| Revision as of 06:27, 3 June 2014 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,304,643 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:De728631/2014) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:37, 5 June 2014 edit undoUseitorloseit (talk | contribs)471 edits →Question: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| It's the most prominent noticeboard for urgent requests, and on this occasion the protection may be more harmful than the edits it is intended to prevent. Could you please remove the protection? ] (]) 22:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC) | It's the most prominent noticeboard for urgent requests, and on this occasion the protection may be more harmful than the edits it is intended to prevent. Could you please remove the protection? ] (]) 22:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :The protection was set to expire automatically after four hours which it did today at 00:51 UTC. I wouldn't have protected the ANI board for any extended period anyway. As to the harmfulness, this seems to have been a recurring event and the board is frequently protected for various reasons, so short inconveniences for IP editors and newly registered accounts are actually nothing new – if undesirable nonetheless. ] (]) 19:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC) | :The protection was set to expire automatically after four hours which it did today at 00:51 UTC. I wouldn't have protected the ANI board for any extended period anyway. As to the harmfulness, this seems to have been a recurring event and the board is frequently protected for various reasons, so short inconveniences for IP editors and newly registered accounts are actually nothing new – if undesirable nonetheless. ] (]) 19:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Question == | |||
| You closed a request I made at the AN board. The issue seemed to be the timing of the appeal. What is the appropriate time period to wait before raising such an appeal? ] (]) 21:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:37, 5 June 2014
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
 Archives |
|
2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Jonas Ödman, De728631.
Unfortunately Alanl has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
This is thinly disguised resume and the subject has doubtful notability.
To reply, leave a comment on Alanl's talk page.
Non-English titles in the Paenitentiale Bedae page
Thanks for your comment and corrections on the Paenitentiale Bedae page, De728631. In answer to your question, there are a number of important versions of this penitential for which there is no established English title; the standard titles ('Vorstufe'; 'Paenitentiale additivum'; etc.) remain in German and Latin principally because the subject has so far only received serious attention from German scholars, and only in articles and studies aimed at specialists (rather than a general, non-Latinate audience). But you are right: an English wiki page needs English titles. So I am going to take a stab at creating some, based on your preliminary suggestions. Thanks for getting me thinking about this! Eltheodigraeardgesece (talk) 15:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Image copyright
Hey - thanks for reviewing my tag of File:Govinda raj.jpg, which I tagged as having no source. I must have missed the bit sourcing the image to the book the photo resides in. However, I still believe the image is a copyright violation, and have listed it at WP:PUF at Misplaced Pages:Possibly_unfree_files/2014_May_30#File:Govinda_raj.jpg, if you wish to take a look. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 18:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
It's the most prominent noticeboard for urgent requests, and on this occasion the protection may be more harmful than the edits it is intended to prevent. Could you please remove the protection? Peter James (talk) 22:46, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
- The protection was set to expire automatically after four hours which it did today at 00:51 UTC. I wouldn't have protected the ANI board for any extended period anyway. As to the harmfulness, this seems to have been a recurring event and the board is frequently protected for various reasons, so short inconveniences for IP editors and newly registered accounts are actually nothing new – if undesirable nonetheless. De728631 (talk) 19:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Question
You closed a request I made at the AN board. The issue seemed to be the timing of the appeal. What is the appropriate time period to wait before raising such an appeal? Useitorloseit (talk) 21:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)