Misplaced Pages

Academic elitism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:41, 13 May 2014 editDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,904 edits →Feminist Academia: original research, synthesis, and in general unencyclopedic writing← Previous edit Revision as of 02:42, 13 May 2014 edit undoDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,904 edits →Description: what sowell says here doesn't seem to pertain directly to academic elitismNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


== Description == == Description ==

Economist ]'s '']'' claims that intellectuals have an undeserved "]" and are thus unfairly permitted to speak outside their expertise. In Sowell's estimation, academics respected for their contributions in their particular discipline often become known to the general public by commenting on policy issues outside that discipline.


Critics of academic elitism{{specify|date=August 2013}} argue that highly educated people tend to form an isolated social group whose views tend to be over represented among ], ]s, and other members of the ] who often draw their salary and funding from taxpayers. Economist Dan Klein shows that the worldwide top-35 economics departments pull 76 percent of their faculty from their own graduates. He argues that the academic culture is pyramidal, not ], and resembles a closed and genteel social circle. Meanwhile, he claims, academia draws on resources from taxpayers, foundations, endowments, and tuition payers, and it judges the social service delivered.{{clarify|date=August 2013}} The result is a self-organizing and self-validating circle.<ref> Critics of academic elitism{{specify|date=August 2013}} argue that highly educated people tend to form an isolated social group whose views tend to be over represented among ], ]s, and other members of the ] who often draw their salary and funding from taxpayers. Economist Dan Klein shows that the worldwide top-35 economics departments pull 76 percent of their faculty from their own graduates. He argues that the academic culture is pyramidal, not ], and resembles a closed and genteel social circle. Meanwhile, he claims, academia draws on resources from taxpayers, foundations, endowments, and tuition payers, and it judges the social service delivered.{{clarify|date=August 2013}} The result is a self-organizing and self-validating circle.<ref>
Line 25: Line 23:
</ref> </ref>
Deeming scholarly academic discourse as the only means with which to engage in a topic has various implications in a variety of fields of study. Deeming scholarly academic discourse as the only means with which to engage in a topic has various implications in a variety of fields of study.

==See also== ==See also==
*] *]

Revision as of 02:42, 13 May 2014

This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. Please help improve it by replacing them with more appropriate citations to reliable, independent, third-party sources. (August 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Academic elitism is the criticism that academia or academics are prone to elitism. The term "ivory tower" often carries with it an implicit critique of academic elitism.

Description

Critics of academic elitism argue that highly educated people tend to form an isolated social group whose views tend to be over represented among journalists, professors, and other members of the intelligentsia who often draw their salary and funding from taxpayers. Economist Dan Klein shows that the worldwide top-35 economics departments pull 76 percent of their faculty from their own graduates. He argues that the academic culture is pyramidal, not polycentric, and resembles a closed and genteel social circle. Meanwhile, he claims, academia draws on resources from taxpayers, foundations, endowments, and tuition payers, and it judges the social service delivered. The result is a self-organizing and self-validating circle.

Another criticism is that universities tend more to pseudo-intellectualism than intellectualism per se; for example, academicians may be charged with over-complicating problems and expressing them in obscure language (e.g., the Sokal affair, obscurantism).

Academic elitism suggests that in highly competitive academic environments only those individuals who have engaged in scholarship are deemed to have anything worthwhile to say, or do. It suggests that individuals who have not engaged in such scholarship are cranks. Steven Zhang of the Cornell Daily Sun has described the graduates of elite schools, especially those in the Ivy League, as having a "smug sense of success" because "It makes us believe gaining entrance into the Ivy League is an accomplishment unto itself." Deeming scholarly academic discourse as the only means with which to engage in a topic has various implications in a variety of fields of study.

See also

References

  1. Klein, Daniel B. (2005). "The Ph.D. Circle in Academic Economics". Econ Journal Watch. 2 (1): 133–148. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  2. http://cornellsun.com/node/46778

Further reading

  • Trow, Martin, "Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Education," Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, 1973 .
  • Papers about Academic elitism
Categories: