Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 02:48, 31 May 2014

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Intelligentguy89/Parshvanath college of engineering has been moved to Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Parshvanath college of engineering, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 01:51, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Parshvanath college of engineering.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! Callanecc (talk) 03:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello! Engineering Guy, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. Any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Parshvanath College of Engineering.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! Callanecc (talk) 06:09, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Callanecc (talk) 06:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of Indian engineering college rankings. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 11:12, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 11:12, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Categories

Please note that if a page already belongs to a category (like Category:Engineering colleges in Mumbai) it should not belong to its father category (Category:Engineering colleges in Maharashtra in this case). It would therefore be appreciated if you stop adding these, like you did here and here. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 07:56, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Banner of the Parshvanath College of Engineering.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Banner of the Parshvanath College of Engineering.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:GayRomeo login screenshot.png)

Thanks for uploading File:GayRomeo login screenshot.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. When you recently edited University of Mumbai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:ISRO official logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:ISRO official logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Banner (without logo) of the Parshvanath college of Engineering.png missing description details

• File:Banner (without logo) of the Parshvanath college of Engineering.png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

Your possible experience with graph apps

Hello User:Intelligentguy89, Nice new graph on "Misplaced Pages" page. It was so nice I was wondering if you might have any way to make this into a graph for the same Page:Misplaced Pages.

All rated articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low ??? Total FA 1,585 2,522 2,424 1,981 186 8,698 FL 180 702 773 695 100 2,450 A 372 684 790 581 92 2,519 GA 3,271 7,449 14,928 19,982 1,789 47,419 B 17,192 33,322 55,168 71,496 23,743 200,921 C 17,189 54,974 137,636 319,377 93,269 622,445 Start 18,567 93,170 419,932 1,653,856 416,260 2,601,785 Stub 4,236 31,312 277,242 2,813,998 760,073 3,886,861 List 4,951 17,485 54,868 204,018 81,998 363,320 Assessed 67,543 241,620 963,761 5,085,984 1,377,510 7,736,418 Unassessed 114 414 974 16,449 391,244 409,195 Total 67,657 242,034 964,735 5,102,433 1,768,754 8,145,613 About this table

Basically, the subsection on "Internal Quality Control" on the same Page:Misplaced Pages could really use some graphics of this table since the numbers by themselves looks a little stale. Could you try to think of a way to turn this into a graph of some kind? Only the first 8 rows and first 4 columns would be needed. Cheers. BillMoyers (talk) 17:24, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello User:Intelligentguy89, Nice graphs on "Misplaced Pages" showing up. There appears to be a "cut-off" issue over 500,000 count which you may already be looking at. There is a scale issue of "orders of magnitude" getting up to the max of 4.5 million. Also, there is a fifth column which appears unlabeled, what was intended there. BillMoyers (talk) 13:05, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello Intelligentguy, Just received your useful message. The graph labels are still being mis-located on the axis, my screen show all the axis labels above the column graphs, displaced directly above them. The graphs look very good, yet they are printed with displaced axis labels about three to four inches off. BillMoyers (talk) 14:21, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

GRE Psychology Test (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sensation

Indian Institutes of Technology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to GATE

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Good work!

Kind of funny--I was going to stop by and say thanks for the good work on all the standardized test edits over the past few weeks, and just noticed you thanked me for a few changes at Common Admissions Test yesterday. So, this isn't related to that. Those infobox updates are really helpful, so thanks for adding them! Transmissionelement (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

Yeah, I really thought there should be an infobox template for all the test- or examination-related articles. There wasn't any, so I created it:

Template: Infobox examination

I have added it in 12 examination articles so far, but there are many more that need to include it. Feel free to include the template in any more examination articles that you encounter.

--Sarthak Sharma 11:23, 30 December 2013 (UTC) (User:intelligentguy89)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mars One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oceana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Law School Admission Test, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Very similar delineations yet completely different colors question

Quality-wise distribution of over 4.375 million articles and lists on the English Misplaced Pages, as of 28th December 2013.

Hi Intelligentguy89 and I thought your new charts looked pretty good for quality-wise distribution on Misplaced Pages page. Only a very small question, as to why the color schemes are redone between the one chart and the bar chart right below it. They seem to be indexing the same material, with the same delineations, yet use an completely different color scheme? FelixRosch (talk) 22:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment on my Talk page. Your color choices are better than those in the numerical table. Actually, my question above was to ask why the colors in this quality-wise pie-chart did not match up with the bar-chart colors which you presented. The both look very high quality, yet use different color palettes for some reason. If you had a reason for this its all fine. What may be more interesting at this point is a new chart, if you can think of one, for this new table from Wikimedia on trends which you can connect to with this link: http://www.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/photo/29073061.cms FelixRosch (talk) 21:39, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back. The new color scheme looks quite good. I have been thinking to ask if you had ever started to do the "ancillary" form of the quality table which you had illustrated, namely, rather than using importance assessment on the x-axis, to instead see it with the quality assessments on the x-axis (A,B,C,etc.) This would be important for wikipedia statistics people who spend most of their time thinking about the WP:Featured_article_statistics and the WP:Good_article_statistics. Your version is very informative and i just wondered if you had also thought about the other one, since most people think in terms of quality first for some reason, and then importance next in order. FelixRosch (talk) 21:46, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering may have broken the syntax by modifying 9 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | '''Total''' || '''> 7''' || '''> 3''' || '''> 133''' || '''> 321''' || '''> 33''' || '''> 32''' || '''> 30''' || '''> 25''' || '''> 584''' ||

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | '''Total number of posts''' || '''> 7''' || '''> 3''' || '''> 148''' || '''> 321''' || '''> 87''' || '''> 32''' || '''> 30''' || '''> 25''' || '''> 653''' ||
• In the above table, ">" is the "greater than" sign. The exact number of posts in each discipline can not be known, as

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:09, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

I reverted your move to Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. Please see Talk:JAXA#Proposed move on 1 November 2013. It is already a controversial move. Cheers.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 09:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Casting aspersions

I would suggest that you publicly apologise to the three editors you've accused of WP:SOCK very, very quickly. The apology should be on that same article talk page. If not, I will open an ANI. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

I have merely pointed out an observation. The part that seems to be causing trouble to you is "By the way, the language, typing and presentation styles of User:Ohconfucius, User:Ms Sarah Welch and User:Iryna Harpy suggest that they are all one user who is resorting to WP:Sockpuppetry." I have used the word "suggest", and given my reason for it: language, typing and presentation of the 3 users. I have not said anything like "WP: Sockpuppetry is definitely at work here". I may be wrong, and if that is the case, then you can provide your own explanations, reasons and examples to counter my observation. If I am indeed wrong, then I will apologize. Though I do not think there is even any need to take this matter so seriously: it is not as if I have insulted or disrespected you or anyone else, in any way. --Sarthak Sharma (talk) 01:31, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

No, the part that is causing you trouble is that you do not even make such inferences on an article's talk page. Please read WP:SOCK properly (including how to handle matters if you suspect sockpuppetry). You are avoiding having to discuss the inclusion of content you want in the article by casting aspersions.

For me, personally, your allegation is amusing. Evidently, you're incapable of even checking user's special contributions in order to establish some sort of similarity in editing patterns. I'm suspect that User:Ohconfucius would be equally bemused. User:Ms Sarah Welch, however, is fairly much a newbie and may be intimidated or take affront at your inferences.

If you don't realise that you are violating WP:AGF in one of the worst ways possible, it is your problem. Even alluding to sockpuppetry is far more serious than you seem to believe. I will not be interacting with you on the relevant talk page until such a time as you issue a retraction and apology, and suggest to the other two contributors that they do the same. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

1. Misplaced Pages:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Statistics - Misplaced Pages, the 💕