| Revision as of 19:21, 29 June 2006 editGTBacchus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Rollbackers60,420 edits →Civility warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:15, 30 June 2006 edit undoElliskev (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,499 edits archivingNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| ==Thank you== | |||
| For your support on the MetroStars vs RBNY issue. It's been a tough week for us Metro supporters, and many of us are having a difficult time with the transition, which for many will never occur. Every bit of support, for whatever reason, helps. ] <sub>(])</sub> 15:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Hey == | |||
| Thanks for welcoming me back. I hope to stay it's just that I have a lot of users following me about...any way how are you doing? And what are you currently working on? Anything I might be able to help with? :) ] 01:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == New ]! == | |||
| I just wanted to make you aware of the new ], and invite you to participate! --] 20:43, 31 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I thought I would inform you of this on the Club, as you had contributed to the article. ] 04:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{Catholic voter}} | |||
| == Home Brewing == | |||
| I didn't know that I deleted your comment regarding mead making. sorry. It must have been a problem with us both trying to post at the same time. - ] 11:59, 12 May 2009 (PDST) | |||
| == Reminder == | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="text-align: center" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |'''This is a reminder to ] by ] for the <br>'']'''''. <br /> Support or comment on the current nominations, or nominate an article for collaboration. | |||
| |} | |||
| == AGF == | == AGF == | ||
Revision as of 13:15, 30 June 2006
AGF
I politely suggest that you assume good faith before making accusations. My change to User:Chooserr's talk page was done in good faith and is absolutely not any form of vandalism. Thank your for understanding. Al 21:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Civil
 | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
Though there are certain exceptions, it is generally considered uncivil to delete messages on your talk page without response. Thank you for understanding. Al 21:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Your warning to Alienus
Ellis, I don't think Alienus would have had to research too hard to figure out where you're coming from on this. You can't scream to the world "I am X" and then act indignant when others repeat it back to you.
Anyhow, I've posted on Alienus' talk page regarding this dispute.Timothy Usher 02:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Elliskev
Thanks...I agree, but since my userpage has caused so much controversy I think I'll keep it deleted until I can make it more neutral - maybe not express so many beliefs. Chooserr 01:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Civility warning
It seems to me that you have acted in an uncivil manner on User_talk:Chooserr. It is important to keep a cool head, despite any comments against you. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and action can be taken against the other parties if necessary. Your involvement in attacking back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors, and lead to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! Al 02:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Eliskev, I noticed you replaced your message of encouragement to Chooserr. I appreciate your show of solidarity, and I too am happy to see Chooserr hang in there, but I don't think it's productive to call people "nothing but jackasses". Eventually, isn't the solution for us all to stop saying things like that? -GTBacchus 00:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it is. You're right. --Elliskev 12:36, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the return advice. You're right, of course. I'm more personally involved in Alienus' case than maybe I should be, and I don't consider him a troll, just an editor with some mistaken ideas about how to navigate disputes on a Wiki. It'll be interesting to see how he responds to this RfC they're putting together. Constructively, I hope. -GTBacchus 19:21, 29 June 2006 (UTC)