Misplaced Pages

Talk:Brady Campaign: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:26, 17 April 2014 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,807 editsm Signing comment by 50.0.107.211 - "Criticisms section looks a bit thin.: new section"← Previous edit Revision as of 22:47, 17 April 2014 edit undoMike Searson (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers28,704 edits Criticisms section looks a bit thin.Next edit →
Line 55: Line 55:


When someone has the time, they should make it a little more thorough. Sparse information isn't supposed to be one of Misplaced Pages's hallmarks. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> When someone has the time, they should make it a little more thorough. Sparse information isn't supposed to be one of Misplaced Pages's hallmarks. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 21:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:These groups have paid shills who operate on wiki spreading their lies, hate and racism. They will just revert you and move to have you blocked, comrade.--] - ] 22:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:47, 17 April 2014

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brady Campaign article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconFirearms
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconOrganizations Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconUnited States
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brady Campaign article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months 

To-do list for Brady Campaign: edit·history·watch·refresh· Updated 2010-06-30


There are no active tasks for this page
  • Restructure so that the current "Criticism" section is incorporated into the rest of the article.
  • Ensure that all points are supported by reliable sources.
  • Consider whether to report organization's response to recent court decision.

Criticisms

Shouldn't opposition to Civil Rights be added under criticisms? It would be if it was a page on any other group in opposition to Civil Rights of a group of people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.235.27.119 (talk) 02:38, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

If you can find reliable sources (newspapers, magazines, news organizations) that plainly discuss opposition to civil rights, then it can be added to the article. Likewise for anything else that you wish to add to the article. Otherwise, it is not allowable according to Misplaced Pages policies. Also, please be mindful of WP:SYNTH. - MrX 02:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Misplaced Pages. This, however, doesn't necessaryily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.opposingviews.com/i/brady-campaign-uses-lethal-logic-on-dc-v-heller-anniversary
    Triggered by \bopposingviews\.com\b on the global blacklist
  • http://www.opposingviews.com/p/brady-campaign-explains-difference-between-automatic-weapons
    Triggered by \bopposingviews\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II Online 15:53, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Gonna do some clean-up on this thing

Gonna do some clean-up on this article... since it's been tagged for clean-up for nearly six years now (since October 2008). Lightbreather (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

I've removed the clean-up tag because I think I've cleaned it up pretty darn well. I updated a lot of citations to WP:CS1 standards; updated some of the URLs; and added archive URLs and dates where needed. The article could still use some development and updating, which I'll probably continue to do, but I thought I'd stop for a minute to follow-up on the clean-up notice. Lightbreather (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Criticisms section looks a bit thin.

Considering the sheer number of Americans that dislike these people, the criticisms section looks rather thin.

When someone has the time, they should make it a little more thorough. Sparse information isn't supposed to be one of Misplaced Pages's hallmarks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.0.107.211 (talk) 21:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

These groups have paid shills who operate on wiki spreading their lies, hate and racism. They will just revert you and move to have you blocked, comrade.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 22:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Categories: