| Revision as of 12:55, 21 May 2014 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,915 edits Added {{tilde}} note.← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:52, 21 May 2014 edit undoJoeSperrazza (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,945 edits →May 2013: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
| Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 12:55, 21 May 2014 (UTC) | Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 12:55, 21 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == May 2013 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. {{Break}}You have made the same revert 6 times, and then made another set of reverts 1 time<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ~~ | |||
Revision as of 13:52, 21 May 2014
Welcome!
|
April 2014
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Atama頭 21:26, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Yagmurlukorfez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I wasn't violeted three revert rule. I just twice reverted. it doesn't mean to an edit war. here and here diffs: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Celts&action=history (talk) 21:38, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are not blocked for violating WP:3RR. You are blocked for edit warring. --jpgordon 00:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Just an FYI, even though you removed warnings from your talk page here we can still read them in your page history (anyone can). As you can see here, Tiptoety stated, "Consider this your only chance. Any further battleground behavior/edit warring will result in a block." This block is following up on that warning. At the article Celts, you'd posted on the talk page asking about their connection or status in regards to Indo-European peoples. If you'd waited for a reply (which came pretty quickly) and discussed the issue on the talk page instead of reinserting the "fact" tag you wouldn't be blocked. Your block will end soon, just remember this after your block is lifted. -- Atama頭 13:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- I didn't hide anything, If you imply this. I remember tiptoety's warning don't worry but I think that(celts article) wasn't an "edit war." That user (whom reported me)fallowing me and when I edit something he quicly revert. Clearly, he is obsessed with me and keep attacking. I think we've got a serious problem than "blocking." You must be warn him too. Yagmurlukorfez (talk) 13:36, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- You're allowed to remove warnings, our policy at WP:BLANKING allows for it. But your unblock request above showed surprise that you were blocked despite another administrator warning you that this exact situation would happen if you continued to edit-war or otherwise engaged in battleground behavior (reverting other editors instead of discussing matters with them). To me, that meant that either you didn't take the time to read the warning before deleting it, or you deleted it in the hope that other people would not know that the warning occurred. In either case I thought it would explain the block better to remind you that we (all editors, not just administrators) can look at your page history here even if you delete information, and that this block didn't come out of nowhere. If you had no history of this behavior in the recent past I would have just given you a warning, but you engaged in this behavior knowing that it could lead to a block.
- Just to clarify, an edit war as defined at the policy consists of "
a series of back-and-forth reverts
", which is exactly what happened there. Even two reverts is an edit war (if an editor makes a single revert on a page it's almost never considered an edit war). I myself try to restrict myself to a single revert on a page against a particular editor, or on a particular topic, and I try to never revert more than once in a 24 hour period on a page unless it falls under these exemptions. If I ever get in a situation where I feel I have to revert someone more than once I instead try to get them to talk about the reason behind our differences, and that usually works. (When it doesn't work is when you may need to ask someone else to help you out.)
- Just to clarify, an edit war as defined at the policy consists of "
- I considered just giving a warning to both yourself and Zyma since it takes two to edit war. I checked to see if your edit-warring history was only a conflict with Zyma, but I see you also warring with an IP on this article. I will, however, remind Zyma not to engage in edit-wars on the ANI board, because it is worth reminding them that it is unacceptable behavior. -- Atama頭 15:45, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Now you're targeting me atama. That IP blamed to me a "Turkish Nationalist" (I suppose this is a "personel attack"?) as you can see. And that because of he/she reverted my edit. He is might be a troll or sockpuppet, who knows?... I'am not keep going this nonsense argue. Blocking is fine, but you must be neutral and civil. Yagmurlukorfez (talk) 16:07, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- I always try to be neutral, I did after all warn Zyma on the ANI board (it only seemed fair to). If I've been uncivil, please show me where my language was personally insulting, hyperbolic, or aggressive. I always try to treat people with respect and to deal with issue in a calm fashion and if I haven't done that I'd like to know where I made a mistake. I'm not going to assume that the IP was a troll or sockpuppet, I always assume the best of other editors until given reason to suspect otherwise and you should do the same, it's a fundamental principle of Misplaced Pages. -- Atama頭 17:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Selam
aynen öyle:) sen yapabilirtmisin, numarasini yazmaya calisiyorum! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehmeett21 (talk • contribs) 13:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
turkic people kaynakta yaziyor 112 numarali onu karasuk culturnun yanina yazmak istiyorum tsk ederim:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehmeett21 (talk • contribs) 13:55, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
saol kardes sence kaynak iyimidi?:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehmeett21 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Selam :)
Misplaced Pages'da yeni User olduğunu görüyorum. Sana karşı kabalık yapıldığını gördüm izlediğim sayfaların birinde. Herhangi user yorumlarda kabalık yaptığında burda şikayet ede bilirsin. Böylece kaba Userlardan kurtulmuş oluruz. Bests, Ali-al-Bakuvi (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:55, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2013
Your recent editing history at Talk:Kyrgyz people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
You have made the same revert 6 times, and then made another set of reverts 1 time ~~