| Revision as of 14:12, 28 June 2014 editMilliongoldcoinpoint (talk | contribs)91 edits →Poor quality edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:14, 28 June 2014 edit undoMilliongoldcoinpoint (talk | contribs)91 edits →Replacing sourced text with original research: aware of the edit,not OR when you quote directly from the source.Next edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| In this edit you made the claim that a primary source was a systematic review . Please be more careful. ] (] · ] · ]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC) | In this edit you made the claim that a primary source was a systematic review . Please be more careful. ] (] · ] · ]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :Yes, yes I did. I think we can agree I've made plenty of great edits since starting on the page, but this was clearly not one of them. Thanks for pointing it out!] (]) 14:12, 28 June 2014 (UTC) | :Yes, yes I did. I think we can agree I've made plenty of great edits since starting on the page, but this was clearly not one of them. Thanks for pointing it out!] (]) 14:12, 28 June 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == Replacing sourced text with original research == | |||
| This edit you claim "rewording to better reflect on conclusions in citation" but you replaced sourced text with original research and thus . Please edit more carefully. ] (]) 11:16, 28 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:14, 28 June 2014
Poor quality edit
In this edit you made the claim that a primary source was a systematic review . Please be more careful. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, yes I did. I think we can agree I've made plenty of great edits since starting on the page, but this was clearly not one of them. Thanks for pointing it out!Milliongoldcoinpoint (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2014 (UTC)