| Revision as of 01:11, 3 April 2014 editEyesnore (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers38,627 edits Level 4 warning re. Sydney (HG)← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:31, 3 April 2014 edit undoVianello (talk | contribs)17,182 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Sydney. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ] '''This is your only warning'''. You may be '''blocked from editing without further warning''' the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-4im --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> ''']]</span>''' (]) 01:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC) | ] '''This is your only warning'''. You may be '''blocked from editing without further warning''' the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-4im --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> ''']]</span>''' (]) 01:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. {{Break}}''It appears you have only reverted three times since first instituting your edit on capitalization. Please be mindful to pursue dispute resolution rather than persisting in reverting, in order to avoid breaching this policy.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> - ] (]) 01:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:31, 3 April 2014
April 2014
This is your only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Sydney. Eyesnore (pc) 01:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Sydney shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
It appears you have only reverted three times since first instituting your edit on capitalization. Please be mindful to pursue dispute resolution rather than persisting in reverting, in order to avoid breaching this policy. - Vianello (Talk) 01:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)