Misplaced Pages

User talk:200.120.158.78: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:17, 4 June 2014 editVaulter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,662 edits →Comment: ANI notice← Previous edit Revision as of 15:39, 4 June 2014 edit undoPonyo (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators171,558 edits block noticeNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
edit summary is a personal attack. You were already blocked for this. Do it again and your next block will be considerably longer. - ] (]) 15:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC) edit summary is a personal attack. You were already blocked for this. Do it again and your next block will be considerably longer. - ] (]) 15:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
*Please see ]'''] <sup>]</sup>''' 15:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC) *Please see ]'''] <sup>]</sup>''' 15:17, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week''' for disruptive editing and personal attacks. You may have a point in the various disputes in which you have become involved, however if you are not capable of elucidating your arguments without making personal attacks such as , you will continue to be blocked. You don't have to agree with other editors, but you do need to be able to edit collaboratively. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the ] first. &nbsp;]<sup>]</sup> 15:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block -->

Revision as of 15:39, 4 June 2014

Comment

You don't want "best known" in any articles. You make a variety of arguments that shift with the challenges. "Unsourced". Here's a source. "Vague". Sharpen the wording. "But if I slice and dice that one source to leave out the Pink Floyd part..." No, that's immaterial. Rather than deciding what you want and trying to see what argument will stick, try working with the project. You won't always get things your way, but you'll get over it. We all do.

This edit summary is a personal attack. You were already blocked for this. Do it again and your next block will be considerably longer. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing and personal attacks. You may have a point in the various disputes in which you have become involved, however if you are not capable of elucidating your arguments without making personal attacks such as this edit summary, you will continue to be blocked. You don't have to agree with other editors, but you do need to be able to edit collaboratively. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jezebel'sPonyo 15:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)