Revision as of 10:27, 28 May 2014

Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled until January 15, 2025 at 17:55 UTC, to prevent sock puppets of blocked or banned users from editing it. See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can submit an edit request, discuss changes on the talk page, request unprotection, log in, or create an account.

• Computing
• Entertainment
• Humanities
• Language
• Mathematics
• Science
• Miscellaneous
• Archives

• WP:RD/M

Main page: Help searching Misplaced Pages

How can I get my question answered?

• Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
• Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
• Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
• Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
• Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
• Note:
  • We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
  • We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
  • We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
  • We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.

How do I answer a question?

Main page: Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Guidelines

• The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.

• Teahouse
• Help desk
• Village pump
• Help manual

May 23

Executions FYI

Update to an earlier discussion. Back on May 1 there was a question about lethal injections as an execution method in the US. Today the governor of Tennessee signed legislation which will allow using the electric chair in that state, if the drugs used for lethal injection become unavailable. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 03:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

The Long Arm

In the black & white thriller film of the above name, it explains how the exact time and place that a newspaper was printed, can anyone remind me of those details? I do remember that the location of the printing machine was indicated by three white dots in a broken under line which showed that the printer was in Cardiff, that the location of those dots under a specific letter in the "Daily Mail" heading showed the day of printing, but under which letter I cannot remember, and that the content of the 'Stop Press' (The Fudge) showed what time that edition was printed, I think too that there was some means by which of the Welsh newspaper distributors couold be identified, but again, I forget that detail also..85.211.129.35 (talk) 04:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

TOEFL and GRE

Are the two tests (TOEFL and GRE) both required simultaneously for admissions into universities, or is it sufficient if an applicant writes either one of them? I'm planning to apply to McGill University for my PhD and I can't figure out if I need to write both tests or just one. 117.194.243.80 (talk) 06:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

The best way to get an answer is to contact the university's admissions office. Often the requirements vary by program, so you might also be able to find the admissions requirements on the program's website. Katie R (talk) 11:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Also be aware that in general you would be much better off going to Europe to do a PhD, better pay, MUCH shorter course, no need to do random classes as well, better quality on the whole etc etc etc. Just saying! 131.251.254.110 (talk) 12:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

The TOEFL and GRE are different tests that aim to measure different qualities, so it would be surprising if a university treated them as interchangeable. The TOEFL aims to measure English-language ability, whereas the GRE aims to measure general academic readiness. As to whether it would be better to attend a European university, the OP may be taking into account the greater ease of permanent immigration to Canada than to most EU countries for people with academic qualifications and the bridge that a Canadian university would offer to Canadian residence. Marco polo (talk) 15:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Stakeholders of Misplaced Pages

Where do I find comprehensive information about the stakeholders of Misplaced Pages? Is there a stakeholder analysis for Misplaced Pages?

Moreover, I would be interested in communication strategies for each stakeholder. ITKALDKESJDNF (talk) 11:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

It depends on what exactly you mean by "stakeholder", but you're probably looking for the Wikimedia Foundation. Rojomoke (talk) 12:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

"Stakeholders" such as they are defined in this article https://en.wikipedia.org/Stakeholder_(corporate)

I have been searching for hours in Wikimedia, Metawiki and Misplaced Pages, but I have not found anything comprehensive. However, I firmly believe that Wikimedia must have a comprehensive stakeholder analysis and communication strategy. ITKALDKESJDNF (talk) 13:07, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Well, you can create a list of stakeholders easily enough by reading the Wikimedia FAC page. I would say the stake holders are (a) the Wikimedia foundation, its Executive Director, and its Board of Trustees; (b) local Wikimedia chapters; (c) the wider Misplaced Pages community of volunteers, active editors and benefactors; (d) Misplaced Pages readers. Gandalf61 (talk) 14:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

The Wikimedia Foundation has multiple projects, mainly Misplaced Pages, but there are others, such as Wiktionary, Wikitravel, Wikisource, and more! The Wikimedia Foundation runs those projects, and is a non-profit itself. Non profits don't have any stakeholders. Stakeholders usually get the surplus revenues from the (for-profit) company they own in the form of dividends, and a non-profit uses the surplus revenue to fulfill its goals. Therefore, your question only applies if Wikimedia decided to become a for-profit organization. Hope that answered your question! 123chess456 (talk) 14:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

"Non profits don't have any stakeholders" - you seem to be using a different definition of stakeholder. In our article, stakeholders are defined as "those groups without whose support the organization would cease to exist". Their relationship with the organisation does not have to be economic or financial. Your definition of stakeholder seems to be closer to "investor" or "owner". Gandalf61 (talk) 14:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Agreed, 123chess is using a restricted definition that doesn't cover modern usage. The NSF, NRC, and EPA use a definition of stakeholder similar to our article's, some discussion of the term in this EPA pub here . In that usage, WP readers and editors (e.g. everyone seeing this!) are absolutely stakeholders in the Misplaced Pages project. We may not be that important individually, but as a class we hold a lot of the stake! SemanticMantis (talk) 15:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

I suspect he confused stakeholders and shareholders. In modern project management, doing a stakeholder analysis and developing a communication strategy to gain (as much as possible) of their support is part of the project initiation. Of course, no-one is forced to apply these principles, but it's not unreasonable to expect a professionally run organisation to do this. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 22:27, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Animation of what will happen if humans disappear

Some years ago I saw a short, thought-provoking animation online that showed what the filmmaker thought would happen if humans suddenly disappeared. I can't seem to find it again, although I've found bad ones, long ones and ones that aren't animated. Any ideas? --Dweller (talk) 13:08, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

There are some examples under Human extinction, subsection "In popular culture". Maybe it's one of those? ---Sluzzelin talk 13:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

I can only think of the Life After People TV show - of which there are many episodes. It does an excellent job of showing how the world would change over the following days to millennia without us. SteveBaker (talk) 20:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I found them, but what I'm thinking of is a single, short, animated video. --Dweller (talk) 20:16, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Computer animation, traditional animation, or something else, like time-lapse photography of places abandoned by people ? StuRat (talk) 20:30, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Definitely one of the first two, probably the first. --Dweller (talk) 20:54, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

May 24

Name my tool

They call it a root cutter, but I use it to break ice (or I slide the blade under the ice to separate it from the ground). I've called it a Mutt, but I think that may be a trademark. Is there a general term for such a tool, when used for ice removal ? Do we have an article on it ? StuRat (talk) 02:34, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

I have heard it called an ice spade. Although in this illustration it looks more like the "chisel bar".Rmhermen (talk) 04:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Isn't a spade normally curved, like a shovel ? StuRat (talk) 13:41, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Searching for "ice breaker" seems to work. --jpgordon 23:43, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

An "ice chopper" is a tool with a long handle. You can break up sidewalk or driveway ice with it. It's shaped a little differently from your "root cutter", though. An ice chopper has a shorter, wider blade. OttawaAC (talk) 00:07, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Any connection between "cauldron" and "seething pot" that is mentioned in the King James Bible?

In the book of Leviticus, in the Bible, it speaks a lot about the "caul" during animal sacrifices which was burnt on the altar, but there was also the "seething pot" where the priests would use flesh hooks to draw out their portion of meat. The writer of the article on CAULDRONS did a great job with the etymology, but I was just curious if there was something in the Hebrew or Greek that might not have been listed. Just curious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whatdoidonext (talk • contribs) 05:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

The Wycliffe Bible used "caudron" (closer the the French "chaud") in 1382, with the Coverdale version of 1535 using the modern spelling. Job 41:20 in the King James Bible indicates that "seething pot" and "caldron" were the same. The earliest recorded use of caul (1327) recorded by the OED was spelt "calle", with the modern spelling not being used until the late 1600s. It seems that the coincidence of modern spellings is just a preference of modern spellers. Dbfirs 09:19, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

The word caul is in the KJV verse "And he took all the fat that was upon the inwards i.e. intestines , and the caul above the liver, and the two kidneys, and their fat, and Moses burned it upon the altar." Leviticus 8:16, also 8:25. The OP is incorrect to connect "caul" with "cauldron" derived from Latin caldārium "hot bath". Modern bibles translate "caul above the liver" as "the (long) lobe of the liver" (NI, NL, ES, NAS) or "the appendage on the liver" (IS, NW) or "the protruding lobe of the liver" (NET) or "the net of the liver" (DARBY) or "the cover of the liver" (WE) or "the redundance above the liver" (YL). Commentaries on the Old Testament by Keil & Delitzsch describes this portion of the liver as "the liver-net, or stomach-net, ...which commences at the division between the right and left lobes of the liver, and stretches on the one side across the stomach, and on the other side to the region of the kidneys...This smaller net is delicate, but not so fat as the larger net; though it still forms part of the fat portions." It is defined in Pentateuch with Rashi's Commentary as "the protecting wall (membrane) over the liver." 84.209.89.214 (talk) 00:10, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

what foods are good to take when you are on a diet?

?Zonex shrestha (talk) 07:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC)zx

That will depend on the type of diet you wish to follow. Please see our article on dieting, which has links to the different types of diet, and come back here if you have further questions.--Shantavira| 08:24, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

But do be aware of the philosophical dilemma of wanting to lose weight by putting something in your mouth. HiLo48 (talk) 08:43, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Well, you want to limit the number of calories, and calories come from 4 sources: protein, carbohydrates, consisting of simple carbs (sugars) and complex carbs (starches), fats (consisting of saturated, unsaturated, and trans fats), and alcohol. Of those, some are more important to proper health than others. Trans fats are terribly unhealthy, so eliminating those is a no-brainer. Saturated fats are also somewhat unhealthy, so try to limit those. Unsaturated fats are quite healthy, and without them you can expect dry skin and other problems, so I wouldn't cut back on those, unless you are getting more than you need. (Unsaturated fats tend to be liquid, while saturated and trans fats tend to be solid.)

Similarly, protein is necessary for proper health. There are disagreements over how much each person needs, but something like 50 grams a day seems reasonable. If you don't get enough protein, you may suffer from "brain fog".

Carbs and alcohol are good places to cut calories. Simple carbs (sugars) and alcohol, which is rapidly converted to sugar, can both cause a glucose spike and then a glucose crash, so limiting both of those is a good idea, but don't substitute in artificial sweeteners, as they are both unhealthy and seem to cause weight gain. Complex carbs (starches) tend to provide energy over the long term, so are better, but many people on a western diet still get way too many. In particular, you might want to avoid white flour, and stick with whole grains, or other sources of healthy carbs, like sweet potatoes (not white potatoes). The goal here is foods with a low glycemic index. I suggest the web site nutritiondata.com for info on the glycemic index and other facts about foods.

It's also a good idea to reduce sodium intake, as salt is both unhealthy and can cause you to retain water, which results in weight gain.

Meanwhile, you don't want to reduce your intake of other nutrients, like vitamins, minerals, fiber, and phytonutrients. Some people who have an incredibly unhealthy diet manage to get enough of those just due to the quantity they eat, and then, say after gastric bypass surgery, still eat the same crap, but in much reduced quantities. Thus they lose weight but suffer from health problems due to a lack of nutrients. So, as you lower your total food intake, it's important to move to healthier foods, too.

Now for an example. Let's say you would normally have a bacon double cheeseburger with cheese fries and gravy (poutine) with soda to drink. That's high in saturated fats (and perhaps trans fats), sodium, white flour carbs, and calories. Instead, have a salmon fillet with salt-free spices, broccoli with lemon juice sprinkled on it, a baked sweet potato with butter or trans-fat free margarine, cinnamon, and (if you need a sweetener) some dark brown sugar. To drink, try an herbal tea without sweeteners, if you can handle it, or perhaps some honey, if you need it.

Unfortunately, your average fast food restaurant won't be able to provide a meal like that, but you can still do a bit better there. Some have grilled chicken, which is better than a burger, and you can ask for fries unsalted, and add ketchup if that's too plain for you, or better yet ask for apple slices, a yogurt parfait, etc. You can also get juice or milk at most places. This certainly isn't as healthy as the salmon meal, but is a lot better than what we started with. StuRat (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

• We cannot provide professional advice, seek a registered or licensed dietician or nutrtitionist, no advice from strangers on the internet:

General Disclaimer: If you need specific advice (for example, medical, legal, financial or risk management) please seek a professional who is licensed or knowledgeable in that area.

American eating habits.

I know I am going to take some abuse for this but hey-ho, here goes. We recently invited some USA Americans for dinner. We are in the UK. They were all above mid 20's, well educated from University Level and upwards, and they were all above middle income earners. So we gave them traditional steak pie with a puff pastry lid plus vegetables, and we all set about eating. Now, we have been to America many times and know about the fork switching technique but have never watched so many Americans simultaneously eating a traditional steak pie dinner. It was frankly quite disgusting. All of them used only the fork in their right hand to both cut their food into smaller pieces including the pie crust, and then proceeded to lift the food to their mouths using the fork as a spoon. Their dinner knives were never touched. To prevent the food falling from the fork before it reached their mouths they bent their heads down close to their plates and almost threw the food into their mouths, sometimes missing. And when they did score a direct hit they proceeded to munch and chew and talk, all at the same time. I am a traditional knife and fork man and can adequately manage to cut the food with my knife held in my Right Hand, then spear some food of a small size and lift it to my mouth on the tines of the fork with my Left Hand without spilling any. And I never talk with my mouth full at the same time. I eat with my mouth closed and only speak when my mouth is empty, and I can hold my head upright so I can see and address my guests and give each of them my focused attention which I consider, and was taught, to be respectful of one's guests. I daren't describe the performance of them eating trifle, it was sickening and frankly put me off my own food. My dog has better eating habits and in his case, I can forgive him for sticking his mouth into his bowl. We were going to invite them for a meal in our favourite restaurant where we are well known to the staff and other diners, but decided against that course of action for fear of causing alarm and embarrassment. So what was going on there I ask. Is that behaviour normal in the USA? We were in Canada last year and don't recall seeing anything like that at table. Only asking in order to prepare myself for our next USA Vacation. 94.174.140.161 (talk) 13:21, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Talking with your mouth full is considered bad manners in the US, too. However, I believe the knife is only used here for things which actually require a knife, like steak. Anything which can be cut with a fork or spoon is likely to be. To me, this is better, as it doesn't dirty a knife if you don't need one, so that's less washing up and better for the environment. I don't follow why it would be necessary to lower your face to the food, but this is considered poor manners in the US, too. You just seem to have some rather slovenly friends who happen to be from the US. One possible difference is that few in the US would receive any formal etiquette training, basically the parents are expected to provide that. I suspect that some in the UK do have formal schooling in etiquette (certainly those who train as butlers do). StuRat (talk) 13:32, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Leaning over the plate compensates for spillage, although bringing one's face very close to the plate is kind of odd. I am curious why the OP was so focused on the guests instead of just eating. Jerry Seinfeld once said that eating in general looks fairly gross, so that's why we do it together - we can focus on our own consumption instead of others'. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 13:40, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

One suggestion, take them out for casual finger food, like pizza, where their eating differences will be less apparent. If you want them to experience British culture, then maybe fish and chips, wrapped in a newspaper page. StuRat (talk) 13:43, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Some of us eat even those types of foods with knife and fork. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 14:01, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Just to note that fish and chips is no longer served in old newspaper in the UK. The practice was banned some years ago.--Shantavira| 14:27, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Maybe that relates to this comment by Mike Royko: "No self-respecting fish would be wrapped in a Rupert Murdoch newspaper." ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 14:58, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Too bad, as I get the impression that for the class of people who eats that regularly, that may well have been their only exposure to a newspaper. :-) StuRat (talk) 16:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Eating habits vary from country to country. Barring the apparent embellishments ("sometimes missing"), this is basically how I eat. I'm Canadian, but in my experience Americans eat the same way as me for the most part. It's only disgusting because it is deemed so culturally. Point being, yes, this is what you can expect should you travel to Canada or the US. Mingmingla (talk) 17:17, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

• But there's also a huge difference based mainly on what I'll call class and parental example. I know plenty of people who don't have the slightest idea how to behave in a restaurant, from how to use their napkin, call the waiter, order, or tip. Just this week there was the story of a family who got a discount from their bill for well-behaved kids. One of my earliest memories is of an elderly couple coming up to my parents at Bookbinders restaurant in Philly and complimenting us on how well we children were behaved--and I couldn't understand why, although I do now. There are people who hold conversations across the street, or who sound like they are doing so when they stand next to each other. The Loud Family sketch from Saturday Night Live covered this. There was Shenehneh (sp?) from Martin (TV), there were the ghetto girls from Mad TV, there's the teenage student from the Katherine Tate show. Am I bovvered? None of this is typically or particularly American. PS, if the food you're serving drips before it gets to the mouth, set a tablespoon. μηδείς (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

The biggest issue I can think of is: where were they from? Income and education doesn't matter quite as much for certain manners. I'm from the Southeastern United States (or "the South"), and I'd've been fussed at by my mom for most of what you described, and would get (at best) a glare from both my folks for talking with my mouth full of food (even if it was just the family). I can easily find friends and coworkers descended from slaves and sharecroppers who would tell you their mothers would spank them in front of God and all of earth for eating that way, bourgeoisie who wouldn't see what the problem is, and vice versa. That said, despite my region having (a honestly undeserved) reputation for being well mannered (and "friendly," I can't stand that reputation), I could head over to the nearest restaurant and easily find people eating like pigs and some eating in a more refined manner than I do. Same restaurant, even.

I know a lot of Americans have a pretty strong dichotomy between "formal" and "informal," instead of measuring between the two as a matter of degree. Since it wasn't black tie, they might've figured they should (not merely could) eat as they do when they're with just family.

It's actually not as bad as it used to be. I remember reading one travel journal from nearly 200 years ago where one traveler (either British or French, it's been years and I was only half-heartedly skimming) had mixed feelings of admiration and disgust at how a group of American strangers of varying social classes completely dropped all differences if you put them at a table with food. Admiration at the beauty of egalitarianism and universal fraternity, but disgust (even by my standards) at folks alternating between fighting over the last sausage while asking for unwanted food off of strangers' plates. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:11, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

If one wishes to attract the stares of astonished foreigners, one should eat one's peas using the back (convex side) of the fork, as all well-brought-up English folk have been taught from early childhood. To be fair, the Americans that I've dined with did so in a civilised fashion, except for the disinclination to use a knife and fork in harmony, a skill which some Canadians seem to have retained. Alansplodge (talk) 18:30, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

"I eat my peas with honey / I've done it all my life / It does taste kind of funny / But it keeps them on my knife." ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 20:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Hmm. I've never heard of this strange pea custom. How is that managed, exactly? Do you smash the peas to get them to stick? Evan  20:00, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

It's something kids do that might qualify as "playing with their food". You balance as many peas as you can on the side of the blade, and see if you can get them into your mouth that way. The inevitable result is peas rolling onto the floor. The mushier the peas are, the easier it is to keep them on the blade. StuRat (talk) 04:21, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

I was talking about the upside-down fork thing. I've found various references online that identify this as "the British way" of eating peas, but haven't seen any pictures or an explanation of how it's done. Evan  04:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

In my experience, you either eat a very small number of peas at a time, balanced on the tines, or you mashing them down onto it. Personally, I find ketchup makes the whole thing a lot easier, which is when everyone quotes that old honey rhyme like they're the knights who say ni. Or you can otherwise lift the peas with other things on your fork, so they're held in place with a piece of meat or potato or something. The balancing act isn't quite as hard as you'd think, since it's easier to keep the tines completely flat with little arm movement when the fork is that way up. It does slow you down, though. Sometimes, you just have to pretend you don't have a knife and shift the fork to your right hand (leaving the left empty), at which point it is mysteriously acceptable and normal to use your fork as a shovel. 86.146.28.105 (talk) 21:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

I'd forgive the Americans for having no idea how to manage the U.K. meal (speaking as a Canadian). Watching foreigners trying to eat poutine, KFC, pizza, etc., with a knife and fork has provided occasional entertainment for me. But also worth noting is that "fine dining" is not that common in the U.S., while eating out at fast food places or diners is much more common. Different level of service, different expectations for table manners. 99.245.253.81 (talk) 23:11, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

As American children in München in the early '60s, we were amused and amazed by weird eating habits of the Germans. When introduced to hamburgers, they would eat them with knife and fork. Amazing! Point being that arbitrary dining etiquette varies from culture to culture. Americans who consider themselves mannerly would never even consider slurping noodles Japanese style, much less burping in satisfaction to praise the cook (Saudi Arabia, I seem to recall.) We will not hesitate, however, to eat with our left hand should we please, a quite disgusting thing to do if raised a certain way. If you're going to live in international style, it behooves you to (a) learn what might disgust those you're dining with; and (b) learn to suppress your own opinions about what's disgusting. Because it's really completely arbitrary; the person eating with their mouth full might have completely different social cues. --jpgordon 23:40, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

JP Gordon. It is always normal and acceptable to eat with your mouth full. LoL. 94.174.140.161 (talk) 09:20, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Good braino there! --jpgordon 15:09, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

But never eat on an empty stomach. -- Jack of Oz 20:12, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Eating on a full stomach would require that you place your plate on top of a haggis, which would be one way to get a balanced meal, I suppose. StuRat (talk) 20:36, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

It is just a matter of culture. We're on a spectrum here. I'm British - I used to make frequent business trips to the Netherlands (I worked for Philips Research) - and one time we had lunch in the company staff restaurant. I chose a simple cheese sandwich (sliced bread - thin slices of cheese, some kind of dressing) and sat down to eat with my (Dutch) co-workers. I proceeded to pick up the sandwich and bite into it exactly as polite British *and* American people do. As I ate, I slowly noticed quite a few people looking at me - and several other people with sandwiches carefully cutting and eating them with a knife and fork. I felt like a barbarian. So should we make value judgements? I think not!

At the opposite end of the scale, there are cultures where almost everything is eaten with fingers.

I live in the US, and my (American) wife says that the (British) way that I eat seems very strange. She describes it as like in Medieval times when people would eat with just a hunting knife. She tells me that having both hands on the table and using the knife throughout the meal is considered a breach of formal etiquette. You cut up your food with knife in dominant hand - then switch the fork over and place the (now unneeded) non-dominant hand into your lap. Having both hands on the table is a faux-pas on a scale with leaning your elbows on the table in British dining etiquette. So the way I eat is considered somewhat barbaric on this side of the atlantic. My wife reports that she did feel uncomfortable with her eating style while we in the UK and worried about how people would perceive her - but decided that it would be physically difficult to use the fork with her non-dominant hand - so she didn't attempt to adapt.

So both sides think the other has bad manners - and both of us are out-done by the Dutch.

I haven't noticed a particular difference with leaning over the table - but I do notice that the Americans use their hands for a wider range of foods than British people do.

17:18, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh, I don't agree with your wife at all. Generally, only children get their meat cut up into bits before eating. What you do is, when you want a bite of meat, you hold the fork in your left hand and cut off a bit with your right. Then you put the knife down, transfer the fork to your right hand, and take it up to your mouth. For the next bite, you transfer the fork back, pick up the knife again, and repeat.

I'm afraid any shortcut to this procedure, including cutting up in advance, makes it look like you're too much in a hurry to eat. --Trovatore (talk) 19:34, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

But why the switching of the hands? Having cut a piece of meat off with the knife, and having held it down with the fork, why not just bring the fork containing the cut piece, in your left hand, up to your mouth? Or was I missing some irony there? -- Jack of Oz 20:12, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

As I said, it makes it look like you're in too much of a hurry. I think it's inefficient-by-design. No irony. --Trovatore (talk) 20:14, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Having spent my entire life around people who do it the way I described, I have never once thought the thought you mention. Now, cutting the next piece while you're still busy chewing the first one may well make it look like you're in a hurry, but merely using the left hand to bring food to your mouth on a fork never produces that effect. I guess it all depends on one's upbringing and what one has been led to expect. I don't think there are any universal rights or wrongs with eating. -- Jack of Oz 20:46, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

I thought it was understood that I meant, in an American cultural context, that's how it looks. --Trovatore (talk) 20:48, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

I fully understand that. If I were visiting an American home and ate my way while my hosts all ate the way you describe, then yes, the difference would be apparent, and the thought "What's his hurry?" may well enter some of their minds. But then, I've seen many American movies where people were eating meals, and while the methods vary, they have often included using the fork in the left hand and the knife in the right and nobody ever switches hands. That says to me that there's no one universal American way of eating, and Americans, being cosmopolitan types, should expect to see all manner of variations and not jump to conclusions about the manners or lack thereof of eaters with whom they come into contact. -- Jack of Oz 21:03, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Deeper (but still "original") research: My wife called her grandmother - and verified that 90 years ago, she had been taught to eat with fork in right hand. The issue of whether to cut up all the food before transferring the fork over - or just some of it - depends on the social context. In more formal meals, one would cut up more of the food in advance in order that the non-dominant hand could be placed in the lap for more of the meal. She also mentioned that her grandfather (so we're now 4 generations back in US history) was a first generation Irish immigrant. She clearly recalls him scolding her if her left hand wasn't placed primly in her lap while eating...thus indicating that the US way of eating is least 90 years old. So now we have to wonder why someone who presumably learned eating etiquette as a child in Ireland would be such a strong advocate of fork-in-dominant-hand eating. I kinda doubt this is an Irish invention from at least 150 years ago (although it might be) - probably more that immigrants are often the most aggressive about blending into mainstream society by adopting their customs and etiquette.

Another point of interest is that my ex-wife is French - and they eat the English way - so this isn't just a UK-only thing.

The "slowing down the eating" argument is an interesting and compelling motive for eating the US way - but is flatly contradicted by the American tendency to eat more food with their fingers than we Brits do - which is undoubtedly fast. Also, when my wife and I eat, it's not the case that one of us always finishes first. So as a practical matter, the "slowing down" or "efficiency" arguments seem pretty specious to me. Eating can always be profitably slowed down by good conversation if there is something good going on - and if not, then why not be able to shovel the food down quickly so you don't miss that movie you wanted to see? SteveBaker (talk) 15:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

The Dutch seem rather silly, to me, if they object to eating a sandwich with your hands. It is a British invention, after all, and the Earl of Sandwich specifically invented it so he could eat without utensils. So, if the Dutch wish to eat one with utensils or stuff it into a blender to make a drink out of it, that's their business, but they have no business ostracizing others for eating it as it was originally designed to be eaten. StuRat (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Now, now. Do you eat couscous with your right hand (with your fingers)? I don't, normally, but as a guest of my friend's relatives in Morocco I did (no cutlery was provided, the technique is not that difficult). Nevertheless, I'd expect and accept weird stares if I ate couscous with my fingers in most places in Europe or North America, for example. ---Sluzzelin talk 21:26, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Just try eating a Sri Lankan curry and rice and other trimmings with your fingers. Sound gross? Well, that's their way, but they also provide Western utensils for those who can't quite bring themselves to go the traditional way. They recognise that most other cultures have a low opinion of eating with one's fingers, and that early childhood training goes deep and is hard to overcome. -- Jack of Oz 04:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Was couscous specifically designed so it could be eaten with the hands without getting them messy, like the sandwich was ? StuRat (talk) 13:19, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Hard to say for sure - but as a point of comparison, having stickier food is common in cultures where they eat with chopsticks. Trying to eat modern 'long grain' rice with chopsticks is a pain - but the stickier kind of rice that's eaten throughout East-Asia clumps really well and is easy to eat with those utensils. Indian food is always served with a variety of flat breads (Nans, popadoms, etc). That enables one to use the bread as a scooping utensil - which makes eating with hands alone much easier. Same deal with tortillas in south and central American cuisine. Clearly, in all three of those cases, the food has adapted to the eating style rather than vice-versa. Heck even modern "fast food" is adapted to the desire to deliver it without utensils - so burgers and hotdogs come in buns, potato is made into french-fries or tater tots. So it wouldn't surprise me if couscous is indeed made the way it is to make it easier to grab a mouthful of it between thumb and two fingers...it's the way humans adapt their diet to the eating utensils available. SteveBaker (talk) 15:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Europe has a history of using bread as a plate too, a history older than John Montagu, and I'm wondering whether the (nameless) person who signed at 17:18, 25 May 2014, had his Dutch meal squeezed between two slices of bread, or whether it was actually an open sandwich, which exists in many traditions independently of the two-sliced sandwich. It is sometimes customary to eat them with knife and fork. In the Netherlands, for example, there are uitsmijters (Dutch Misplaced Pages has an article on uitsmijter linking to English WP's article on Strammer Max). These are not eaten by hand and they weren't invented in the United Kingdom. ---Sluzzelin talk 21:33, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Certainly - it had a name too: A Trencher was a piece of bread that was used as we'd use a plate - and it certainly dates back to at least Medieval times. So the tradition of eating foods with bread was nothing new when the Earl of Sandwich came up with his idea. We might call that an "open sandwich" in modern parlance - but Sandwiches' innovation was in using TWO slices of bread to make it easier to pick up and eat without the filling falling out. That's what makes it difficult to track the history. We find plenty of references in Shakespeare of people eating foods with bread - but no indication of whether this was a trencher or a sandwich.

My favorite thing about the Earl of Sandwich is that there is (of course) an actual town called "Sandwich" - that he was the Earl of. Nearby, there is another tiny village called "Ham" (see image at right!). SteveBaker (talk) 02:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

They should open a branch of the Mayo Clinic there. StuRat (talk) 04:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

He also lent his name to Hawaii for a time. Is there any other country or place named or formerly named after a person who was also the eponym of a type of food? -- Jack of Oz 22:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Don't forget the South Sandwich Islands. Meanwhile, eat your cheese danish while reading up on Dan (king). StuRat (talk) 22:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Odd coincidence: For fans of the "Car Talk" radio show on NPR, I bet you'd have a shot at winning this weeks' "Puzzler" competition:

http://www.cartalk.com/content/puzzlers

SteveBaker (talk) 18:59, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes, by all means, judge the eating habits of 314 million people based on your sample size of two people you invited over for dinner. Nice troll. Viriditas (talk) 22:42, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

"All Indians walk single file. At least, the two I saw did." --jpgordon 00:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Where was Gautam Buddha born?

?Zonex shrestha (talk) 15:30, 24 May 2014 (UTC)zzx

According to Gautama Buddha, it was in the Himalayan foothill. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 16:35, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Only one foothill? I thought he was born in all of them, in order to exhibit bilocation at an early age and make people sit up and take notice.  :) -- Jack of Oz 20:00, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

FoothillS. So sorry. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 20:25, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

It is thought that he was born in Nepal. Is there a reason that people on this board don't answer direct questions? This is the third question I've seen here that lacks an actual answer. Viriditas (talk) 22:39, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Baseball Bugs answered the question in a perfectly acceptable way. The OP did not ask for the name of the country, but thank you for adding to the answer. It would have been more correct to say the area was then called Shakya, and is now part of Nepal. It would also been more gracious not to criticise the earlier, correct answer. -- Jack of Oz 04:38, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

I Wanna know the recipe to make french fries?

Zonex shrestha (talk) 15:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm sure you can find plenty of traditional recipes online, but I will assume you want a healthier version, since you previously expressed an interest in healthier foods and in losing weight. First, there are two approaches to forming the shapes:

1) Cut the potato into slices, possibly with the skin left on (steak fries). (Keeping the skin on is healthier.)

2) Mash the potatoes, then extrude them. The mashed version allows you to add spices to the interior, but don't add salt there, as you will need more salt to get the same flavor than if it's on the surface. Also, the extrusion process requires special equipment.

Then there's the choice of cooking methods. Deep frying is the traditional method, but baking is far healthier.

Also, there's the choice of potato. Sweet potato fries are healthier.

Fries may also be dipped in batter before they are cooked. For healthier fries, skip this step.

Finally, there's some seasoning to put on top. For white potatoes, salt is the most common (though unhealthy), while ketchup is a bit healthier. For sweet potatoes, on the other hand, butter, cinnamon and sugar would work. This can be made into a dip, making it less messy to eat and allowing everyone to get the amount they want.

In any case, thicker fries are healthier, as it decreases the surface area, so allows less fat, salt, etc., to be absorbed.

So, for the healthiest version, remove the "eyes", slice sweet potatoes up thickly, with the skins on, bake them, and serve them with a dip made from melted butter or trans-fat free (no partially hydrogenated vegetable oils) margarine, dark brown sugar, and cinnamon. StuRat (talk) 16:21, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

The salt substitutes I've had the best experience with are Cumin (love this stuff on meats especially), Rosemary (love this stuff on fries), black pepper, and (in sweeter dishes) Jamaican Allspice (not other "Allspices" though). It's not always a 1 to 1 ratio (you'll want to use less cumin, pepper, and allspice), and you have to learn which goes with what dish (though you can usually tell by smelling the spice and the dish before mixing), but the flavor you get from those spices should satisfy your urge for salty flavors. I would not recommend using them all at the same time, though, except maybe with certain kinds of curries or chilies. For white potatoes, I know that Rosemary is great, and cannot imagine how cumin or black pepper would go wrong. For sweet potatoes, Jamaican Allspice tastes like a combination of cinnamon, cloves, and nutmug (hence "all spice"), but not as overly sweet as most powdered cinnamons nor as strong as cloves.

As for a dipping sauce, using an unflavored strained yogurt (often sold as "Greek Yogurt" these days) as a base for the sauce instead of sour creme or mayo will help some (though they sometimes have more sugar to compensate for the reduced fat). This is something you'll probably have to experiment with, but start with about three-quarters the yogurt you'd use for the dip, and add the minimum amount of each spice, sauce, or whatever to get what you're looking for. I had a dipping sauce with some Sriracha sauce, cumin, and a few drops of Worcestershire sauce the other day that was great. Spicy mustard (regular mustard will lose all its flavor when mixed) and Balsamic vinegar are also good (my favorite salad dressing is just those two sauces and some olive oil). Of course, if you're substituting the spices for salt, you may not need a dipping sauce. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:01, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Those salt substitutes sound far better than potassium chloride, which is dreadful stuff. Capsaicin is also a good substitute for salt, although most hot sauces that contain it also have lots of sodium, so you may need to buy your own peppers (I use red pepper flakes). Not sure why you would want a substitute for cinnamon, though, as it's tasty, inexpensive, and healthy. StuRat (talk) 20:04, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Take potatoes, peel them, cut into matchstick sized pieces, fry in hot oil. That's all. --TammyMoet (talk) 19:54, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

All hail the Queen of Conciseness. -- Jack of Oz 19:58, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

You really can't beat Alton Brown who, other than pronouncing greasy as greazy (as you'll see if you watch), always knows what he's talking about.--108.54.17.14 (talk) 20:58, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

That's not so unusual. There's an old cliché, pronounced "Take it easy, greazy." ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 21:06, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

• Back when Jim McGreevy was the married gay but not gay married mayor of Woodbridge Mall, NJ, I learned how to cook T.G.I.F.riesday. On monday you would clean, slice and blanch the potatoes in 1/4" strips along their length. You brought them to a very low boil in a 50 gal aluminum vat, and added ice chips if they boiled too quickly. This drew out the starch. You emptied the hot fries into a colander, discarding the starchy soup, and transfere the fried into what looked like kitchen-plastic trash can half-way filled with ice chips and let the combination sit over night while more starch leaked out. The process of heating, cooling and draining continued ad nauseam. (They employed a professional Prussian ex-Margravess for that purpose). Finally the fries were crunchy, rather than cakey enough to fry, for which they rounded up some illegal immigrants looking for work along U.S. Route 1 that ran through the middle of town. A surprisingly large proportion of this story except the Prussians (they were Cantonese) was true.) 06:46, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Medeis (talk • contribs)

Is there any relation between aging and eating foods cooked(grilled, fried, roasted etc.) in high temperature?

Although free radicals are connected to aging. But on the other hand, I've heard foods cooked in high heat would yield harmful chemicals like acrylamide.

According to Frequently asked questions - acrylamide in food :

"Acrylamide is known to cause cancer in animals. Also, certain doses of acrylamide are toxic to the nervous system of both animals and humans."

According to - Food 'cancer chemical' reaction identified :

"Boiling potatoes should create less acrylamide than roasting them"

"in baking bread, the centre of the bread does not reach 100°C. You would only really get acrylamide in the crusts - but they're the tastiest part." (the browned crusts should be due to Maillard reaction if I understand correctly)

According to Maillard reaction :

"The Maillard reaction also occurs in the human body. It is a step in the formation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs)"

According to advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) :

"These harmful compounds (AGEs) can affect nearly every type of cell and molecule in the body and are thought to be one factor in aging and in some age-related chronic diseases"

Per references above, it seems eating foods cooked in high heat will speed up aging and get you look older faster, but I'm not quite sure. Besides, eating grilled, fried or roasted foods is very usual in some western countries. I'd like to know how these coocking styles affect body in aging... and to what degree ... - Justin545 (talk) 18:31, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

I suspect that only bread with a burnt crust contains the harmful compounds, as browning is just due to the Maillard reaction. Can anyone else verify or disprove this ?

Also, free radicals can be countered with antioxidants, so how harmful they are will depend on how many of those you get. StuRat (talk) 14:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

May 25

County officials

Who is ahead or above the clark county, Washington code enforcement officer, ? Who do they have to answer to ? Or who is their boss? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salinia50 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

That would be Martin Snell. Marco polo (talk) 00:35, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

How is Kawasaki ninja 250 different from its new version with twin headlight?

Zonex shrestha (talk) 03:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Re Wiki Post of Amanda Todd

How is banning guns in U.S. going to work, exactly?

May 26

I am not making this up (famous last words)

I had read somewhere that the world's first modern environmental movement was in Japan, during the Meiji period, regarding preservation of the wilderness of Hokkaido, however I can find no reference for this, has anyone else heard this?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:46, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Information about early conservation in Japan at Local Environmental Movements - A Comparative History of US and Japanese Invironmental Movements. Alansplodge (talk) 11:04, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

I doubt if the Meiji period was the first instance of environmentalism. Establishment of large parks, like Central Park, may also qualify, as might implementation of clean water and sewage systems, such as the Roman aqueducts. For that matter, when the first cave men decided not to just poop wherever they happened to be and set aside a place for that, this would qualify, too. StuRat (talk) 13:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

This was probably pre-human, but post arboreal.

But early environmental movements might be the creation of the New Forest in 1079, or even the estate formations of the previous millenia. Exactly what constitutes a "modern environmental movement" is something that would need to be defined before one could consider "first". All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:10, 26 May 2014 (UTC).

I believe that if you consider the legal preservation of the environmental system of a particular area as an end in itself, rather than for hunting, water catchment, grazing or other human activity, then the first example I can find is Yosemite National Park in 1864. The New Forest was created by a a brutal military tyrant expelling thousands of people from productive farmland so that he could chase deer about, which didn't really have the same lofty ideals. Alansplodge (talk) 17:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

OP specifically asked about the first instance of modern environmentalism, not the first instance. Come on, peeps. Viriditas (talk) 22:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Define modern and environmentalism. Every example thus given has been objected solely by the "no true Scotsman" defense. We have a case of shifting goalposts, which should be said were very ill-defined to start with. --Jayron32 02:39, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Saved pages

Where are my saved pages gone? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimi76 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Saved pages from what source using what tool? SteveBaker (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Renovation of the White House under Obama

I hardly find any updates update that project? What is the current status of the renovation? Is it on hold due to the GOP's objections or are the shovels still active? 112.198.79.49 (talk) 14:37, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

This report (from February 2013) says that a major two-year renovation programme is underway. --Viennese Waltz 14:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

May 27

Lethargy

My lethargy, though having enormous contacts and practical ideas, has making me unsuccessful in all areas namely, family life, financial and health. I have a name of good worker when I worked with various organisations. I need to know the obstacle in me and I want to remove it and be successful. Is it Procrastination? If so how to overcome it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijayakrishnam (talk • contribs) 10:31, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

If the lethargy is ruining your life, then you ought to consult a doctor -- it is possible that you are seriously depressed, or have some sort of illness. Looie496 (talk) 13:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

I second that. See a doctor. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 13:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Procrastination is the act of postponing, delaying or putting off, from Latin prō ("to") + crāstinus (“of tomorrow”), from crās (“tomorrow”). While procrastination is often associated with feelings of laziness and guilt, there is enough scope for normal people to procrastinate for rational reasons and/or as part of their coping strategy in complex situations for it not by itself to amount to a Mental disorder. 84.209.89.214 (talk) 14:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

You know very well that medical advice is prohibited here. You have no way to know what the OP's real issue is. Only a professional, in a face-to-face meeting, can provide possible answers to whatever might be ailing the OP. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 20:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

I agree with Baseball bugs here...but then we don't really apply our standards to the reference desk. We let editors get away with breaking Arb com sanctions and nothing happens so...give whatever advice you want. No one really cares that much...but be careful, you could also destroy someone's life by pretending to know what is wrong with Them.

We need to start putting our foot down on the reference desk and stick to policy. Otherwise this is just a secondary venue for editors to bypass our policies and guidelines.--Mark Miller (talk) 21:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Vijayakrishnam, you may benefit from the short book The War of Art. It talks about how to remove the obstacles you describe. Joe Rogan and many artists, writers, and celebrities swear by it. Good luck. Viriditas (talk) 22:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Reasons for granting or denying a motion for summary judgment

What percentage of motions for summary judgment are granted or denied for lack of jurisdiction, failure to state a claim, a contested issue of fact or some other reason? Raquel Baranow (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Oddly enough.....I had this information at one time but cannot, for the life of me, remember where I found it.--Mark Miller (talk) 21:49, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

It should be taught in law school. What are your chances of winning, is it a waste of time or the client's money? Is filing such motions like churning stocks to gain commissions? Raquel Baranow (talk) 03:28, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Is this what you wanted? Richard-of-Earth (talk) 08:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

May 28

• Pages automatically checked for accidental language links
• Misplaced Pages resources for researchers
• Misplaced Pages help forums
• Misplaced Pages reference desk