Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:49, 10 April 2014

Welcome!

Welcome to Misplaced Pages, Silvio1973! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and have been editing Misplaced Pages for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Misplaced Pages:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Marek.69 15:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: Some comments

Yes, posting comments to Talk:History of Croatia is fine. --Joy (talk) 14:19, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Your changes in Zadar article...

...are not written in good faith. It's based on selective sources and interpretation. It represents extreme politics of the Italian irredentists. No need for that. 78.0.152.65 (talk) 11:54, 1 December 2011 (UTC) Example: you wrote: "Andrea Schiavone, known in today's Croatia with the name of Andrija Medulić", as you don't know that "Schiavone" means - a Croat!78.0.152.65 (talk) 11:59, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Fist, you should log. In principle I do not answer to anonymous users. Also I think you should read about wikipedia code of conduct before posting again a comment of that kind, or your user ID could be blocked. To enter in the matter of your concern. Being qualified of irredentism is inappropriate and injustified. I do not consider that Italy has any right of claim for Zadar and or anywhere else in Dalmatia or Istria. Italy started a war and los it. It is a logical consequence to lose land. What I do not uderstand are the efforts made by modern Croatian storiography to change the history of people that lived in territories that today are in the border of modern Croatia. Concern the etymology of Schiavone I know where it comes form and it means "Slav",because it was from Dalmatia. But Damatia at that time was not Croatia, was the Republic of Venice. --Silvio1973 (talk) 17:40, 3 December 2011 (UTC) Your Italian educational system as such is very problematic concerning Dalmatia and its population in history. They don't teach you the real stuff, you have distorted paradigm abaout it. Example - you use Austrian censi from the middle 19th century but you obviously dont't know that these censi were not like modern ones, it was not based on ethnicity as modern censi are, it was based on "language spoken in public life" which cannot be equalised with ethnicity in this case since official language in Dalmatia was Italian, proclaimed by Italian administration with a fake document. Dalmatia was a part of Venetian Republic, but it was not populated by Venetians or Italians, neither it was part of Italy. But all of this was already said and resolved in Zadar talk page. You are just starting problems from the beginning. 83.131.73.39 (talk) 14:53, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Giorgio da Sebenico

I noticed you talked about Niccolo Fiorentino, so I thought you'd like to have a look at Talk:Giorgio da Sebenico. We have an Italian user there who insists that his proper name was Giorgio Orsini, but has not been able to provide a proper source to verify this. Either way the issue of most common name looks to favor the more geographic name for the main title, but it would be good to verify if there's any real merit to this argument. --Joy (talk) 10:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

On my books of Art they are reported as being the same person. I gave a look to the talk on Talk:Giorgio da Sebenico (honestly disappointing, I wonder if these users mind really something about art) and I must confess that it's a true mess. Also, it is simply not serious that 80% of the article is about the dispute on the name and only 20% about his masterpieces. And everywhere in the article there are translation in the two languages of names and places... honestly the article should be written again from scrap. It should be an article on art and it is looks indeed as a street fight. What some users should understand is that in the XIV century parents did not go to the Town Hall to register their children! Only people with noble origins were keen in transmitting the family name to their children. Most of them were called "Name" + From (da) "somewhere". Concerning Giorgio Orsini (Alias Giorgio da Sebenico) this name was given to the artist when he was already dead. My proposal is to report in the text (briefly) this fact but to use for the rest of the article the name Giorgio da Sebenico. Side comment : in Italy it is quite known as Orsini. --Silvio1973 (talk) 14:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, that basically confirms what I suspected to be the case. I also don't really like the fact that I contributed to an expansion of a name debate that is already overblown and has undue weight. Hopefully a person interested in art will come along and offset this with actual art content. --Joy (talk) 13:18, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Giorgio da Sebenico, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Gothic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Third opinion response

Hello there. I'm in response of a request for a third opinion. I am currently reviewing the talk page of the disputed page and should come up with a response in the near future. Whenaxis (talk) 22:34, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit war

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly.

Hi. This is Whenaxis. I filed an edit war filing on your behalf for both you and Zenanarh for your edits on Zadar and Luciano. You can see the application here: . Hope all gets resolved - or unfortunately arbitration will be the next step. Yours truly, Whenaxis about talk contribs 23:45, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

This is a good one. I have filed an application for edit war against Zenanarh. However, I will accept the judgement of any arbitration. And I hope this will show the road to follow in the future. It is not possible that any modification concerning the history of Dalmatia has to become every time a kind of war. --Silvio1973 (talk) 18:13, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

• Because the edit war has seemed to have calmed down, I have decided not to issue a block in this case, but this is a clear warning that Edit warring and/or violation of the three revert rule are not allowed and will result in a future block if continued. -- DQ (t) (e) 23:37, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

DeltaQuad, Surely they have calmed down. I moved away from the dispute and the current versions of the article those convenient for Zenanarh (he was the last one to modify!). Next time I'll ask directly for a 3rd opinion without getting in such discussions. You can go trough the talk and see how much I tried to find a consensus and what was Zenanarh's reaction. You should also see how much disputed are the article about Dalmatia and its history to understand that there is a real problem of POV's about the content of those articles. --Silvio1973 (talk) 15:36, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello again

After my decision, I looked back to your contributions and Zenanarh's contributions. And I thought everything was over, then I saw your edits for Luciano Laurana and Schiavone, and you guys are still disputing.

So I decided to help you guys make a decision by requesting for comments from the larger community. I will follow the dispute in the following days, if you need anymore help, please leave a message on my talk page. Sincerely, Whenaxis talk contribs 00:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

RFC/U discussion concerning you (Silvio1973)

Hello, Silvio1973. Please be aware that a user conduct request for comment has been filed concerning your conduct on Misplaced Pages. The RFC entry is located at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Silvio1973 and Zenanarh, where you may want to participate. Whenaxis about talk contribs 00:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Cost of electricity by source, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012

An thread that concerns you has been posted on WP:ANI. See Personal attacks and incivility by User:Zenanarh. Regards -- Director (talk) 14:29, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Giorgio da Sebenico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cathedral of St. James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Hey

Hi Silvio1973. It's Whenaxis again. I would just like to follow up with my previous mediation and I would like to see if there are any remaining issues that have been on your mind. Any questions regarding what the next step should be or anything else, I am happy to help you with your journey on Misplaced Pages. Please leave a message on my talk page on anything I can do to assist. Thanks, Whenaxis about | talk 20:58, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Nevado de Cachi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cachi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Request for arbitration

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Dalmatia and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration;
• Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide.

Thanks, Whenaxis talk · contribs | DR goes to Wikimania! 01:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Zadar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

I will revert all your corrections later

I do not understand the comment that you placed on my talk page regarding the Zadar article: I will revert all your corrections later. My corrections were just that, corrections, they didn't change the content. There is some really poor writing in that article, and it is not properly sourced. I didn't find anything on the talk page that would suggest that correcting spelling or grammar would be improper, or fixing a redlink. Could you clarify your comment for me please? I did notice the warning regarding violations of Misplaced Pages policy, is that what you mean by: There's a lot of discussion going on Zadar right now.? Reading the talk page there was a decision six weeks age (12 January 2012) by administrator Whenaxis, is there still a problem? --Bejnar (talk) 20:07, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Citation

One of the things that might help citation in the Zadar article is use of the Template:Cite in its various formats: Cite news, Cite web, Cite book.

Also it is sufficient when linking to a page in a book on Google Books to limit the url to the book id and page number. Thus:

http://books.google.it/books?id=kMXURN7sxh4C&printsec=frontcover

provides the same display as:

http://books.google.it/books?id=kMXURN7sxh4C&printsec=frontcover&dq=italians+of+dalmatia&hl=it&sa=X&ei=HMIGT5X7BsGe-wbi86C5AQ&ved=0CC8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=italians%20of%20dalmatia&f=false

--Bejnar (talk) 04:06, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. When you recently edited Rasac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quechua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Improvements to Rasac

Hi, Silvio1973, I just wanted to stop by and say that your improvements to the Rasac article were exactly what I thought was needed when I placed that tag on it. Well done! - Jorgath (talk) 12:16, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

RE: Italians of Crimea

Hey, I responded to you on my talk page instead of here to keep the continuity of the conversation. --ddima (talk) 23:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Giovanni Cernogoraz

I wouldn't say the information you removed is of "no importance" - I did not add it to prove a particular point, but to provide additional background on his employment situation, especially given the fact that the article will become a DYK entry, and the hook is precisely about his job.

By the same criterion, it could be said that the information you entered is also of no importance, and in fact it was removed, and then restored. I have no problem with it, so let's not split hairs, I like the article the way it was, with both of these facts inside for the benefit of the reader. GregorB (talk) 11:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Dalmatia / Bay of Kotor

Please defend your position by showing a few more reliable sources that prove your assertion that the Bay is notably described as Dalmatia. If you just keep reverting, regardless of whom you are reverting:

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you continue with the behaviour on Dalmatia, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.

--Joy (talk) 07:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Joy, I have reverted user Nemambrata because I do not find normal that someone modifies the article without being really involved before in the discussion. --Silvio1973 (talk) 07:32, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

I see you have already been notified and warned regarding WP:ARBCOM. Another POV removal of WP:SET results (from a reference intended to show the prevalence of a term) will be instantly reported on the relevant noticeboard, and will be presented as part of your pattern of pro-Italian tendentious editing on this project (as previously noted by Joy). The relevant policies are WP:NO PERSONAL ATTACKS, WP:VANDALISM, WP:EDIT WAR, and WP:TENDENTIOUS EDITING. regards. -- Director (talk) 11:41, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

What about WP:CANVASSING? That's what you have done trough the the Talk page of Dalmatia. However Direktor, I think you are an expert in the matter of being blocked. At least this is what appears going trough your Talk page.--Silvio1973 (talk) 11:52, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Please read the policy before you accuse others of a breach. Thank you. -- Director (talk) 12:00, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Consistent usage of the WP:COMMONNAME and WP:PRIMARY

This is an informational post regarding Misplaced Pages policy and guidelines. I wish to make certain you are informed on this subject.

• The title of the article is "House of Gundulić". And "Gundulić" is manifestly the WP:COMMONNAME. As such, that term should be used consistently in the article. Rather than two or three terms being used interchangeably.
• Misplaced Pages determines the most common name primarily through research in secondary sources (see WP:SECONDARY). Misplaced Pages articles are not written, and terminology is not determined according to the "original" or "official" names of the subject.
• Usage of WP:PRIMARY sources, such as official documents - is very restricted.

In short: go to secondary sources, and (for the purposes at hand) completely forget about "original" or "official" names. Again, thank you. -- Director (talk) 18:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

What are you talking about?! Where did I call you an "irredentist"? I did no such thing. You called me "arrogant" and "obsessed" for simply following policy, and you referred to my contributions as "crap". But I did NOT call you an "irredentist" or "fascist" or whatever else you're on about here. This is outright slanderous. -- Director (talk) 19:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement

There is new thread on arbitration enforcement forum that might be interesting to you - http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#DIREKTOR Nemambrata (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Italianization". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 3 December 2012.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 15:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Italianization, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, User:TransporterMan (talk) 17:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Talkback

ww2censor (talk) 23:21, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walter Bonatti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cerro Grande (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walter Bonatti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BMC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walter Bonatti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prealps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Warning

Please see activities of editor IvanOS at articles of cities and municipalities in Istria where he removes from infobox labels in Italian language (Buje, Labin, Novigrad, Istria County...). It all started after my comment WP Croatia#Minority languages where I raised question about double standards towards different minority languages in Croatia-all in hope to improve position of all other minority languages. However, editors IvanOS and Sokac121 (they usually support Croatian nationalist POV), decided to insist that there should not be a minority languages in infoboxes and then this incident happened. It would be good if you can contribute on debate and maybe even invite other interested editors from other projects? I think that these two editors no longer represent major attitude at WP Croatia but interest of third parties who have experience with this issues may be useful just in case debate draws huge interest at WP Croatia. With their knowledge they can make a strong arguments and keep discussion civilized (I speak from previous experience with this topic). You can also warn editor IvanOS on inappropriateness of his actions so that there stay a trace because he already has inappropriate activities in case of other languages as you can see on his talk page.--MirkoS18 (talk) 02:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mutilated victory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Treaty of London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:56, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Dubrovnik/Ragusa

Greetings. Here is a possible book/academic expert who can deal with linguistic issues around Romance/Slavic language naming and usage in the Adriatic area. Good luck.

A state of deference : Ragusa/Dubrovnik in the medieval centuries

Stuard, Susan Mosher Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press, c1992 Tapered (talk) 10:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walter Bonatti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sakai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:31, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Healthcare in Croatia

Once a PROD has been removed you cannot re-add it, please take to WP:AFD. GiantSnowman 17:57, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Re the esodo..

Hello Sig. Silvio, just posting to remind you of my respectful request that you provide a brief quote or two in support of your edits on Istrian Exodus (in light of previous misunderstandings re the explicit position of the relevant sources). The quote you did provide - cuts off right where it might have had something to say on the issue at hand. The quote need not be extensive in any way, but please make sure its relevant. As things are, experience warns me not to take the matter as sourced.. Ciao & regards -- Director (talk) 15:41, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Istrian exodus". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot  19:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

A minor change to DRN

Hi there, you're getting this message as you are involved in a case at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard which is currently open. Today DRN has undergone a big move resulting in individual cases on subpages as opposed to all the content on one page. This is to inform you that your case is now back on the DRN board and you will be able to 'watch' the subpage it's located on. Thanks, Cabe6403 13:17, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jirishanca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Riccardo Cassin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] in 1954, but ], the chief expedition leader for the ]), preferred to leave Cassin home. According to Cassin himself:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:12, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you continue with the behaviour on Istrian exodus, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. I hate writing reports.. -- Director (talk) 11:50, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Dear Direktor, I am not goint to revert your edit. I am going to add disputed matter exactly as you are doing (pardon exactly as you did first).

Cassin

Thanks for your additions to this article. Would you please give a source for these additions or they may be removed? Regards, Ericoides (talk) 13:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Done. --Silvio1973 (talk) 09:56, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Re:

In casi simili è meglio se mi mandi una mail direttamente (la trovi su meta) piuttosto che via Misplaced Pages, c'è il rischio che come ora finisca per non vederla affatto! --Vituzzu (talk) 20:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Istrian exodus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Croatia at http://www.dzs.hr/Eng/censuses/census2011/results/htm/E01_01_04/e01_01_04_zup18.html --> released data --> census 2011 --> tables --> population by ethnicity by towns/municipalities --> (scroll down) County of Istria</ref>
• such as ] and ], then Yugoslav Minister for Foreign Affairs), were sent to Istria in the years 1945-1946 to organise anti-Italian propaganda to induce the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:14, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BSE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring on Zadar

Your recent editing history at Zadar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- Marek.69 18:21, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Reply from IJA

I've not insulted you, I don't think I've said anything to you before. I fully support your right to join in and participate in any discussion on Misplaced Pages. Misplaced Pages is a free encyclopaedia which anyone can edit therefore you're more than welcome and edit any page and participate in any discussion. Regards IJA (talk) 17:20, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Artesonraju may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• time on the 24 June 1969 by K. Schreckenbach, H. Saler and K. Sussmilch el 24 de junio de 1969). A large number (and perhaps exproportionate when compared to the actual relative difficulty of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aeolian Wall Lizard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Salina

Strombolicchio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Salina

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

De Facto and Indirect Recognitions

Thanks Silvio1973 for your suggestion. I tried to rephrase as follows:
In July 2013, ECtHR stated that a de facto recognition of the acts of Northern Cyprus may be rendered necessary for practical purposes thereby the adoption of civil, administrative or criminal law measures, and their application by its authorities or enforcement within that territory, may be regarded as having a legal basis in domestic law for the purposes of the Convention".(ref1) The beginning of direct flights to Northern Cyprus by the other states is regarded as indirect recognition of Northern Cyprus as an independent state.(ref2)

ref1: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-122907 ECHR Decision]02.07.2013, App. nos. 9130/09 and 9143/09; Pavlides v. Turkey; Georgakis v. Turkey
ref2: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sann2029/FCO_Paper%20by%20Dr%20Stefan%20Talmon.pdf Stefan Talmon (Assoc. Prof., Oxford)]"Air Traffic with Non-Recognised States: the Case of Northern Cyprus", p.30Alexyflemming (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Sorry Silvio, but I just saw this message. This discussion should take place at the article talkpage not on your talk, but I will reply here at this stage and then we should move this discussion where it properly belongs, i.e. the article talkpage. In any case, the proposed edits are unacceptable. The first source is WP:PRIMARY and it does not say that the de facto recognition has happened but rather that it may be rendered necessary to be de facto recognised. Therefore it has not happened yet and it is not official. It is just speculation at this point. Per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:PRIMARY it is an unacceptable addition. The second paper covering the flights is not published in a peer-reviewed journal and it is not a reliable source. It is just the opinion of the author which may or may not be valid. Therefore these are not "De Facto and Indirect Recognitions " but mere speculation about "De Facto and Indirect Recognitions " and should not be included in the article. Δρ.Κ.  14:27, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

HR 5171

Hello Silvio. It looks like you started a new article at HR 5171. Since a requested move has just closed, that page has been replaced with the former contents of V766 Centauri. If you still have the material you added previously, you might try to insert it in HR 5171 if you believe it is relevant. You can see your old material at this link if you need to copy it. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:26, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring notice

Your recent editing history at Russia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. EvergreenFir (talk) 15:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)