| Revision as of 05:09, 3 April 2014 editViperSnake151 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers109,473 edits →Development of Windows XP: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:27, 3 April 2014 edit undoViperSnake151 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers109,473 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Development of Windows XP. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| The build list is poorly cited, and is ] ''and'' a ]. There are other websites you can get information like that from; Misplaced Pages is not one of them. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">]</font> ] </span> 05:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC) | The build list is poorly cited, and is ] ''and'' a ]. There are other websites you can get information like that from; Misplaced Pages is not one of them. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">]</font> ] </span> 05:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">]</font> ] </span> 05:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 05:27, 3 April 2014
June 2013
Hello, I'm Pratyya Ghosh. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to News Hour because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Pratyya 11:47, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
November 2013
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Dragon Nest has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dragon Nest was changed by 110.164.115.224 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880836 on 2013-11-10T05:03:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:03, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Dragon Nest, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Antoshi ☏ ★ 13:33, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
April 2014
Hello, I'm I am One of Many. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Windows XP without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! I am One of Many (talk) 04:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Development of Windows XP
The build list is poorly cited, and is fancruft and a changelog. There are other websites you can get information like that from; Misplaced Pages is not one of them. ViperSnake151 Talk 05:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Development of Windows XP shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ViperSnake151 Talk 05:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.