Misplaced Pages

User talk:Anupmehra: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:50, 6 April 2014 editSummichum (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,484 edits Your Edit request on Mufaddal Saifuddin: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 14:51, 6 April 2014 edit undoSummichum (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,484 edits A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove messageTag: WikiLoveNext edit →
Line 396: Line 396:
I would like you to continue with your edit request which the other two users were not able to contest. They are clearly pushing POV AND also have COI I would like you to continue with your edit request which the other two users were not able to contest. They are clearly pushing POV AND also have COI
] (]) 14:50, 6 April 2014 (UTC) ] (]) 14:50, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For Bohra articles ] (]) 14:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
|}

Revision as of 14:51, 6 April 2014

Anupmehra

Contribs —— Home —— Talk —— Email —— Identity —— Usercheck


User:Anupmehra/Break

The Signpost
24 December 2024
Archives Archive1, Archive2, Archive3, Archive4

Be polite, assume good faith and avoid personal attacks.
Sign and date your posts typing four tildes (~~~~)
Put new text under old text. Click here to leave me a new message.


TOC:    Go to bottom     Go to top

Please comment on Talk:Ronan Farrow

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ronan Farrow. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Added Alternate Usertalk.

Hi Anup, Added this quote {{Public user|srilaks}} to my talk page srirammano. Thanks for the help.

Hello Srirammano- Add this template on your alternative account userpage instead. I probably mis-spelled earlier. Consider signing your posts as well. Type four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. It'd generate your signature with date and time. Make edit tests here. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Anup, As per your advice tendered, i have added {{Public user|Srirammano}} ti srilaks account. Also added (Srilaks (talk) 04:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC))at the end of the article. Kindly have a look at it. I have also removed this {{Public user|srilaks}} account. Thank you.

Reg URL

Hi Anup, I have two url's to Contus. https://en.wikipedia.org/Contus https://en.wikipedia.org/Contus_(company) Is this ok. I prefer having the first url for us, if it has to be redirected to one page. Can you help me in this regard. ​Regards, Bright Livingstone Davidraj


Team Lead, Digital Marketing - Contus.com Phone: +91 95000 80937 |Gtalk: brightlivingstone@contus.in — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srilaks (talkcontribs) 14:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Start a discussion on Contus talk page or the target article's talk page regarding this. You might, would like to read, WP:OWNERSHIP. And, I'm not sure why does your cell number and gtalk id comes after your every messages. It looks weird to me. I might reply late if you do not sign your posts typing four tildes (~~~~) further on (WP:SIGNATURE). Anupmehra -Let's talk! 19:19, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Second decline

Hi Anupmehra,

I am following up on this Misplaced Pages submission. http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Martin_Edward_Elkort I would like to request further details of why you rejected this submission a second time. I have spoken to a chat support after they were unable to tell me why. Martin is my father, so much of the content I have written based on fact. We have recently finished a documentary about his work which is debuting in early May. Since your first rejection, I put in as many footnotes and references as I was able to to support the entry. I had thought that I was thorough and re-reading it, there is nothing else that exists, either in print or online, that can support the entry. I'm not sure what else to do. I have also compared this entry to some of Martin's contemporaries' entries who show much less support yet were accepted. See for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/Harold_Feinstein where many of the footnote are to broken links and has much less sourcing than my article does. Please help me understand what I need to do to fix this. I am not a seasoned Wiki writer or editor, this may be one of only a few wikis I ever write, and I want to get it right. I'm just not sure what else I can do to pass your minimum standards and hope you can explain more to me. Thanks, Stefani Twyford 99.149.181.135 (talk) 20:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello IP 99.149.181.135- Your submission is declined for reasons given there in the red box on top of the submission page. It is a biography of living person and requires additional citations for verification. Your submission is declined twice for the same reason. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:03, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
In response to this, can you give me any help in what else requires additional citations? I'm not trying to be difficult here but I do not understand what else you are looking for. I've sourced everything that is source-able and have used many published profiles as guides. Can you provide me with a couple of examples of something in there and how to additionally cite it that would meet your acceptance? Stefani Twyford Stwyford (talk) 18:06, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
@Stwyford:- Put new texts under old texts. No need to start a new thread. Edit this page (see on top), find your thread, proceed. Coming to the poing, It requires a citation for each and every claim made in submission of living person. Did you read, Misplaced Pages guideline on biography of living person? If your have some source, then cite them. If you do not have. Simply remove them. For example, second line from "Career" section of the submission is, "He took his first professional photograph at the age of 10 while on a car trip with his parents to Baltimore". Can you Prove it? Such claims make this submission not incompliance with Misplaced Pages verifiability policy. And as you can see on your submission page, there's comment left for you, to find secondary, independent and reliable sources to establish notability of the subject. Most of the sources are not independent and sometimes doesn't even mention subject. Two issues for now: (a) Notability (b) Minimum inline citation. Resolve it, it'd qualify for inclusion on Misplaced Pages. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:36, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Toh Aik Choon

Dear Anuphmehra, concerning my submission for Toh Aik Choon, can you further advise me on what I can do to better my article so that it can accepted? Thank you very much Limchery (talk) 06:10, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Limchery- You can find wp:secondary, independent and reliable sources that discuss the subject of the submission in detail and cite them in the body of the article. It'd be suitable for inclusion thereafter. See, WP:BIO for a detailed guideline. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:03, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear Anupmehra, thank you for your advice, to prove that the subject was indeed part of an organization, is it appropriate to cite a company's memorandum of articles of association, this is a public company. Also, for titles such as honanary citizenship I do not have the links to 3rd party websites as it's probably in the archives, is there anyway to scan original documents as proof? Thank you. I've made some changes and wish to resubmit soon.~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Limchery (talkcontribs) 08:09, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello Limchery- Sources related to the subject are considered primary/self-published sources and doesn't help to establish notability of the subject. Subject requires significant coverage in the secondary, independent and reliable sources. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Vero Electronics Ltd declined

Hello Anupmehra - could you please give the reason for the decline of my submission = https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Vero_Electronics_Ltd Thanks Tfitzp (talk) 11:43, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Tfitzp- If you see on top of your submission page, there is a red box with reasons of decline. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:15, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your response. It would be very helpful if some indication could be given of the particular material which fails to meet Misplaced Pages's minimum standard for inline citations. Or would a live help chat with experienced editors be advisable ? Cheers Tfitzp (talk) 20:52, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
@Tfitzp:- "History" section requires some more. There's only one and that's insufficient. A wp:citation for a claim! You are also required to make few changes in accordance with Misplaced Pages neutral point of view policy. And, it'd be better if you write that "Timeline" section as prose (WP:Writing better articles). You can try live help chat here. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 21:01, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Resubmit done - not sure about the comments = 'A wp:citation for a claim!' & 'You are also required to make few changes in accordance with Misplaced Pages neutral point of view policy' Could you give specific details ? Cheers Tfitzp (talk) 14:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Women's History Month edit-a-thon!

Hi Anupamhera,
I saw your edit(s) to the articles listed for Women's History Month (India) ! Thank you for your contributions! Please consider signing up on the event page and help us create new articles about notable Indian women. Thanks!-- Netha (talk) 16:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Netha Hussain- I actually would like to participate to Women's History Month (India), but unfortunately I'm less available on 15 and 16th of this month. However, I'd request you to let me know the further events. Thank you! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 22:52, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
The women's history month events happen throughout the month. You could participate by writing articles about any notable Indian woman until the 31st of March. The results of your effort could be entered under the 'Results' section of this page. Thank you! -- Netha (talk) 05:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Recent new pages

Hi. I have moved your recent additions to user space as they appear to be intended as user subpages. Regards,  GILO   A&E 17:34, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Gilo1969- It was a honest mistake. I didn't knew I'm creating new submissions at inappropriate space. Yeah, I meant them to be in my userspace to later be modified and moved to mainspace. Thanks for your notification on my talk page, otherwise I could keep going on creating additional unnecessary tasks for new pages patrollers. However, I'd blame it on Carlsberg. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Punjabipedia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Punjab University and Punjab Government (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

review article MYRRHA

Hi,

On March 5th you rejected the article for the MYRRHA project which has 6 external sources with a rather good credibility I believe. The review is as follows: The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Misplaced Pages's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Could you please tell me what exactly you expect, or even better, would you propose some referenes ?

Thank you for your help, Antoine Dupré — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titoitoine (talkcontribs) 19:43, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Titoitoine- Later I noticed, the article already exists at Lead-cooled fast reactor. As anyone can edit wikipedia, you are requested to make required changes to the existing article. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Nifty tool

I was stalking a talk page and thought I'd let you know about Anomie's user identifier script. Pretty nifty :) — MusikAnimal 23:16, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello MusikAnimal- Thank you for letting me know such a tool for easier access to identify users. I was just wondering if it works on Modern skin as well. However, I've left a message to script coder on his talk page. Thanks again! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 23:29, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Tilmann Wröbel's page

Hi Anupmehra, first of all, thank you for contributing on my page, I've listened all your advices and I wanted to thank you. Can you please check my page to see with all the changes I've made if the Warning recommandations could be removed ? Thanks in advance for letting me know how can I improve this page. Best regards. --V-fire (talk) 09:32, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello V-fire- I would like to let you know that, Work submitted to Misplaced Pages can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone. Since you've submitted your submission to Misplaced Pages, it is not longer your page (see, WP:OWNERSHIP).
Coming to the point, I'll make an attempt to describe all four tags present there. First tag is a {{coi}} tag. As you are a connected contributor, it'd be there till you are a major contributor to that article (see, conflict of interest). Second tag, is for improper WP:LAYOUT of the article and can be removed once addressed. Third tag, is for lacking minimum references. Biography of living person requires additional citations for verification. Citations are used to identify reliable sources on which an article is based. See, referencing for beginners. Fourth tag, is for article not being in neutral point of view policy. Unsourced claims read a bit like an advertisement. Once the submission is made to have minimum references, it could be fixed easily. I can address 2 out 4 tags (tone, layout) once minref done. Almost all sources are either in French or German language, I've no idea about. Therefore I can not help with that (I earlier had horrible experience with google translator). COI would be there some more time. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 15:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing and for your advices, I'll fix it as soon as possible ! --V-fire (talk) 12:18, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Entando entry

Hello, please help me out by specifying what you find to be promotional in the following description http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Entando#Added_reference_links_for_notability I took out all the references that had been indicated as promotional by Sintaku (please note that the first editor to review the entry, EagerToddler39, had not indicated the tone as promotional even before this second amended version). Thanks in advance ~~03/17/2014 Hixkaryana~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.45.67.181 (talk) 18:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello IP 93.45.67.181/Hixkaryana- I suspect, you mis-understood when some reviewer declined your submission page as an advertisement. It is not references/sources but the tone of the article. For example, the present submission includes terms like, "free and available", "provides a responsive accessible interface" (could be only interface), "an Enterprise version is available", etc. considered peacock terms meant to show off the subject of the submission. We accept knowledgde not advertisement. And as you point to the first reviewer, I'd say, that's the primary concern, notability. Significant coverage in the secondary, independent and reliable sources. What I see now, is the only primary sources related to the subject (GitHub, Entando website). Jaspaer soft is a dead link. We need sources like this one, CRN.
Now what could you do in order to get you submission to be reviewed and moved to articles mainspace, (a) Establish notability (b) Make changes in accordance with neutral point of view policy avoiding peacock terms. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 19:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear Anupmehra,
please let me explain the sense of the "accessible" User Interface. It is not a peacock term since it is there to explain that the system is compliant with Section 508 in terms of accessibility for people with disabilities. I would then like to understand if there is a problem in saying that something is free: I would imagine that the information is more than relevant for users, so I need to understand if I need to worry more about conveying neutral or useful information. Similarly, I would imagine that it is equally informative to say there are two tiers (community = free and enterprise = not free) available. Please let me understand how I can convey useful information in a tone you deem acceptable.
Finally, could it be your encountered a temporary issue with the Jaspersoft link? at the moment it seems to be working properly: https://www.jaspersoft.com/sites/default/files/customer-case-studies/Jaspersoft_Entando%20Case%20Study.pdf
Thanks in advance, ~~Hixkaryana~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.45.56.194 (talk) 17:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Well, Github link not working (shows "not-found"). Above given Jasper link, is improperly cited in the article, that's why it didn't work, It is working now and looks good to me (significant coverage). However, I guess, just two sources (jasper and crn) would NOT be sufficient enough to establish notability (WP:42). Sinnova link doesn't have substantial coverage of the subject. And, If you feel your submission is in compliance with Misplaced Pages neutral point of view policy and doesn't require any clean-up, keep it as it is, feel free to re-submit it. For me, it still doesn't read knowledge, but an advertisement. Thank you! And one more thing, Remember signing your further posts typing four tildes (~~~~). Thank you again! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear Anupmehra,
Almost done with my article by including several secondary sources, for some parts, for eg. being an Honorary Citizen of a country etc. will you accept the subject's personal documents to verify facts and his achievements. Thank youLimchery (talk) 08:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello Limchery- It is not that, I do accept or decline, It is Misplaced Pages policy and guidelines. I didn't understand what do you mean by "personal documents". Please clarify! If you meant, self-published/primary sources then, as per WP:SELFPUB, it could be used sometimes as citations for the purpose of verification, but not for outstanding claims (see, WP:SELFPUB for more details). Anupmehra -Let's talk! 15:24, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Heads up

Hi,

Just informing you that while moving User talk:Highrez2, you ended up also moving the talk page sections, which I have now moved back. Also a heads up to User:Pigsonthewing to move any articles from talk page to sandbox/draftspace/any other alternate location.

Cheers, Soni (talk) (Previously TheOriginalSoni) 09:17, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

What does this have to do with me? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Andy Mabbett, please make sure you do not leave any drafts in user talk the next time you're reviewing them. It is likely to cause issues, so it's best to just make a simple move. Soni (talk) (Previously TheOriginalSoni) 00:28, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Bihar school examination board.png

Thanks for uploading File:Bihar school examination board.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Misplaced Pages. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 19:03, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Editing Vivek Lall's page

Hi, This is my first time I am trying to write an article for Dr. Vivek Lall. I had checked with the online help on Misplaced Pages, and they had informed me that the citations are fine, but maybe I can add more content. Please let me know what the real issue is here at hand, is it less content, because I thought, once it is accepted, I will slowly keep adding substantial information. Or the refrences, I have two sources for the little information provided. Please help me this. Thanks and regards :) Cactusfigure (talk) 06:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Cactusfigure- If you see at the top of your submission page, there's is a light pink box with reasons of decline. As you are asking me here, I'd quote the same here, See, Misplaced Pages notability guideline. In short, "subject requires significant coverage in the secondary, independent and reliable sources". Anupmehra -Let's talk! 09:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Qutbi Bohra

Are you planning to do anything more? The people there keep appealing to me and I'm out of my depth. DGG ( talk ) 18:16, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

@DGG: Ah, sorry for that. Just noticed the article is nominated for deletion again (thrice in last 48 days). I've no interest on that particular topic. I remember now, I earlier promised to make several edits and examine sources. Well, I'll do it in next few hours. For present AfD, I'm perhaps going to copy-paste my previous arguments. I feel the present AfD should be closed with "No consensus" again and the nominator should be let known of community consensus established here (If the XfD discussion was closed as “no consensus”, do not renominate the page for at least two months). Thank you for letting me know. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. I appreciate your involvement and trust you would do what is appropriate.Regards and happy editing. Mufaddalqn (talk) 14:37, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello Mufaddalqn- I must thank you for your trust, at the same time, I would request you to review newly re-written article and comment on article's talk page related to further improvements should be made and to consider withdrawing your AfD nomination to save the community time. Cheers! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 14:49, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
I have widrawn my nomination for Afd Mufaddalqn (talk) 16:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks again! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:19, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Battle of Berlin

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Battle of Berlin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Dear Anup Mehra Review Request

Dear Anup Mehra! Adab & Thanks for your last response for review, regarding notability I have given Two Most Reliable/Verifiable sources in support of My Article Azhar Naazir, A Pakistani Writer/Poet's Stub. A) The Recent Article About Poet & His Recently Publishec Book in The Leading English Daily, The News Intl (Weblink Given in Referencing; B) A Link Has Been Given As a Second Most Reliable Source for Men Of Letters In Pakistan's Pakistan Academy Of Letters' Website Showing The Profile/ Introductory Details Of Poet Alongwith His Publication Too, The Site Is Maintained By Pakistan Academy Of Letters (Government Of Pakistan) Officially.

So, in the presence of above Two Possibly Most Authentic Sources supporting my Article, I am completely at az Loss to understand the Reasons Of Rejection Of My Article, citing Reasons that it should be notable/ verifiably sourced. Thanks for a Your Attention & Help.Regards.Azhartokyo (talk) 17:08, 23 March 2014 (UTC).

Hello Azhartokyo- Yes, I noticed there are two reliable sources in the references section. Your submission is a biography of living person and as per wikipedia notability guideline, it requires significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. I believe subject is notable but notability is not established in the submission following lack of multiple reliable sources. Find some more reliable sources and consider citing your sources in the body of the article. See, referencing for beginners. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:29, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks A Lot Anup Mehra! I Think Your Above Response Is Helpful and giving a hint of what went wrong in my previous submissions, I don't want to upload any biographic information about the Subject, but just want The Writer/ Poet's Name Inclusded in the list of Pakistani Poet Initially On Stub Format & shall Be grateful if you could guided me further, Accordingly. Stay Blessed! Regards.Azhartokyo (talk) 17:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC).
@Azhartokyo:I'm sure there are some more references out there. Find just two or three of them and let me know here. I'll help you creating your article and making it in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy and guidelines. Happy editing!! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:51, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks A Lot Sir! I am so Obliged, Stay Blessed, I Shall Be furnishing You Two More References.Regards.Azhartokyo (talk) 17:54, 23 March 2014 (UTC).
5 More Relevant/Supporting Web-links are appended hereunder for your kind Advice/Help Sir:-
http://www.welovepoems.com/members/AzharNaazir.htm
http://spgist.com/all/443842307054632961
http://islamabad.olx.com.pk/q/publishers-in-islamabad/c-215
http://m.ztopics.com/Azhar%20Naazir/
http://m.ztopics.com/Kanch%20ki%20Nagri
Dear Sir, Right Now I am giving here above five (5) weblinks of independent 3 rd Party Sites Displaying The Poetry Of Azhar Naazir & remaining ,I think they might serve the purpose Alongwith 2 Reliable sources already There In The Article, I would be grateful if you could help me in inclusion of References & Editing To Make it Wiki Compliant Now, Stay Blessed, Regards.Azhartokyo (talk) 18:28, 23 March 2014 (UTC).
Sir, Above Web links Also direct to Poetic Contributions & Book Of Azhar Naazir,i.e, Kanch Ki Nagri Published In September 2013, I deem that Above four/five Third Party Site Links/Proofs will suffice To Serve The Purpose.I Shall Be waiting eagerly for your response.Thanks! Stay Blessed! Regards.Azhartokyo (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC).
@Azhartokyo: I'm sorry but none of the above listed sources could be considered reliable sources. See, Misplaced Pages reliable source examples. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 21:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Anup Mehra For Clarification, but I would appreciate if you could advise dm a a shorter Stub/Non Biographical in Nature which can be supported by 2 Already Reliable Sources Available with the Article and the same may be expanded later when more Reliable Sources Are Available.Thanks.Azhartokyo (talk) 03:59, 24 March 2014 (UTC).
Dear Sir, I have removed most of bio graphical stuff from the Article and have left A Brief information in Writer's Stub format Compliant/ Verifiable from 2 Reliabe sources already there as the top References which I presume is a Wiki Compliant Stuff Now. Have Resubmitted Afresh. Pl Have A Look When Convenient. Stay Blessed, Regards.Azhartokyo (talk) 04:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC).
Article written about a living person is considered a "biography of a living person". Subject must be notable as per Misplaced Pages notability guideline. It is not that you'll remove biographical/additional details from an article about a living person and it'd help subject to escape notability standard. It simply would not work! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 16:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Dear Anup Mehra! I have just added a few more references, and would be much obliged if you could just have a look and give your valuable support & Advice. Thanks & Regards.Azhartokyo (talk) 16:52, 1 April 2014 (UTC).

Final Submission of a descriptive article about Surdhuni Library

Dear Anup ji, I have submitted a descriptive article on a newly established library named Surdhuni library. the article covers its description, work etc. I really hope that, you will allow it for final publishing. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oikya roy (talkcontribs) 14:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Oikya roy- May I have link to your submission page? As I can see your contribution log, there's only AfC submussion WT:Articles for creation/Surdhuni Library (not-submitted) and It is quite confusing! See, WP:Your first article and WP:Writing better articles. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 16:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks a lot for your help ! aks 07:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

DPS Servodaya Nagar Wiki Approval

Kindly find the wiki link of servodaya nagar , i have made few amendments by including more 3rd party sources , kindly let me know if any improvement needed ! https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Delhi_Public_School_Servodaya_Nagar --aks 07:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

@Aks2103:- Some more sources! And you do not manually need to type "--aks 07:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)", type (~~~~) at the end of your post. It'll produce your signature with date and time. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 07:46, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Mufaddal Saifuddin claimant dispute

I am writing you as you seem to know the dispute , the editors Mufaddalqn and Md.et are deliberately adding partisan blog sources as references to show that succession was granted to some Mufaddal Saifuddin but this compromises the article for NPOV and hence after several discussions on talk pages the two users are persistent to add their blog sources which represent the camp of Mufaddal hence I request your experienced intervention and make the article NPOV . The two users are adding statements like "Nass was granted to Mufaddal" while we know that this disputed and extremely controversial and a legal angle has emerged. Hence I request your neutral intervention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Summichum (talkcontribs) 08:15, 26 March 2014 (UTC) My diff :

Hello Summichum- Thanks for your kind consideration. Yes, I'm partially aware of the dispute while participating in Qutbi Bohra AfDs (1, 2) and re-writing Qutbi Bohra article. I need some time to read article talk page messages and article contents to figure out biased nature of article. Unreliable source and contents based on the same must immediately be removed. In addition, I'd like to let you know some places where could you reach in case of similar cases, if you personally do not find someone to interfere, Third opinion, Request for comments and Dispute resolution. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 08:48, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear Anupmehra. The User Summichum has asked your help.He has consistently plagiarized the article of Dawoodi Bohra and mufaddal saifuddin. twice he was blocked, yet again he is upto his old tactics. he also tried to block me and fellow editor who do not agree to his view, but failed. his conduct is highly unethical.his sole purpose to join Misplaced Pages, it seems, is to promote his agenda. trust you would not be partial in this matter.Mufaddalqn (talk) 05:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Rejection of my submission Heera Singh Rana

Mr. Anupmehra. My submission on Articles for creation/Heera Singh Rana, https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Heera_Singh_Rana, a well known and veteran folk singer and lyricist has been again rejected for reasons not known to me. Though I have tried to give available online resources/links. Some of the links are in the form of his songs available on various sites including Youtube. Please help me create this article and make it available on Wiki. The subject in consideration is not a personal friend or an advertisement either. This is just to record some information about a public figure lest the rain of time washes away everything. Girdhar.joshi (talk) 07:16, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Girdhar.joshi- Your submission is declined because the subject doesn't meet the Misplaced Pages notability standard. It requires significant coverage in secondary, independent and reliable sources (see, light-pink decline box on top of your submission page). Make changes accordingly and re-submit. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 12:25, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks a lot Mr.anupmehra - I have made one correction and added one more online link in the article https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Heera_Singh_Rana . Since for the regional notable personalities most of the references are available on print media, so online references are in scarcity. Please see if this article is now notable and worth publishing. Thanks.Girdhar.joshi (talk) 07:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
@Girdhar.joshi: You can cite offline sources, as well. See, referencing for beginners. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 08:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

References

All references have been removed except one. The remaining reference is a link to an article appearing on a third party website. This article details an Oracle project undertaken by Megabyte and is posted by Oracle on their website.

Please advise if this needs to be removed also and if by removing this the submission will be accepted. All other comments made previously by your colleagues have been addressed. Megabytemalta (talk) 08:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Megabytemalta- Your submission was declined because it is not in compliance with Misplaced Pages notability guideline for companies and organizations. It requires significant coverage in secondary, independent and reliable sources (see, light-pink decline box on top of your submission page). You should not remove sources but add multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources to establish notability of the subject. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 12:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Thank you for the effort you're putting into Mufaddal Saifuddin it is very much appreciated! Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 03:16, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Ah, I love tea! Thanks for it. I've earlier been engaged into a similar article (Qutbi Bohra), that ended up me re-writing as a whole. I hope, the trick would still be working. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 03:37, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi! Anupmehra, thanks for your efforts in various articles! As an experienced editor, your knowledge is very valuable to new editors. Teahouse Hosts help new editors at the Teahouse and beyond. Mufaddalqn (talk) 11:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your RfA support

Hi Anupmehra, a bit of a form letter from me, Cyphoidbomb, but I wanted to drop you a line and thank you for your support at my recent RfA. Although I was not successful, I certainly learned quite a bit both about the RfA process and about how the community views my contributions. It was an eye-opener, to say the least. Thank you for your support. Had I been confirmed, I would have done my best to make the community, and you, proud. :) Looking forward to future constructive discussions with you! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:44, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Cyphoidbomb, I'm sorry to learn about your RfA. I just visited the page and found it is closed with no consensus. I knew it'd be little close taking into consideration some valid concerns raised by some good editors. Hope, it'd not affect your abilities and you'll be bouncing back again in a year with all those concerns addressed. I'd say, I love what you do around here and you've my support all the time. Keep the good works up! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:01, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Shirley Temple

This new editor is a date-format warrior; all their contributions (about 20) have been to change MDY dates to DMY dates. That's usually fine, but on Shirley Temple there's consensus for MDY dates. I warned them, but this kind of thing never ends well. Anyway, thanks for your rejection over there.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

FEVER THERAPY

Hi, regarding Fever Therapy page linked to Coley's Toxins - this is a completely genuine addition / reference although possibly in need of further development. What are you specific recommendations or objections? I have a couple of my own suggestions including a heading on the original Coley Toxin page "Fever Therapy in Literature." I also considered making reference to an article in New Scientist on 8th January 2014, although I need to check details on this. There is another reference to a medical publication in the 1950s I'd like to check out too and happy to add as a footnote. I'm new to this and planned to improve / edit my entry as well as make other linked Literary references so I welcome all of your suggestions.Jim 90.216.163.181 (talk) 22:01, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Jimburnside- First recommendation is to "log in" your account before making further edits. Second is to review, Misplaced Pages general notability guideline and make changes accordingly to your article Fever therapy. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 07:17, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fenelon Township

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fenelon Township. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Pioneer 360 Business Center Speedy Deletion

The page probably should be removed. In hindsight, it probably is not significant enough to remain on Misplaced Pages. Satanhhh (talk) 13:06, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Standard Chemical Company?

Hi there, Just got your message about the speedy deletion of the Standard Chemical Company. I am not sure what the deal is, perhaps you are a bot-I don't know.I am at a loss as to why you would do this considering the creation of the page was barely 10 minutes old!? let me explain, I am trying to tie up some loose ends /links that would be created/rectified with the creation of this new article. Namely United States Radium Corporation, Radium Dial Company, Undark, Radium jaw, Radium Girls and a few others. Can you possibly give me some time as (perhaps I should have written it in a sandbox first?) anyway, I don't mean to sound nasty, so kind regards--Read-write-services (talk) 05:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

@Read-write-services: Your wrote an article about a subject that fails Misplaced Pages notability guideline for company and organizations. And, you should work in your user space or AfC draft not in articles main space. If still not ready, move the present article to your user space and work on there as long as you wish. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 05:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Doris Day

I submitted that Doris Day, born Doris Mary Ann Kappelhoff was born in 1924, not 1922. You rejected my request as incorrect data, then somehow the date of birth on your Doris Mary Ann Kappelhoff page changed from 1924 to 1922. If you visit Dorisday.com, Dorisday.net, biography.com/people/doris-day or any of the multiple references available, I believe you will find that Misplaced Pages is the only reference to her DOB as 1922. She was born in 1924. If you could edit the Doris day page to say 1924 in multiple locations within the page and return the Doris Mary Ann Kappelhoff to read 1924 in multiple locations within the page, I'm sure I, many fans and Doris Day herself would be very appreciative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Piper123 (talkcontribs) 11:25, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

@Mark Piper123: See, Talk:Doris_Day#Date_of_birth. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 11:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Milorganite

The result was Speedy keep or Keep But the result doesn't show. Thank you. 7&6=thirteen () 13:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello 7&6=thirteen- Thank you for letting me know. I've fixed it. Cheers! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen () has given you a Dobos Torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos Torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen () 15:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
For Mufaddal Saifuddin Summichum (talk) 18:51, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

speedy deletion

What is your issue with what I said I am new to this but all of that was fact and not fiction it has been almost 20 years since then. Yet you keep the people asking about snoop dog — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droopy81 (talkcontribs) 01:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Vashishtha Narayan Singh

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Vashishtha_Narayan_Singh

Please help me create a page for living mathematician Vashishtha Narayan Singh from Bihar, India.boomboom 05:16, 4 April 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bishwa 777 (talkcontribs)

Hello Bishwa 777- If you see on top of your submission page, there is a light-pink decline box with reasons of decline and few help links to improve your submission page. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 13:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Rename User: request processs on mr-wikipedia completed

Hi,

Your Rename_User:IndianWikipedian_to_User:Anup_by_Ususrpation request on Marathi Misplaced Pages has been implemented and you are kindly requested to use newly assigned User:Anup account on Marathi Misplaced Pages. And you are expected to avoid using previous(old) changed user name hence forth.

By the way I am just curious, even after change of name you are using two accounts on en wikipedia you seem to be using User:Anup and User:Anupmehra simultaneouslly. Or these two account users are different ?

Mahitgar (talk) 11:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello Mahitgar- Thank you for processing my usurpation request. Yes, I've two Misplaced Pages accounts. User:Anupmehra is my primary account and User:Anup is a an alternative one. It is permitted to have multiple accounts, if declared on the respective userpage (in this case, User:Anup), as per WP:VALIDALT. Thank you again, Anupmehra -Let's talk! 12:42, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Per say issue in my mind is not at all about having more than one user account, just simply it was just an effort to understand how fellow wikipedians think about their user account names.
Regards Mahitgar (talk) 04:59, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Well, some find themselves comfortable using their real name, some doesn't. I belong to first "some". Anupmehra -Let's talk! 09:48, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

ZVL Leiden

You removed the page of ZVL Leiden? may I ask why? It's about a dutch female sportsteam, competing in national and international competition, with players competing in the national team. It's not a company and ZVL is also mentioned on other pages at wiki Grasyerba (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

@Grasyerba:- Technically, I've no right to remove/delete any pages on Misplaced Pages. Perhaps I just tagged the page and someone else with tools found it appropriate. See, WP:CSD#A7 criteria of speedy deletion. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 08:51, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
@Anupmehra May I ask why you tagged the page? Why was in inappropriate? Grasyerba (talk) 07:00, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Because WP:CSD (more specific, WP:CSD#A7). Anupmehra -Let's talk! 10:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

I am thankful to you for suggesting me about demographic data as well citing Census of India Official website. I will improve with the suggested suggestions. Again Thanks and help me in becoming a good eminent wikipedian like you and keep on guiding me, even on minutest details.Rajsector3 (talk) 17:36, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

@Rajsector3: You're welcome. Feel free to {{ping}} me or leave me a message anytime you find yourself stuck on Misplaced Pages. Happy editing! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:43, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
I am obliged for your quick response. Please see my recent edits of Budhpur etc. and show me the correct way of mentioning demographic data and giving its reference.Rajsector3 (talk) 18:06, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
@Rajsector3:- I've made a change, see diff. link. You can simply copy-paste that format to your all settlement related articles with data changed. Wait! I'm making it more easier, "PPPP" is the subject and "XXXX" is the respective data.

As of 2011 India census, PPPPP had a population of XXXXXX in XXXXX households. Males constitute XX% of the population and females XX%. PPPPP has an average literacy rate of XX%, lower than the national average of 74%: male literacy is XX%, and female literacy is XX%. In PPPPP, XX% of the population is under 6 years of age.

Hope, it does help! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:21, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Got the pattern. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajsector3 (talkcontribs) 18:28, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Sir, I am unable to quick % of the data as you have done recently.Rajsector3 (talk) 18:47, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
@Rajsector3:- Please do not say, you do not have a calculator or a mobile phone with inbuilt calculator. Calculate it! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 18:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Ok, now it is clear, I thought that there is something which gives automatic response of the total demographic data. Manual % method will do, I will keep in my mind. Rajsector3 (talk) 19:01, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Dominican college of Racine

I did *not* consider it ready for a move to mainspace. I was still in the middle of editing it. I didn't think I needed to put an underconstruction on things in my own userspace!Naraht (talk) 19:36, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

@Naraht: Well, you created it in articles main space not in your user space, at Naraht/DCR. It was an inappropriate title reading the contents of the article, therefore I moved it to Dominican college of Racine. Perhaps you wanted to create in your sandbox! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 19:39, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Crap, was it Naraht/DCR rather than User:Naraht/DCR? Sorry about that. But based on other articles it should be Dominican College of Racine, with a capital C. I'll move it from there. Again, sorry for blowing up.Naraht (talk) 20:07, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Ah, it is okay, you really don't need to apologize for anything. Happy editing! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 21:51, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Sorry about blowing up, my fault.

Naraht (talk) 21:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Fscores why my page deleted?

Hi, my page http://en.wikipedia.org/Fscores deleted. I dont understand. Please help me. http://fscores.com is my site and i can verify it. ] (talk) 12:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello Rashad mirzeyev- Your article was about a website, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject (see, WP:WEBSITE). It is deleted under WP:CSD#A7 criteria of speedy deletion. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 12:50, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Your Edit request on Mufaddal Saifuddin

Hi,

I would like you to continue with your edit request which the other two users were not able to contest. They are clearly pushing POV AND also have COI Summichum (talk) 14:50, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For Bohra articles Summichum (talk) 14:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)