| Revision as of 19:55, 18 May 2014 editJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 edits →"vandalism": new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:11, 18 May 2014 edit undoRenamed user 51g7z61hz5af2azs6k6 (talk | contribs)6,460 edits →MEDRS and Original ResearchNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| I undid your reversion and left you a note on the Isotretinoin Talk page. ] (]) 23:44, 17 May 2014 (UTC) | I undid your reversion and left you a note on the Isotretinoin Talk page. ] (]) 23:44, 17 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| You seriously need to read ] before throwing around any more accusations of vandalism. Your behavior is a violation of ], and is compounded by your unilateral reversions while refusing to engage on the Talk page. This sort of edit warring is likely to get you blocked if you are not more careful. ] (]) 21:11, 18 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == "vandalism" == | == "vandalism" == | ||
Revision as of 21:11, 18 May 2014
wiki-etiquette
please read WP:BRD and follow it. thanks! Jytdog (talk) 03:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
MEDRS and Original Research
I undid your reversion and left you a note on the Isotretinoin Talk page. Formerly 98 (talk) 23:44, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
You seriously need to read WP:MEDRS before throwing around any more accusations of vandalism. Your behavior is a violation of WP:GF, and is compounded by your unilateral reversions while refusing to engage on the Talk page. This sort of edit warring is likely to get you blocked if you are not more careful. Formerly 98 (talk) 21:11, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
"vandalism"
Accusing someone of "vandalism" is a very, very strong charge on Misplaced Pages. Please do not use it when there is a good faith difference of opinion, as you did in this dif. Accusing others of vandalism in such situations is in itself a violation of our rules - please be more careful going forward. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 19:55, 18 May 2014 (UTC)