none of which anyone would pay them for. So, do you have any evidence for this claim?
I noticed that you nominated the article for deletion very shortly after it was created. How did this article come to your attention?
You claim that the organization is unimportant. The current version of the article shows that is notable by Misplaced Pages's standards, and has a multi-million dollar budget. How does the existence of this article interfere with you writing other articles about other notable Detroit organizations? That doesn't seem logical.
I am a Detroit native, by the way, though I now live in California. Please let me know if you need any advice about writing new articles. Cullen Let's discuss it 00:27, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Farshad Fotouhi
Let's start with . The facts there can be re-added, but only if they are in a neutral tone. Please start a draft at User:Detroit Joseph/Sandbox. John Reaves 22:52, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Replied at your talk page.
December 2013
Your recent editing history at Farshad Fotouhi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:35, 15 December 2013 (UTC).
- Detroit Joe is simply trying to maintain reference to recently published news events in an article where constant effort to delete credible published newspaper, and other articles, is being launched against him. Please consider the fact that Readers sincerely want a complete picture of the topic before you block an editor who (albeit passionately) is attempting to maintain reference to factual and relevant material! (Perhaps the other, party, Shobeir) who continually deletes these references to news articles should be blocked instead. Thank you (----) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Concerned Reader seeking Facts (talk • contribs) 03:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Formal request
This is a formal request for you to stay off my talk page, except for required administrative notices. Cullen Let's discuss it 21:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Topic ban
By the consensus of the Misplaced Pages community, you have been topic banned from editing Farshad Fotouhi. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Alright. By the way, notice anything weird about the topic ban discussion? Anything at all? Detroit Joseph (talk) 21:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)